Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Sass VS EJS

Compare Sass VS EJS and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Sass logo Sass

Syntatically Awesome Style Sheets

EJS logo EJS

An open source JavaScript Template library.
  • Sass Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-19
  • EJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-11

Sass features and specs

  • Nesting
    Sass allows for nested syntax, making it easier to target specific elements and providing a clear, hierarchical structure to CSS code.
  • Variables
    Sass supports variables that can store values such as colors, fonts, or any CSS value, making it simple to maintain and update styles.
  • Mixins
    Mixins in Sass enable reusable chunks of code, which can dramatically reduce redundancy and simplify complex CSS.
  • Partials and Import
    With Sass, CSS can be split into smaller, more manageable partial files which are then imported into a central stylesheet, enhancing modularity and organization.
  • Control Directives
    Sass includes control directives (such as @if, @for, @each) that allow for conditional logic and loops, providing more dynamic CSS generation.
  • Built-in Functions
    Sass offers a variety of built-in functions for manipulating colors, strings, and other values, empowering developers to create more sophisticated styles.
  • Compass and Other Frameworks
    Sass can be extended with frameworks such as Compass, which provides additional mixins and functionality, speeding up development.
  • Community and Documentation
    Sass has a strong community and comprehensive documentation, which makes it easier to find solutions to problems and learn best practices.

Possible disadvantages of Sass

  • Learning Curve
    Sass introduces various features and syntax that may require additional time and resources to learn and adopt, especially for developers new to pre-processors.
  • Dependency on Compilation
    Sass needs to be compiled into standard CSS, which requires build tools and adds an extra step in the development workflow.
  • Tooling Requirements
    Using Sass effectively often involves additional tools like Node.js, npm, and task runners (e.g., Gulp, Grunt), which can complicate setup and maintenance.
  • Performance
    In large projects, the compilation time for Sass can become noticeable, potentially slowing down the development process, especially when dealing with extensive stylesheets.
  • Compatibility
    Older projects or those not built with modern development tools might face compatibility issues when integrating Sass, requiring significant refactoring.
  • Overhead
    For smaller projects, the overhead of setting up and maintaining Sass and its related tools may not be justified compared to the benefits gained.

EJS features and specs

  • Simplicity
    EJS is easy to learn and use, especially for developers who are already familiar with JavaScript. The syntax is straightforward, making it a good choice for quick application development.
  • JavaScript Integration
    Since EJS templates are JavaScript files, you can seamlessly integrate JavaScript code, making it easy to manipulate data and use familiar JavaScript functions.
  • Lightweight
    EJS is a lightweight template engine, which makes it an optimal choice for applications where performance and simplicity are critical.
  • Flexibility
    Allows for the embedding of plain JavaScript within the templates, giving developers the flexibility to add logic directly in their HTML.
  • Partial Templates
    Supports partials, which help to reuse code snippets across different views, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    Supports server-side rendering, which can improve performance by reducing the amount of client-side processing needed.

Possible disadvantages of EJS

  • Limited Functionality
    Compared to more feature-rich template engines like Handlebars or Pug, EJS offers limited functionalities which might be a drawback for large, complex projects.
  • Debugging
    Debugging EJS templates can sometimes be challenging. Errors within templates can often be vague, making it difficult to trace the root cause.
  • Maintenance
    Embedding a lot of JavaScript within templates can make the code harder to read and maintain, especially as the complexity of the application grows.
  • Performance Overhead
    For very large and complex templates, EJS can introduce a performance overhead compared to more optimized template engines designed for high performance.
  • Community and Support
    While EJS has a reasonable user base, the community and support may not be as extensive as more popular alternatives like React or Vue.js.

Analysis of Sass

Overall verdict

  • Sass is considered a valuable tool for web developers looking to streamline their CSS writing process, maintain scalability, and enhance productivity.

Why this product is good

  • Sass is a powerful CSS preprocessor that extends CSS with features like variables, nested rules, mixins, and functions. It helps maintain large stylesheets by providing more dynamic and reusable code structures compared to plain CSS.

Recommended for

  • Front-end developers aiming to improve code maintainability.
  • Projects with large, complex stylesheets.
  • Teams that work collaboratively on front-end projects.
  • Developers transitioning from design to development who require easier CSS management.

