Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

rkt VS Longhorn

Compare rkt VS Longhorn and see what are their differences

rkt logo rkt

App Container runtime

Longhorn logo Longhorn

Container-based distributed block storage
  • rkt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-08
  • Longhorn Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-17

rkt features and specs

  • Compatibility
    rkt supports the App Container (appc) spec and can also run Docker container images, providing flexibility and compatibility with various container formats.
  • Security
    rkt is designed with security in mind, offering features like process isolation through Linux namespaces, user namespaces, and SELinux/AppArmor integration.
  • Isolation
    rkt runs applications in their own stage1 environments, ensuring strong isolation between containers and better resource management.
  • Modularity
    rkt is built with a modular architecture, allowing users to swap out the stage1 implementation to better fit their needs.
  • Lightweight
    rkt avoids running a central daemon, thus using fewer system resources and simplifying debugging and monitoring.

Possible disadvantages of rkt

  • Maturity
    rkt is not as mature as Docker, meaning it may lack some features and integrations that have been developed for Docker.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    rkt has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Docker, which may limit the availability of third-party tools and support.
  • Adoption
    rkt has lower adoption rates, leading to fewer tutorials, guides, and community-driven content, which can make the learning curve steeper.
  • Development Activity
    rkt's development and maintenance activity is not as high as Docker's, which could impact long-term viability and feature development.
  • Enterprise Support
    Enterprise-grade support and services for rkt may not be as widely available or comprehensive as those for Docker.

Longhorn features and specs

  • Open Source
    Longhorn is an open-source project, which ensures that it is freely available for anyone to use, modify, and distribute. This encourages community collaboration and contribution, allowing for continuous improvement and shared innovation.
  • Cloud Native
    Designed specifically for containerized environments, Longhorn integrates well with Kubernetes, providing storage solutions that are optimized for cloud-native applications.
  • Lightweight
    Longhorn is known for being lightweight, which allows it to add persistent storage capabilities to Kubernetes clusters without significant overhead, maintaining performance efficiency.
  • Ease of Use
    It offers a user-friendly interface for managing storage and is easy to deploy, making it accessible for users who may not be deeply familiar with complex storage systems.
  • Automatic Backups
    Longhorn supports automatic scheduled backups, which helps in data protection and ensures that storage can be recovered easily in case of failures.

Possible disadvantages of Longhorn

  • Limited Features Compared to Enterprise Solutions
    While Longhorn provides essential storage functionalities, it might lack some advanced features available in more established enterprise storage solutions, such as advanced analytics or extensive integration options.
  • Resource Consumption
    Longhorn, while lightweight compared to some alternatives, still consumes resources and may require careful management to avoid impacting performance on clusters with heavy workloads.
  • Reliance on Kubernetes
    Longhorn is tightly integrated with Kubernetes, which means its benefits are most relevant to Kubernetes users. Those not using Kubernetes may find limited applicability.
  • Complex Recovery Scenarios
    In certain complex failure scenarios, recovering data can be challenging, potentially requiring manual intervention and a good understanding of both Longhorn and Kubernetes internals.

Analysis of rkt

Overall verdict

  • Overall, RKT is a strong choice for organizations using Red Hat's cloud solutions, particularly those focusing on security, compliance, and efficient container management.

Why this product is good

  • RKT (Red Hat Quay and OpenShift Container Registry) is considered good due to its robust features in container management, such as secure image distribution, vulnerability scanning, and role-based access controls. It's part of the Red Hat ecosystem, offering seamless integration with other Red Hat products and services, making it a reliable choice for enterprises seeking secure and scalable container solutions.

Recommended for

  • Companies already using Red Hat platforms
  • Organizations requiring comprehensive security and compliance features
  • Development teams looking for integrated tools for container lifecycle management
  • Enterprises focusing on scalability and robust container infrastructure

rkt videos

RKT IPO Review | Is Rocket a Buy for 2020? | Matt Mulvihill

More videos:

  • Review - 2018 Niner RKT 9 RDO - First Look and Build Kit Overview
  • Review - Best Stock Picks Today | RKT Stock 9-2-20

Longhorn videos

2019 Ram 1500 Laramie Longhorn Review - The Mercedes S Class for Cowboys

More videos:

  • Review - Restaurant Review - LongHorn Steakhouse | Atlanta Eats
  • Review - Longhorn Steakhouse Wings Food Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to rkt and Longhorn)
Cloud Computing
70 70%
30% 30
Cloud Storage
68 68%
32% 32
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Storage
64 64%
36% 36

User comments

Share your experience with using rkt and Longhorn. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare rkt and Longhorn

rkt Reviews

5 Container Alternatives to Docker
In 2018, 12 percent of production containers were rkt (pronounced “Rocket”). Rkt supports two types of images: Docker and appc. A selling point of rkt is its pod-based process that works out of the box with Kubernetes (also referred to as “rktnetes”). In Kubernetes, an rkt container runtime can easily be specified:

Longhorn Reviews

We have no reviews of Longhorn yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Longhorn seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

rkt mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of rkt yet. Tracking of rkt recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Longhorn mentions (6)

  • Awesome Kubernetes Resources !!! 🔥
    💚Longhorn 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 - Longhorn is a distributed block storage system for Kubernetes. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Diskomator – NVMe-TCP at your fingertips
    I'm looking forward to Longhorn[1] taking advantage of this technology. [1]: https://github.com/longhorn/longhorn. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • What alternatives are there to Longhorn?
    What backup store you were using? S3 or NFS? Have you tried to report your issues to https://github.com/longhorn/longhorn? Longhorn maintainers/contributors will definitely help with any issues reported by the community. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Top 200 Kubernetes Tools for DevOps Engineer Like You
    ChubaoFS - distributed file system and object storage Longhorn - Cloud-Native distributed block storage built on and for Kubernetes OpenEBS - Kubernetes native - hyperconverged block storage with multiple storage engines Rook - Storage Orchestration for Kubernetes SeaweedFS - Distributed file system supports read-write many volumes TiKV - Distributed transactional key-value database Velero - Backup... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Rancher Desktop, a Docker Desktop Replacement
    They've also got Longhorn, a distributed container-attached storage solution that's very simple to understand and easy to deploy. Performance is another thing but that's the same with all of the general networked storage solutions (Ceph included). Rancher's got a well deserved good impression in my mind, though early on I avoided it since it seemed like they were building a walled garden. [0]:... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing rkt and Longhorn, you can also consider the following products

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Seaweed FS - SeaweedFS is a simple and highly scalable distributed file system to store and serve billions of files fast! SeaweedFS object store has O(1) disk seek and SeaweedFS Filer supports cross-cluster replication, POSIX, S3 API, ,…

Apache ServiceMix - Apache ServiceMix is an open source ESB that combines the functionality of a Service Oriented Architecture and the modularity.

containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability