Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

RhodeCode VS Atlassian Bitbucket Server

Compare RhodeCode VS Atlassian Bitbucket Server and see what are their differences

RhodeCode logo RhodeCode

Enterprise source code management platform for behind-the-firewall Mercurial, Git & Subversion. Secure and Open Source.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server logo Atlassian Bitbucket Server

Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.
  • RhodeCode Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16
  • Atlassian Bitbucket Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30

RhodeCode features and specs

  • Unified Repository Management
    RhodeCode supports Git, Mercurial, and Subversion repositories, providing a flexible solution for organizations using multiple version control systems.
  • Enhanced Security
    It includes fine-grained permissions and access controls, ensuring robust security for repositories and code bases.
  • Enterprise Features
    It offers features like audit logs, compliance support, and LDAP/Active Directory integration, which are crucial for enterprise environments.
  • Integrations
    RhodeCode integrates with popular tools like Jira, Jenkins, and Slack, enhancing collaboration and workflow automation.
  • Self-hosted
    Being self-hosted, RhodeCode provides full control over data, which is essential for organizations with strict compliance or security requirements.
  • Community and Support
    RhodeCode offers a strong community support and comprehensive documentation, along with professional support options.

Possible disadvantages of RhodeCode

  • Complexity
    Setting up and maintaining a self-hosted instance can be complex and resource-intensive, requiring experienced personnel.
  • Cost
    While there is a community edition, the enterprise edition with the full feature set can be expensive.
  • User Interface
    Some users might find the user interface less intuitive compared to modern cloud-based solutions like GitHub or GitLab.
  • Performance
    Depending on the server infrastructure, performance might lag when handling very large repositories or a high number of concurrent users.
  • Limited Cloud Options
    Unlike some competitors, RhodeCode does not offer a fully managed cloud-hosted version, which could be a drawback for those looking for minimal maintenance.
  • Learning Curve
    New users or those unfamiliar with hosted version control systems might face a steep learning curve when adopting RhodeCode.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server features and specs

  • Scalability
    Bitbucket Server can be scaled easily to support large and growing teams, making it suitable for enterprises.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other Atlassian products like Jira and Confluence, enhancing productivity and collaboration.
  • Data Control
    Being self-hosted, Bitbucket Server allows organizations to have complete control over their data and security settings.
  • Customization
    Support for custom hooks and add-ons allows for high levels of customization to meet specific workflow requirements.
  • Performance
    Optimized for performance to handle large repositories and numerous concurrent users efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of Atlassian Bitbucket Server

  • Cost
    The cost for the data center edition can be high, especially for smaller teams or startups.
  • Maintenance
    Requires dedicated resources for server maintenance, updates, and troubleshooting, adding to the operational overhead.
  • Complexity
    Setup and configuration can be complex, often necessitating specialized knowledge or training.
  • Limited Cloud Features
    May lack some features and the ease of use found in cloud-based solutions, which can be a drawback for teams looking for a more straightforward setup.
  • Resource Intensive
    Can be resource-intensive, requiring powerful hardware to run efficiently, especially for larger installations.

RhodeCode videos

Introduction to RhodeCode - Part 1. Installation

More videos:

  • Review - Rhodecode issue 372

Atlassian Bitbucket Server videos

No Atlassian Bitbucket Server videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RhodeCode and Atlassian Bitbucket Server)
Git
45 45%
55% 55
Code Collaboration
40 40%
60% 60
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0
Version Control
39 39%
61% 61

User comments

Share your experience with using RhodeCode and Atlassian Bitbucket Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RhodeCode and Atlassian Bitbucket Server, you can also consider the following products

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.

GitBucket - GitBucket is the easily installable open-source GitHub clone written with Scala.

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.