Scalingo VS Jekyll

Scalingo Reviews

Jekyll Reviews

Scalingo mentions (11)

• Heroku alternatives

  You can try Scalingo, first PaaS to be certified ISO27001 and HDS 🙌. Source: over 1 year ago

• free-for.dev

  Scalingo.com — Primarily a PaaS but offers a 128MB to 192MB free tier of MySQL, PostgreSQL or MongoDB. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• How to deploy your Jekyll site on Scalingo

  Jekyll is a static site generator based on Ruby. Scalingo is a hosting provider (similar to Heroku, Platform-as-a-Service). One of the great things about Scalingo is that they are an European company with a data center in France. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Ask HN: So you moved off Heroku, where did you go?

  Throwing Scalingo [1] in here because I feel they get way less exposure than they deserve. We [2] offer a SaaS for medical device companies. GDPR compliance made us look for a EU-based company, and the recent Heroku situations (disappearing free tier and GitHub OAuth fiasco) made us switch to Scalingo. Scalingo is based in France. Their PaaS is rock-solid. The UI sometimes looks less polished but that shouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• Why we’ve decided to decommission Gov.uk PaaS

  Scalingo https://scalingo.com is basically a french Heroku-compatible PaaS based on a reliable french IaaS (Outscale, cloud subsidiary of Dassault Systemes, the famous maker of Catia, Solidworkds, etc). - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

Jekyll mentions (180)

• Creating excerpts in Astro

  This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview

  We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation

  In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform

  In future, if you want to move from Jekyll to something else, you just have to worry about that `_posts` and `_assets` folder. They may have different naming convention but you can just config-managed it or change it to your choice. This is why I suggested owning that two yourself. You also may not worry about FrontMatter[3] (meta in the header) and its accompanying jazz by asking Jekyll to use the plugins... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform

  As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago