Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

rkt VS SolidCP

Compare rkt VS SolidCP and see what are their differences

PulpMiner
Converts Any Webpage Into Realtime JSON API 🟢 featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

rkt logo rkt

App Container runtime

SolidCP logo SolidCP

SolidCP is a free and open source multiple server enterprise control panel for the Windows operating systems.
  • rkt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-08
  • SolidCP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-27

rkt features and specs

  • Compatibility
    rkt supports the App Container (appc) spec and can also run Docker container images, providing flexibility and compatibility with various container formats.
  • Security
    rkt is designed with security in mind, offering features like process isolation through Linux namespaces, user namespaces, and SELinux/AppArmor integration.
  • Isolation
    rkt runs applications in their own stage1 environments, ensuring strong isolation between containers and better resource management.
  • Modularity
    rkt is built with a modular architecture, allowing users to swap out the stage1 implementation to better fit their needs.
  • Lightweight
    rkt avoids running a central daemon, thus using fewer system resources and simplifying debugging and monitoring.

Possible disadvantages of rkt

  • Maturity
    rkt is not as mature as Docker, meaning it may lack some features and integrations that have been developed for Docker.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    rkt has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Docker, which may limit the availability of third-party tools and support.
  • Adoption
    rkt has lower adoption rates, leading to fewer tutorials, guides, and community-driven content, which can make the learning curve steeper.
  • Development Activity
    rkt's development and maintenance activity is not as high as Docker's, which could impact long-term viability and feature development.
  • Enterprise Support
    Enterprise-grade support and services for rkt may not be as widely available or comprehensive as those for Docker.

SolidCP features and specs

  • Open Source
    SolidCP is open-source software, meaning it is free to use and modify. This provides flexibility and lowers costs for users.
  • Windows Server Support
    SolidCP is tailored for Windows servers, supporting a wide range of Windows services, including IIS, MSSQL, and Exchange.
  • Multi-Tenant Environment
    It supports multi-tenancy, which allows hosting providers to manage multiple clients on a single server efficiently.
  • Extensive Feature Set
    SolidCP offers numerous features such as web hosting, email management, database management, and file management in a single platform.
  • Flexible Configuration
    The platform allows administrators to configure and customize many aspects of the hosting environment, enabling tailored solutions.

Possible disadvantages of SolidCP

  • Limited Linux Support
    SolidCP primarily focuses on Windows environments, which may limit its compatibility with Linux servers and applications.
  • Community-Driven Support
    As open-source software, support primarily comes from community forums, which might be slower or less comprehensive compared to commercial support options.
  • Complex Setup
    The installation and configuration process can be complex, requiring technical expertise, especially for less experienced users.
  • User Interface
    Some users find the interface to be less modern or intuitive compared to other control panels, potentially affecting usability.
  • Resource Intensive
    SolidCP may require significant server resources, which can affect performance if not properly managed or on lower-end hardware.

Analysis of rkt

Overall verdict

  • Overall, RKT is a strong choice for organizations using Red Hat's cloud solutions, particularly those focusing on security, compliance, and efficient container management.

Why this product is good

  • RKT (Red Hat Quay and OpenShift Container Registry) is considered good due to its robust features in container management, such as secure image distribution, vulnerability scanning, and role-based access controls. It's part of the Red Hat ecosystem, offering seamless integration with other Red Hat products and services, making it a reliable choice for enterprises seeking secure and scalable container solutions.

Recommended for

  • Companies already using Red Hat platforms
  • Organizations requiring comprehensive security and compliance features
  • Development teams looking for integrated tools for container lifecycle management
  • Enterprises focusing on scalability and robust container infrastructure

rkt videos

+ Add

RKT IPO Review | Is Rocket a Buy for 2020? | Matt Mulvihill

More videos:

  • Review - 2018 Niner RKT 9 RDO - First Look and Build Kit Overview
  • Review - Best Stock Picks Today | RKT Stock 9-2-20

SolidCP videos

+ Add

SolidCP General Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to add and delete a website in SolidCP control panel?
  • Tutorial - How To Assign a Dedicated Application Pool To a Website In SolidCP Control Panel?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to rkt and SolidCP)

rkt

SolidCP

Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
Control Panels
0 0%
Control Panels
100% 100
Cloud Storage
100 100%
Cloud Storage
0% 0
Hosting
0 0%
Hosting
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using rkt and SolidCP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare rkt and SolidCP

rkt Reviews

5 Container Alternatives to Docker
In 2018, 12 percent of production containers were rkt (pronounced “Rocket”). Rkt supports two types of images: Docker and appc. A selling point of rkt is its pod-based process that works out of the box with Kubernetes (also referred to as “rktnetes”). In Kubernetes, an rkt container runtime can easily be specified:
Source: containerjournal.com

SolidCP Reviews

We have no reviews of SolidCP yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SolidCP seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

rkt mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of rkt yet. Tracking of rkt recommendations started around Mar 2021.

SolidCP mentions (2)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing rkt and SolidCP, you can also consider the following products

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

cPanel - With its first-class support and rich feature set, cPanel & WHM has been the web hosting industry's most reliable, intuitive control panel since 1997.

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Vesta Control Panel - – What I love about Vesta is that it's fast and easy to use

Apache ServiceMix - Apache ServiceMix is an open source ESB that combines the functionality of a Service Oriented Architecture and the modularity.

Webmin - Webmin is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix.

Loading...