Analysis of EJS

Overall verdict

  • Yes, EJS is considered good, particularly for projects where developers want ease of use and flexibility with JavaScript templating. It is lightweight, easy to learn, and integrates well with Express, a popular Node.js web application framework.

Why this product is good

  • EJS (Embedded JavaScript Templating) is popular because it provides a simple way to generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. It allows for the embedding of JavaScript logic within your HTML templates, making it straightforward to use for those familiar with JavaScript. It's known for its efficiency in rendering templates and ease of integration with Node.js applications.

Recommended for

    EJS is recommended for developers building server-side web applications using Node.js and those looking for a simple, yet effective, templating solution. It is particularly suitable for small to medium-sized projects where dynamic content generation is needed and for teams that prioritize simplicity and performance.

Sass videos

The Armalite AR10 Super SASS

More videos:

  • Review - Armalite Super SASS
  • Review - M110 SASS to 800yds: Practical Accuracy (Leupold Mk4, US Sniper Rifle)
  • Review - Anatomy of the Semi Automatic Sniper System (SASS): Featuring the Lone Star Armory TX10 DM Heavy
  • Review - ArmaLite XM110 Rifle to AR10 Super SASS

EJS videos

Kane Creek - Bestop Trail Review at EJS 2019

More videos:

  • Tutorial - JavaScript Templating Tutorial | Introduction To EJS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Sass and EJS)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
39 39%
61% 61
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Sass and EJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sass should be more popular than EJS. It has been mentiond 145 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Sass mentions (145)

  • Sass-lang dev embeds "Free Palestine" site alert
    Top of https://sass-lang.com/ says "free palestine" since March 2024 and previously it said "black lives matter" since at least 2023. Plenty of websites had or have Ukrainian flags showing support. The web isn't apolitical. I don't see how the website affects the (installable, open source) software. - Source: Hacker News / 10 days ago
  • Storybook Starter Guide: Learn Design System Principles
    For example, at CKEditor, we use a hybrid approach — Syntactically Awesome Style Sheets (Sass) preprocessor and CSS variables:. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Build Content Management System with React and Node: Beginning Project Setup
    SASS - Sass, or Syntactically Awesome Stylesheets, is a CSS preprocessor that extends the functionality of CSS with features like variables, nesting, and mixins. Integrating Sass with React allows for more maintainable and modular styling by enabling the use of these advanced CSS features within React components. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Chapter 1: setup, CSS, version control and SASS
    In addition to this, we might want to use some of the power of SASS on our site. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Minimalist blog with Zola, AWS CDK, and Tailwind CSS - Part 1
    This command will prompt a few questions, among them if you want to use SaSS compilation and if you would like to have a search enabled. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

EJS mentions (26)

  • Next.js vs Express: What to Choose in 2025?
    Express does not provide SEO benefits by default and would require additional configuration with tools like EJS (Embedded JavaScript) or Handlebars for server-side rendering. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Chapter 7: HTML part two
    For a more robust approach, we'd probably need to install a templating language of some kind, such as Twig, EJS, Handlebars, Pug or Mustache (this is not a complete list!). Reading the documentation for posthtml-modules, you'll notice it doesn't mention package.json or any of the approaches we've used in this guide. Instead, the examples are in JavaScript and we've advised to add this to our Node application. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Web Components and SSR - 2024 Edition
    Server-side Framework SSR is when you use a framework that runs the HTML templating logic entirely on the server to compose the HTML that will be rendered in the browser. These are frameworks like Ruby on Rails, ASP.Net, PHP, or even Node.js frameworks that use templating languages like Pug or EJS. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • How to Build an Application With Node.js
    We need a templating engine to render HTML code in the browser using Node.js. We'll use ejs (Embedded JavaScript) for this tutorial but there are others such as Pug (formerly known as Jade) and Express Handlebar, which also render HTML on the server. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Getting to the meat and potatoes of serverless recipe parsing with Amazon Bedrock
    The tags is where you put the HTML you want Claude to read. The <%- document %> contained within is an ejs placeholder. More on this shortly. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Sass and EJS, you can also consider the following products

PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.

Mustache.js - Minimal templating with {{mustaches}} in JavaScript - janl/mustache.js

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Handlebars - Handlebars is a JavaScript template library that is, more or less, based on ...

Stylus - EXPRESSIVE, DYNAMIC, ROBUST CSS

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces