Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Zero Install VS containerd

Compare Zero Install VS containerd and see what are their differences

Zero Install logo Zero Install

Zero Install is a decentralised cross-distribution software installation system.

containerd logo containerd

An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability
  • Zero Install Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-26
  • containerd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-15

Zero Install videos

Zero Installation Purifier Reverse Osmosis Unboxing - Demo - Review

containerd videos

Deep Dive: containerd - Derek McGowan, Docker & Phil Estes, IBM Cloud

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Zero Install and containerd)
Software Marketplace
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
OS & Utilities
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Zero Install and containerd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Zero Install and containerd

Zero Install Reviews

We have no reviews of Zero Install yet.
Be the first one to post

containerd Reviews

5 Container Alternatives to Docker
containerd is described as “an industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability.” An incubating project of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation, containerd is available as a daemon for Linux or Windows.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, containerd seems to be a lot more popular than Zero Install. While we know about 45 links to containerd, we've tracked only 4 mentions of Zero Install. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Zero Install mentions (4)

  • Using jlink to cross-compile minimal JREs
    Sounds like https://0install.net which has been around for a while. Personally I prefer to avoid 'installing' anything: if something's written in Java, its launcher should reference some specific java binary; if something's written in Python, it should reference some specific python3 binary; etc. For example, my job is mostly writing Scala and building it with Maven; yet I have neither installed system-wide.... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Go binding for upx utility
    It seems more like a package manager. https://0install.net/. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Ubuntu's Snap performs application updates without user consent
    The article mentions Snap, AppImage and FlatPak, but there is also a much older system called 0install (zero install) that was started in 2003 or so [1]. I wonder why that never took off. [1] https://zero-install.sourceforge.net/roadmap.html (note this is the old website; the new website is https://0install.net - looks like it's still getting releases in October this year). - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Flaptak (and Snap) is not the future
    That's true, future app distributions should utilize web 3.0, e.g. decentralization. There is 0install ( https://0install.net/ ), for example, it is better. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

containerd mentions (45)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Zero Install and containerd, you can also consider the following products

IObit Software Updater - IObit is an application that updates the software of your PC to keep all the software properly working.

rkt - App Container runtime

Patch My PC - Patch My PC Updater is a free, easy-to-use program that keeps over 300 apps up-to-date on your computer.

CRI-O - Lightweight Container Runtime for Kubernetes

Ninite - Ninite is the easiest way to install software.

Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images