Scholarpedia VS Reference.com

Compare Scholarpedia VS Reference.com and see what are their differences

Logseq

Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Scholarpedia

Scholarpedia is a wiki-based encyclopedia that features the English language articles and helpful materials only.

Reference.com

Reference.com is the #1 question answering service that delivers the best answers from the web and real people - all in one place.

Landing page //
2023-04-16

Landing page //
2023-09-27

Scholarpedia

Reference.com videos

No Reference.com videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Scholarpedia and Reference.com)

Reference.com

Content Collaboration

100 100%

Content Collaboration

0% 0

Languages

0 0%

Languages

100% 100

Wikis And Discussion Spaces

100 100%

Wikis And Discussion Spaces

0% 0

Translation Service

0 0%

Translation Service

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Scholarpedia and Reference.com. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Reference.com seems to be a lot more popular than Scholarpedia. While we know about 13 links to Reference.com, we've tracked only 1 mention of Scholarpedia. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Scholarpedia mentions (1)

The History of Microsoft Encarta
Scholarpedia[1] also exists, but is very sparse and mostly a specialist reference. [1] https://scholarpedia.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

Reference.com mentions (13)

Name a player who is a “legend” for your team, but was never that good
This wasn't for my team but, I was looking in this comment section for any mention of Billy Butler. Couldn't find any after maybe 2-3 minutes of looking. I remembered him being better than his stats on baseball-reference.com say he is. Maybe that was because I used to play a lot of MLB 2K11 when I was a younger. Source: over 1 year ago
[Newbie] Is my Powered USB Hub too close to my HF+ Discovery?
You can use WSJT-X,FLDigi,and other programs with the sdr software,but I'm no help there,as I use ham transcievers for digital. Look on radio https://reference.com for just about anything that you're interested in. It even has a state by state section.along with a database for cities and counties. You can spend a long time on that site,and learn a lot. Source: over 1 year ago
[US] This or That? - Which of these baby animals is known as a pup? [08-15-2022]
I think a lot of this depends on the site from where Microsoft culls their answers. For rat, the first that pops up when selecting it says a baby rat is a "kit," but if you search, it changes. Squeaks and nibbles says, "A baby rat is called a kitten or a pup," whereas reference.com says "a baby rat is called a pup.". Source: over 1 year ago
Michael Kay on the Rich Eisen Show: "The #Yankees will not overpay for Aaron Judge, Based on what I've been hearing around Aaron Judge wants to be the highest paid position player, and would want $36M+ a year"
Baseball reference.com shows him at 0 runs on defense, so perfectly average. NOt sure what you're looking at. I suppose statcast? I will have a look there. Source: almost 2 years ago
The conspiracy chart. Flat earth is exactly where I expected to find it.
The TOP response (reference.com) says 800f open air to 1500 ideal. Source: almost 2 years ago