Based on our record, Sass seems to be a lot more popular than CSS Scan. While we know about 133 links to Sass, we've tracked only 12 mentions of CSS Scan. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Attractions is a UI kit for Svelte that includes 49 components and a collection of helper functions. It uses Sass for styling. Although the Attractions kit seems promising and the components look really nice, it's not very actively supported right now and its future is uncertain. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
We took our time evaluating different options and ultimately landed on a focused set of technologies: Next.js, TypeScript, Redux Toolkit, SASS, and Axios. This combination offers a powerful and manageable foundation for our project, avoiding the pitfalls of an overly complex tech stack. - Source: dev.to / 27 days ago
Traditionally CSS lacked features such as variables, nesting, mixins, and functions. This was frustrating for Developers as it often led to CSS quickly becoming complex and cumbersome. In an attempt to make code easier and less repetitive CSS pre-processors were born. You would write CSS in the format the pre-processor understood and, at build time, you'd have some nice CSS. The most common pre-processors these... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
CSS stands for Cascading Style Sheets, and is a scripting language used to style web pages. SCSS stands for Syntactically Awesome Style Sheet, and is a superset of CSS. You can think of SCSS as the more advanced version of CSS, which comes with several features that CSS does not support, such as the SCSS nested syntax, as shown below. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
In the past, you’d need to rely on pre-processors such as SaSS or Less, but not anymore… Native CSS nesting has landed on all major modern browsers. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Bit confused, are you not also the developer of CSS Scan? What is the difference between these, and why is the price so much higher on CSS Pro? CSS Scan doesn't even have a subscription, and the lifetime license is only $3 more than the monthly subscription on CSS Pro. Source: almost 1 year ago
> Does anyone know a good extension that just does the hover / inspect element for the CSS styles in a nice way like this app? I think the same person makes CSS Scan ($95 lifetime): https://getcssscan.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
A few months ago I saw: https://getcssscan.com/ which cost US 69.99. Source: over 1 year ago
I came across css scan and it looked really nice, but then I came across css scan pro which is extremely similar to it, except for having a monthly payment instead of a one-time. Has anyone ever used these tools before, can tell me which one is better? Source: over 1 year ago
🔺 A curated collection of 57 free shapes examples made with pure CSS: 👉 https://getcssscan.com/css-shapes. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.
CSS Scan Pro - The easiest way to get and edit the CSS of any website, live
Stylus - EXPRESSIVE, DYNAMIC, ROBUST CSS
Hoverify - All-in-one browser extension to improve your web dev experience.
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.