Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

RxJS VS React.run

Compare RxJS VS React.run and see what are their differences

RxJS logo RxJS

Reactive Extensions for Javascript

React.run logo React.run

Quick in-browser prototyping for React Components!
  • RxJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-29
  • React.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-11

RxJS features and specs

  • Asynchronous Programming Model
    RxJS allows you to work with asynchronous data streams with ease, enabling you to handle events, Ajax requests, and other asynchronous operations more effectively.
  • Composability
    RxJS operators enable developers to compose complex asynchronous operations concisely. This provides greater flexibility and power over handling streams of data.
  • Functional Programming Paradigm
    By using a functional programming approach, RxJS promotes cleaner and more predictable code. It encourages immutability and side-effect-free functions, enhancing code maintainability.
  • Rich Operator Set
    RxJS has a comprehensive set of operators, which allows developers to transform, combine, and filter data streams in various ways without needing to write a lot of boilerplate code.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    With its active community and extensive ecosystem, RxJS provides robust support, an abundance of learning resources, and numerous integrations with other libraries and frameworks.

Possible disadvantages of RxJS

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For developers unfamiliar with reactive programming concepts or functional programming, understanding RxJS can be challenging, potentially leading to difficulty in adopting it.
  • Overhead for Simple Tasks
    Using RxJS for simple asynchronous tasks might add unnecessary complexity compared to native JavaScript promises or async/await due to its powerful abstractions.
  • Bundle Size
    In certain circumstances, incorporating RxJS might lead to increased bundle sizes, which can be a concern for web performance if not managed properly.
  • Complex Debugging
    RxJS introduces a level of abstraction that can make debugging more complex, especially when dealing with multiple combined and transformed data streams.
  • Performance Overhead
    While RxJS is powerful, its generalized approach to handling asynchronous stream processing can introduce performance overhead if not used judiciously.

React.run features and specs

  • Simplified Setup
    React.run provides a streamlined and efficient setup for starting new React projects, minimizing the initial configuration time.
  • Pre-configured Environment
    It comes with a pre-configured environment that includes essential tools and libraries, reducing the need for additional setup and compatibility checks.
  • Boost developer productivity
    By automating much of the setup process, React.run allows developers to focus more on coding and less on configuring their development environment.
  • Consistency
    Ensures a standardized environment across different projects, which can be particularly beneficial for teams and large-scale applications.
  • Community Support
    Being an officially supported tool, it benefits from strong community support and timely updates from the React team.

Possible disadvantages of React.run

  • Limited Flexibility
    The pre-configured setup may not suit all project requirements, and making customizations can sometimes be challenging or require additional steps.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers new to React.run might face a learning curve as they adapt to the specific configurations and conventions used by the tool.
  • Dependency on Tool
    Relying heavily on React.run can create dependency, making it harder to switch to different tools or configurations if needed in the future.
  • Updates and Compatibility
    Although it receives updates, there's always a risk that a new version might introduce breaking changes or compatibility issues with existing projects.
  • Potential Overhead
    The inclusion of tools and libraries that may not be necessary for all projects can potentially add overhead and bloat to the development environment.

RxJS videos

RxJS is My Favorite Library

More videos:

  • Review - Reactive Programming with RxJS - James Churchill
  • Review - Tero Parviainen "Reactive Music Apps in Angular and RxJS"

React.run videos

No React.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RxJS and React.run)
Javascript UI Libraries
16 16%
84% 84
Front-End Frameworks
29 29%
71% 71
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
JS Library
35 35%
65% 65

User comments

Share your experience with using RxJS and React.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, React.run seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 187 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RxJS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RxJS yet. Tracking of RxJS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

React.run mentions (187)

  • You should know this before choosing Next.js
    [2] https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • CVE-2025-29927 – Next.js
    > What do you get out of Next.js over vanilla React? The biggest problem is that React itself recommends against using Vanilla React. https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app > If you want to build a new app or website with React, we recommend starting with a framework. This, frankly, is insane. The whole point of React was that it was this relatively lightweight UI library you could drop into pretty much any... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • How much traffic can a pre-rendered Next.js site handle?
    I think people reasonably expect, say, an aws lambda to be aws specific. That's a very different story to React, which is supposed to be a library for general application ui development, and the official react documentation recommending Next as the way to use it. https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Sunsetting Create React App
    Interestingly, the Creating a React App page (https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app) does not mention Remix. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • React v19 has been released
    The Getting Started docs recommend against using vanilla React and nudge you towards NextJS and similar frameworks because you're gonna end up needing that stuff eventually https://react.dev/learn/start-a-new-react-project So new projects have to actively not follow the recommended approach in the docs if they want to use vanilla React. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RxJS and React.run, you can also consider the following products

Zustand - Bear necessities for state management in React

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

MobX - Simple, scalable state management

Vite - Next Generation Frontend Tooling

Redux.js - Predictable state container for JavaScript apps

Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps