RunsOn
BuildJet for GitHub Actions
Cirun.io
GitHub Actions
Visual Studio Code
Typora
Experiences by Proof
HelpSpace
Commit Together by Github
CommitTasks
Refined GitHub
Commit Print
gitbird
Datree.io
GitHub for Atom
GitHub for Mobile
Cheap runners are just one part of the equation: nobody likes slow runs, even if it's cheap.
RunsOn gives you access to some of the fastest machines on the market, thanks to AWS extensive hardware selection.
Which makes RunsOn the fastest provider of self-hosted, fully ephemeral runners on the market.
We automatically build and publish copies of the official runner images at most 24h after their official release, so that you can be certain that your workflows will always work on either GitHub runners, or your own RunsOn runners.
RunsOn Commit Together by GithubNo features have been listed yet.
RunsOn's answer
10x cheaper than GitHub official runners. Runs in your own AWS account. More secure than sharing your secrets with other third-party tools like BuildJet or Warpbuild.
RunsOn's answer
Cheap, fast, on-premise alternative to maintaining self-hosted runners.
RunsOn's answer
CTO / Senior developers
RunsOn's answer
Built a similar product for one of my clients, reduced CI build cost by 10 times, and improve build speed from 1h to 20min.
Based on our record, RunsOn should be more popular than Commit Together by Github. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
> We were using self-hosted runners which were not as efficient as we thought so we spawned EC2 instances and connected them to the github network to be runners, but we had such an amount of issues that we wanted to go back to non-self hosted For those hitting that same kind of issue (and you are many), you should check out my product https://runs-on.com. 1-click install, 1-click upgrades, and from 7x to 16x... - Source: Hacker News / 14 days ago
> while we can boot the Actions runner within 5 seconds of a job starting, it can take GitHub 10+ seconds to actually deliver that job to the runner This. I went the same route with regards to boot time optimisations for [1] (cleaning up the AMI, cloud-init, etc.), and can boot a VM from cold in 15s (I can't rely on prewarming pools of machines -- even stopped -- since RunsOn doesn't share machines with multiple... - Source: Hacker News / 27 days ago
Yes, I wonder when/if GitHub decides to drop prices at some point. But in the meantime I’ve recently released RunsOn [1] with the same promise (10x cheaper, faster) but the whole thing runs in your AWS account. [1] https://runs-on.com. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
BuildJet for GitHub Actions - We provide users with managed high-performance runners for Github Actions.
CommitTasks - A small CLI tool that combines git commit and todo list 🛠📝
Cirun.io - GitHub Actions on your Cloud!
Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful
GitHub Actions - Automate your workflow from idea to production
Commit Print - Posters of your git history