Software Alternatives & Reviews

RuboCop VS Standard JS

Compare RuboCop VS Standard JS and see what are their differences

RuboCop logo RuboCop

A Ruby static code analyzer, based on the community Ruby style guide.

Standard JS logo Standard JS

DevOps, Build, Test, Deploy, and Code Review
  • RuboCop Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30
  • Standard JS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29

RuboCop videos

RubyConfBY 2018: Bozhidar Batsov "All about RuboCop"

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to setup Rubocop and best practices of its usage | Lifehacks on Ruby
  • Review - [EN] All About RuboCop / Bozhidar Batsov @bbatsov

Standard JS videos

No Standard JS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RuboCop and Standard JS)
Code Coverage
33 33%
67% 67
Code Analysis
38 38%
62% 62
Code Review
100 100%
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using RuboCop and Standard JS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Standard JS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 27 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RuboCop mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RuboCop yet. Tracking of RuboCop recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Standard JS mentions (27)

  • Mastering Code Quality: Setting Up ESLint with Standard JS in TypeScript Projects
    Sorry, I've gone too far. I'm not here to persuade you to use Standard JS. My intention is to provide information and guidance on configuring JavaScript Standard Style for your team, should you agree with me or have other reasons to choose it. - Source: dev.to / about 3 hours ago
  • Why is Prettier rock solid?
    I picked up standard[1] a while back for this reason, I don't want to have to think about it. It works fine, I have no complaints (took me a while to get used to not using semi-colons but now I prefer it) Same reason I use `cargo fmt` as well. [1] https://standardjs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • My prepared repositories for hacktoberfest 23 - any contributions are welcomed 🚀
    A Thin JavaScript Document Storage with Middleware Stack. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Dumb question
    For example, if you use https://standardjs.com/ - it will error on your second code snippet and if you ask it for an autofix - it will transfer the minus sign to the first line. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Unleash the Power of Java: A JavaScript Developer's Guide to Best Practices in Java Development
    In comparison, JavaScript doesn't have a strict coding standard, although it does have widely accepted code style guides like the Airbnb JavaScript Style Guide and the JavaScript Standard Style. These guides provide recommendations for code formatting and naming conventions, but they are not as strictly enforced as the Java coding standard. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RuboCop and Standard JS, you can also consider the following products

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Prettier - An opinionated code formatter

ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool

EditorConfig - EditorConfig is a file format and collection of text editor plugins for maintaining consistent coding styles between different editors and IDEs.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

CryptoHack - A fun platform for learning cryptography