Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

rkt VS Quobyte

Compare rkt VS Quobyte and see what are their differences

Bunny.net
BunnyCDN is a simple and powerful CDN, offering lightning fast performance for a fraction of the cost with free SSL, Brotli, HTTP/2 and 100% Pay As You Go pricing. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

rkt logo rkt

App Container runtime

Quobyte logo Quobyte

Quobyte is a parallel POSIX file system with block and object storage capabilities.
  • rkt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-08
  • Quobyte Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-25

rkt videos

+ Add

RKT IPO Review | Is Rocket a Buy for 2020? | Matt Mulvihill

More videos:

  • Review - 2018 Niner RKT 9 RDO - First Look and Build Kit Overview
  • Review - Best Stock Picks Today | RKT Stock 9-2-20

Quobyte videos

+ Add

How It Works: Quobyte Architecture and Use Cases

More videos:

  • Review - Quobyte - Storage Infrastructure for the Data Center - inovex Meetups

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to rkt and Quobyte)

rkt

Quobyte

Cloud Computing
74 74%
Cloud Computing
26% 26
Cloud Storage
68 68%
Cloud Storage
32% 32
Storage
66 66%
Storage
34% 34
Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using rkt and Quobyte. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare rkt and Quobyte

rkt Reviews

5 Container Alternatives to Docker
In 2018, 12 percent of production containers were rkt (pronounced “Rocket”). Rkt supports two types of images: Docker and appc. A selling point of rkt is its pod-based process that works out of the box with Kubernetes (also referred to as “rktnetes”). In Kubernetes, an rkt container runtime can easily be specified:
Source: containerjournal.com

Quobyte Reviews

Ceph Storage Platform Alternatives in 2022
Three key aspects of Quobyte software distinguish it from other offerings. No. 1 is its linear scaling. Doubling the node count doubles the performance, it’s as simple as that. No. 2 is unified storage, which allows multiple users to simultaneously work on the same file regardless of the access protocol being used. No. 3 is the system’s ability to monitor, maintain, and heal...
Source: www.teimouri.net

What are some alternatives?

When comparing rkt and Quobyte, you can also consider the following products

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability

Apache ServiceMix - Apache ServiceMix is an open source ESB that combines the functionality of a Service Oriented Architecture and the modularity.

Sheepdog - Sheepdog is a distributed object storage system for volume and container services and manages the...

Loading...