Satis VS Vcpkg
Compare Satis VS Vcpkg and see what are their differences
Auto arrange all your app windows, whether on one screen or many with a single click!
featured
Satis
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Private Packagist
Artifactory
Toran Proxy
ProGet
Packeton
Cloudsmith
Vcpkg
Conan
Conda
Chocolatey
pacman (package manager)
Hunter package manager
CPM
pip
Satis VcpkgNo Vcpkg videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Vcpkg should be more popular than Satis. It has been mentiond 24 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Note: Satis is a local repo repository — the pro code is likely not on github. They set up their own system to handle these repositories outside of github/packagist. Source: over 1 year ago
If you want/need to self-host this internally, you can look at satis to create and self-host a repository. Since you need to add the packages manually, your security team can vet the code before adding it. There is a post on gitconnected on how to set this up: https://levelup.gitconnected.com/how-to-host-your-own-private-packagist-for-free-or-extremely-cheap-faf44eca3647. Source: almost 2 years ago
We have a private Satis instance. Our ITSec team reviews all packages before we add them to Satis. Packagist.com is available for us but the CI-CD servers can reach only the private Satis. Source: almost 2 years ago
My team and I use Satis to accomplish that. It's hosted on our servers and we can easily release new versions. Dependabot can even upgrade the dependencies if new ones are detected. Source: almost 2 years ago
Composer supports multiple types of custom respositories, so you can host your own repository (with something like Satis), pay for a packagist.com private repository or even use a VCS repository to fetch packages directly from your private GIT repos. Source: over 2 years ago
Re: C/C++ development: anybody using conda/pixi for dependency management? Here's an example of compiling a C++ SDL program using pixi and the SDL dependency from conda-forge [1]. Seems viable as a replacement for things like vckpg [2] which only builds from source. I'm still researching this but it seems like rattler [3] is the tool to use to build/publish packages. The supported repos are: prefix.dev's own... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Plenty of raw information should be available here, the actual vcpkg repo: https://github.com/microsoft/vcpkg. Source: over 1 year ago
Actually, there is: C++ Library Manager for Windows, Linux, and MacOS. Source: over 1 year ago
The installation is described in the readme of vcpkg on github and is straightforward: clone the project, execute the installation script and you are ready to go! - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
You didn't ask about this, but I think its worth mentioning Conan and vcpkg. Of the two I have found vcpkg easier to work with, but both can be good solutions. Combining one of these package managers with CMake presets can make getting a project setup on a new machine almost trivial (great for CI or onboarding new devs). Source: over 1 year ago
Sonatype Nexus Repository - The world's only repository manager with FREE support for popular formats.
Conan - Conan is an Action-Adventure, Hack and Slash and Single-player video game developed by Nihilistic Software and published by THQ.
Private Packagist - Composer package archive as a service for PHP
Conda - Binary package manager with support for environments.
Artifactory - The world’s most advanced repository manager.
Chocolatey - The sane way to manage software on Windows.