Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

RhodeCode VS Launchpad.net

Compare RhodeCode VS Launchpad.net and see what are their differences

RhodeCode logo RhodeCode

Enterprise source code management platform for behind-the-firewall Mercurial, Git & Subversion. Secure and Open Source.

Launchpad.net logo Launchpad.net

Launchpad is a software collaboration platform by Canonical
  • RhodeCode Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16
  • Launchpad.net Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

RhodeCode features and specs

  • Unified Repository Management
    RhodeCode supports Git, Mercurial, and Subversion repositories, providing a flexible solution for organizations using multiple version control systems.
  • Enhanced Security
    It includes fine-grained permissions and access controls, ensuring robust security for repositories and code bases.
  • Enterprise Features
    It offers features like audit logs, compliance support, and LDAP/Active Directory integration, which are crucial for enterprise environments.
  • Integrations
    RhodeCode integrates with popular tools like Jira, Jenkins, and Slack, enhancing collaboration and workflow automation.
  • Self-hosted
    Being self-hosted, RhodeCode provides full control over data, which is essential for organizations with strict compliance or security requirements.
  • Community and Support
    RhodeCode offers a strong community support and comprehensive documentation, along with professional support options.

Possible disadvantages of RhodeCode

  • Complexity
    Setting up and maintaining a self-hosted instance can be complex and resource-intensive, requiring experienced personnel.
  • Cost
    While there is a community edition, the enterprise edition with the full feature set can be expensive.
  • User Interface
    Some users might find the user interface less intuitive compared to modern cloud-based solutions like GitHub or GitLab.
  • Performance
    Depending on the server infrastructure, performance might lag when handling very large repositories or a high number of concurrent users.
  • Limited Cloud Options
    Unlike some competitors, RhodeCode does not offer a fully managed cloud-hosted version, which could be a drawback for those looking for minimal maintenance.
  • Learning Curve
    New users or those unfamiliar with hosted version control systems might face a steep learning curve when adopting RhodeCode.

Launchpad.net features and specs

  • Integrated Development Environment
    Launchpad provides a suite of tools to manage projects, bugs, and code, streamlining the development lifecycle.
  • Bug Tracking System
    It offers a robust bug tracking system that facilitates reporting, managing, and fixing bugs, enhancing project quality.
  • Bazaar Version Control
    Launchpad supports the Bazaar version control system, allowing easy collaboration and branch management.
  • Translation Management
    The platform includes a translation tool that helps manage and integrate translations in multiple languages.
  • PPA Hosting
    Launchpad provides Personal Package Archives (PPAs) hosting, which makes it easier to distribute software packages.
  • Community and Collaboration
    It fosters a strong community environment, enabling developers to collaborate effectively on open-source projects.
  • Integration with Ubuntu
    Launchpad integrates closely with Ubuntu, making it the go-to platform for many Ubuntu-related projects and packages.
  • Free for Open-Source Projects
    It is free to use for open-source projects, making it accessible for developers working on non-commercial initiatives.

Possible disadvantages of Launchpad.net

  • Limited Version Control Options
    Launchpad primarily focuses on the Bazaar version control system, which is less popular compared to Git, and does not natively support Git as seamlessly as other platforms.
  • User Interface
    Some users find the Launchpad user interface to be less intuitive and harder to navigate compared to other platforms like GitHub or GitLab.
  • Performance Issues
    Occasionally, users report performance issues and slow response times on the platform, which can hinder productivity.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    There is a steep learning curve for new users, particularly those unfamiliar with Bazaar or the platform's unique features.
  • Less Popular
    It is less popular than alternatives like GitHub or GitLab, which means fewer available resources, fewer integrations, and a smaller community.
  • Limited Enterprise Features
    Launchpad lacks some of the advanced enterprise features available in paid versions of other platforms, such as detailed access controls and integration with enterprise software.
  • Dependency on Ubuntu
    The platform's close integration with Ubuntu can be a limitation for projects that are not tied to the Ubuntu ecosystem.

RhodeCode videos

Introduction to RhodeCode - Part 1. Installation

More videos:

  • Review - Rhodecode issue 372

Launchpad.net videos

Review: LaunchPad X vs MINI MK3 // Custom layout tutorial // Novation LaunchPad

More videos:

  • Review - Novation Launchpad MK2 Review
  • Review - LAUNCHPAD X – What is it and what can it do?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RhodeCode and Launchpad.net)
Git
44 44%
56% 56
Code Collaboration
37 37%
63% 63
Project Management
54 54%
46% 46
Software Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using RhodeCode and Launchpad.net. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare RhodeCode and Launchpad.net

RhodeCode Reviews

We have no reviews of RhodeCode yet.
Be the first one to post

Launchpad.net Reviews

The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives
Launchpad is a collaborative development platform primarily used for the Ubuntu operating system and other open-source projects. Created by Canonical Ltd., Launchpad offers services to make software development easier, including bug tracking, code reviews, and translations. We explicitly indicate this is the Canonical project because German software giant SAP has a tool with...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Launchpad.net seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 66 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RhodeCode mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RhodeCode yet. Tracking of RhodeCode recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Launchpad.net mentions (66)

  • Rust in QEMU Roadmap
    I think I'm missing why you need to require using the toolchain bundled with the last stable Debian release vs having devs just rustup the latest version of the toolchain (or via a PPA [1] or however else they want to install it). The current approach basically guarantees that you're always targeting a ~2-4 year old version of the toolchain and that feels like a particularly weird maintenance burden given how many... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Popover API
    This doesn’t sound right at all. Ubuntu itself doesn’t have an ESR package, only https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/firefox which is at 125. The Mozilla PPA does have an ESR package, but per https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa?field.series_filter=focal it’s at 115. has been supported since Firefox 98, meaning ESR 91 was the last release lacking it, and it reached end of support... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Quickemu: Quickly run optimised Windows, macOS and Linux virtual machines
    I agree, but I think that model of GPG is not how it's used any more. I think nowadays people upload a one-shot CI key, which is used to sign builds. So you're basically saying "The usual machine built this". Which is good information, don't get me wrong, but it's much less secure than "John was logged into his laptop and entered the password for the key that signed this" So, you're right, that GPG verifies... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Mozilla's new Firefox Linux package for Ubuntu and Debian derivatives
    You can use https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/, but that's no official Mozilla repository. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Mozilla's new Firefox Linux package for Ubuntu and Debian derivatives
    As a user of the PPA packages (https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa), now I'm confused. Are these the same packages? Should I switch? I'd have appreciated at least a mention in the article. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RhodeCode and Launchpad.net, you can also consider the following products

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

GitBucket - GitBucket is the easily installable open-source GitHub clone written with Scala.

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

SourceForge - The Complete Open-Source and Business Software Platform.