rkt VS Zero Install

Compare rkt VS Zero Install and see what are their differences

Bunny.net

BunnyCDN is a simple and powerful CDN, offering lightning fast performance for a fraction of the cost with free SSL, Brotli, HTTP/2 and 100% Pay As You Go pricing. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Zero Install

Zero Install is a decentralised cross-distribution software installation system.

Landing page //
2023-05-08

Landing page //
2021-07-26

RKT IPO Review | Is Rocket a Buy for 2020? | Matt Mulvihill

Zero Install videos

+ Add

Zero Installation Purifier Reverse Osmosis Unboxing - Demo - Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to rkt and Zero Install)

Zero Install

Cloud Computing

100 100%

Cloud Computing

0% 0

Software Marketplace

0 0%

Software Marketplace

100% 100

Cloud Storage

100 100%

Cloud Storage

0% 0

OS & Utilities

0 0%

OS & Utilities

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using rkt and Zero Install. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare rkt and Zero Install

In 2018, 12 percent of production containers were rkt (pronounced “Rocket”). Rkt supports two types of images: Docker and appc. A selling point of rkt is its pod-based process that works out of the box with Kubernetes (also referred to as “rktnetes”). In Kubernetes, an rkt container runtime can easily be specified:

Source: containerjournal.com

Zero Install Reviews

We have no reviews of Zero Install yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Zero Install seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

rkt mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of rkt yet. Tracking of rkt recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Zero Install mentions (4)

Using jlink to cross-compile minimal JREs
Sounds like https://0install.net which has been around for a while. Personally I prefer to avoid 'installing' anything: if something's written in Java, its launcher should reference some specific java binary; if something's written in Python, it should reference some specific python3 binary; etc. For example, my job is mostly writing Scala and building it with Maven; yet I have neither installed system-wide.... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Go binding for upx utility
It seems more like a package manager. https://0install.net/. Source: over 1 year ago
Ubuntu's Snap performs application updates without user consent
The article mentions Snap, AppImage and FlatPak, but there is also a much older system called 0install (zero install) that was started in 2003 or so [1]. I wonder why that never took off. [1] https://zero-install.sourceforge.net/roadmap.html (note this is the old website; the new website is https://0install.net - looks like it's still getting releases in October this year). - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Flaptak (and Snap) is not the future
That's true, future app distributions should utilize web 3.0, e.g. decentralization. There is 0install ( https://0install.net/ ), for example, it is better. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago