Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

rkt VS Seaweed FS

Compare rkt VS Seaweed FS and see what are their differences

Serverspace.io
Serverspace offers automated, simple, and affordable cloud infrastructure to everyone. Get started building your cool digital stuff right now. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

rkt logo rkt

App Container runtime

Seaweed FS logo Seaweed FS

SeaweedFS is a simple and highly scalable distributed file system to store and serve billions of files fast! SeaweedFS object store has O(1) disk seek and SeaweedFS Filer supports cross-cluster replication, POSIX, S3 API, ,…
  • rkt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-08
  • Seaweed FS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-10

rkt videos

+ Add

RKT IPO Review | Is Rocket a Buy for 2020? | Matt Mulvihill

More videos:

  • Review - 2018 Niner RKT 9 RDO - First Look and Build Kit Overview
  • Review - Best Stock Picks Today | RKT Stock 9-2-20

Seaweed FS videos

No Seaweed FS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to rkt and Seaweed FS)

rkt

Seaweed FS

Cloud Computing
46 46%
Cloud Computing
54% 54
Cloud Storage
35 35%
Cloud Storage
65% 65
Storage
52 52%
Storage
48% 48
File Sharing
0 0%
File Sharing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using rkt and Seaweed FS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare rkt and Seaweed FS

rkt Reviews

5 Container Alternatives to Docker
In 2018, 12 percent of production containers were rkt (pronounced “Rocket”). Rkt supports two types of images: Docker and appc. A selling point of rkt is its pod-based process that works out of the box with Kubernetes (also referred to as “rktnetes”). In Kubernetes, an rkt container runtime can easily be specified:
Source: containerjournal.com

Seaweed FS Reviews

We have no reviews of Seaweed FS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Seaweed FS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 35 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

rkt mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of rkt yet. Tracking of rkt recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Seaweed FS mentions (35)

  • Show HN: OpenSign – The open source alternative to DocuSign
    > Theoretically they could swap with minio but last time we used it it was not a drop-in replacement yet. Depends on whether AGPL v3 works for you or not (or whether you decide to pay them), I guess: https://min.io/pricing I've actually been looking for more open alternatives, but haven't found much. Zenko CloudServer seemed to be somewhat promising, but doesn't seem to be managed very actively:... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • The Tailscale Universal Docker Mod
    Wireguard + GUI: https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy Backups of mail accounts: https://www.offlineimap.org Cloud storage for phones: http://nextcloud.com Mirroring podcasts locally: https://github.com/akhilrex/podgrab My own matrix instance: https://matrix-org.github.io/dendrite/ Backups: https://restic.net Media Management: https://jellyfin.org Relay only tor help: https://www.torproject.org S3 compatible storage:... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Google Cloud Storage FUSE
    JuiceFS is mostly POSIX compatible, but there are important caveats to that like no ACL, copying files changes their mtime (which impacts backup tools), has "close-to-open" consistency (which makes it dangerous for log appenders). Choosing an appropriate solution in this space still depends on what you need to do with the storage, and some options are MooseFS https://github.com/moosefs/moosefs, Curve... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • My Experience Self Hosting
    Supabase-Storage uses an S3 compatible API and is ultimately just middleware for it. So, the redundancy would be at the storage backend systems. Seems like the majority of s3 compatible selfhosted systems are built for redundancy/high-availability. With only a brief read of docs, and in no particular order: Https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/documentation/quick-start/ Https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs CEPH... Source: about 1 year ago
  • Open source cloud file system. Posix, HDFS and S3 compatible
    Adopted SeaweedFS few months back. Never looked back since then. It's fast even on HDD disks. https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs#introduction. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing rkt and Seaweed FS, you can also consider the following products

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability

Apache ServiceMix - Apache ServiceMix is an open source ESB that combines the functionality of a Service Oriented Architecture and the modularity.

Loading...