Reviewable
Gerrit Code Review
Phabricator
Review Board
Atlassian Crucible
GitHub
SonarQube
BitBucket
Doczilla
PDFShift
pdflayer
DocRaptor
Doppio.sh
PDFCrowd
ScreenshotOne
Visual Studio Code
Reviewable DoczillaNo features have been listed yet.
No Doczilla videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Doczilla's answer:
At Doczilla, we embarked on a mission driven by necessity. Faced with the challenge of converting HTML into polished documents and images, we scoured the landscape for a solution that aligned perfectly with our needs. Surprisingly, we found none that matched our specific use case.
Our platform is our response to this gap. We've designed a fully managed API dedicated to simplifying the creation of PDFs and screenshots.
Well written docs, easy to use.
Based on our record, Reviewable seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Reviewable.io — Code review for GitHub repositories, free for public or personal repos. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable (https://reviewable.io) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing, not only for large files (we support larger files than GitHub does) but also for understanding that diff. Have you ever reviewed a PR twice, but the second time around all your comments are gone and you... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Https://reviewable.io is the earliest full-powered Critique alternative for GitHub. It supports some cool things Critique doesn't/didn't, such as reviewing multi-commit branches (also across history-rewriting force-push cleanups), and indicating exactly the nature of your comment (just FYI, or you want this to be changed before you'll give your approval). (I was an intern in the initial making of Critique, and... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
The linux kernel, which is open source and does want contributors, is doing more-or-less just fine with an email-based PR and review flow. If it's an open source project, it should be using an open source review platform that allows improvements and specialization of the code hosting too. Using github, where the review tools are bad and can't be improved by an outsider, is a slap in the face to open source.... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
>See reviewer presence so that you can see if someone is already reviewing and avoid unnecessary pings. >Visibly values privacy and security above all else These two things seem squarely at odds. Personally, I don't want my code review tool announcing to developers when I'm looking at their PR. The fact that it's a Chrome extension would also be a big blocker for me. I run a dev team, and I wouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
Gerrit Code Review - OpenSource Git Code Review Tool
PDFShift - Convert any HTML documents to high-fidelity PDF using a single POST request
Phabricator - Phacility - Phabricator
pdflayer - Free, powerful HTML to PDF API supporting both URL and raw HTML conversion. Unlimited document size, lightning-fast and compatible PHP, Python, Ruby, etc.
Review Board - Stress-free code review for teams of all sizes
DocRaptor - As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more