Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

RxJS VS V (programming language)

Compare RxJS VS V (programming language) and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

RxJS logo RxJS

Reactive Extensions for Javascript

V (programming language) logo V (programming language)

Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software.
  • RxJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-29
  • V (programming language) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-25

RxJS features and specs

  • Asynchronous Programming Model
    RxJS allows you to work with asynchronous data streams with ease, enabling you to handle events, Ajax requests, and other asynchronous operations more effectively.
  • Composability
    RxJS operators enable developers to compose complex asynchronous operations concisely. This provides greater flexibility and power over handling streams of data.
  • Functional Programming Paradigm
    By using a functional programming approach, RxJS promotes cleaner and more predictable code. It encourages immutability and side-effect-free functions, enhancing code maintainability.
  • Rich Operator Set
    RxJS has a comprehensive set of operators, which allows developers to transform, combine, and filter data streams in various ways without needing to write a lot of boilerplate code.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    With its active community and extensive ecosystem, RxJS provides robust support, an abundance of learning resources, and numerous integrations with other libraries and frameworks.

Possible disadvantages of RxJS

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For developers unfamiliar with reactive programming concepts or functional programming, understanding RxJS can be challenging, potentially leading to difficulty in adopting it.
  • Overhead for Simple Tasks
    Using RxJS for simple asynchronous tasks might add unnecessary complexity compared to native JavaScript promises or async/await due to its powerful abstractions.
  • Bundle Size
    In certain circumstances, incorporating RxJS might lead to increased bundle sizes, which can be a concern for web performance if not managed properly.
  • Complex Debugging
    RxJS introduces a level of abstraction that can make debugging more complex, especially when dealing with multiple combined and transformed data streams.
  • Performance Overhead
    While RxJS is powerful, its generalized approach to handling asynchronous stream processing can introduce performance overhead if not used judiciously.

V (programming language) features and specs

  • Fast Compilation
    V is designed to compile extremely fast, typically within less than a second, regardless of the size of the codebase.
  • Simplicity
    The syntax is simple and easy to learn, drawing inspiration from languages like Go and Python which reduces the learning curve for new developers.
  • Performance
    V aims to offer high performance akin to C, enabling developers to write highly efficient programs.
  • Safe Programming
    It includes built-in mechanisms to avoid common bugs and aims to provide safety features like immutable data structures and option types.
  • Single Binary
    V produces a single small binary without external dependencies, making distribution straightforward and more secure.
  • Cross-Platform
    V supports cross-compilation out of the box, allowing developers to build applications for multiple operating systems from a single codebase.

Possible disadvantages of V (programming language)

  • Maturing Ecosystem
    As a relatively new language, V's ecosystem, including libraries, frameworks, and community support, is still growing and may not be as mature as more established languages.
  • Limited Tooling
    Compared to more established languages, tools like IDE support, debuggers, and other development utilities are still limited or in early stages.
  • Smaller Community
    The community around V is smaller, which can result in fewer resources, tutorials, and third-party libraries being available.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the syntax is simple, mastering some of V's advanced features and paradigms may pose a learning curve to developers coming from more mainstream languages.
  • Rapid Changes
    As the language is still evolving, there can be rapid changes and updates which may introduce breaking changes or require frequent revisions of codebases.

RxJS videos

RxJS is My Favorite Library

More videos:

  • Review - Reactive Programming with RxJS - James Churchill
  • Review - Tero Parviainen "Reactive Music Apps in Angular and RxJS"

V (programming language) videos

V Programming Language (Vlang): First Impression - Mike Shah

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to V and its features (Sydney Computing Society)
  • Review - Testing the NEW "V" programming language!
  • Demo - Presentation of Vlang at IBM
  • Review - An introduction to V (Vlang)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RxJS and V (programming language))
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
Programming Language
0 0%
100% 100
Front-End Frameworks
100 100%
0% 0
OOP
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using RxJS and V (programming language). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, V (programming language) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 74 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RxJS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RxJS yet. Tracking of RxJS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

V (programming language) mentions (74)

  • Koto Programming Language
    > For me the biggest gap in programming languages is a rust like language with a garbage collector, instead of a borrow checker. https://vlang.io. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Go Is a Well-Designed Language
    I think V [1] is what Go should’ve been. Simple, compiles fast, integrated language tooling, in fact quite similar to Go, but without all the dumb design decisions. Unlike Go, it has sum types, enums, immutable-by-default variables, option/result types, various other goodies and the syntax for for loops actually makes sense. It’s a shame that the compiler is quite buggy, but hopefully that’s going to improve. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Mantis - new file log driver
    Mantis is a type-safe web framework written in V that emphasizes explicit, magic-free code. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Mantis, a web framework written in V
    For development, V offers both an interpreter and watch mode, combining the convenience of scripting languages with the type safety and performance of compiled languages. It even includes built-in channel-compatible concurrency - truly the best of both worlds. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Lies we tell ourselves to keep using Golang
    What is quite interesting (after looking at their documentation), is that V lang[1] has all that is mentioned: `?`[2], `or`[2], sum types[4], and can return multiple values[5]. [1]: https://vlang.io/ [2]: https://github.com/vlang/v/blob/master/doc/docs.md#optionresult-types-and-error-handling [4]: - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RxJS and V (programming language), you can also consider the following products

Zustand - Bear necessities for state management in React

Nim (programming language) - The Nim programming language is a concise, fast programming language that compiles to C, C++ and JavaScript.

MobX - Simple, scalable state management

D (Programming Language) - D is a language with C-like syntax and static typing.

Redux.js - Predictable state container for JavaScript apps

Go Programming Language - Go, also called golang, is a programming language initially developed at Google in 2007 by Robert...