Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Reviewable VS CircleCI

Compare Reviewable VS CircleCI and see what are their differences

Reviewable logo Reviewable

GitHub code review platform.

CircleCI logo CircleCI

CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.
  • Reviewable Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-03
  • CircleCI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05

Reviewable videos

Reviewable -- what is the fastest way to check out your review code?

CircleCI videos

CircleCI Part 1: Introduction to Unit Testing and Continuous Integration

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Setup CircleCI On Your Next Project (Vue, React, or Angular)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Reviewable and CircleCI)
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
100% 100
Code Review
100 100%
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Reviewable and CircleCI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Reviewable and CircleCI

Reviewable Reviews

We have no reviews of Reviewable yet.
Be the first one to post

CircleCI Reviews

35+ Of The Best CI/CD Tools: Organized By Category
CircleCI is a complete CI/CD pipeline tool. You can monitor the statuses of your various pipelines from your dashboard. Additionally, CircleCI helps you manage your build logs, access controls, and testing. It’s one of the most popular DevOps and CI/CD platforms in the world.
10 Jenkins Alternatives in 2021 for Developers
CircleCI is generally recognized for its flexibility and compatibility. Customization is obviously an important factor when making the switch from Jenkins and CircleCI certainly takes an impressive swing at providing users with a solid collection of features.
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
CircleCI is a flexible tool with easy maintenance and can run in almost any environment. Every commit leads to automatic build execution. To add to it, if any new build is triggered, any queued or running build is automatically canceled.
Continuous Integration. CircleCI vs Travis CI vs Jenkins
Now, when the process of continuous integration is clear (I hope so) we can move to the comparison of some of the most popular CI platforms nowadays. Each of those has its pros and cons. Let’s start with CircleCI.
Source: djangostars.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CircleCI should be more popular than Reviewable. It has been mentiond 62 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Reviewable mentions (21)

  • A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev
    Reviewable.io — Code review for GitHub repositories, free for public or personal repos. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • The GitHub for Code Review UI Needs Serious Innovation
    Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable (https://reviewable.io) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing, not only for large files (we support larger files than GitHub does) but also for understanding that diff. Have you ever reviewed a PR twice, but the second time around all your comments are gone and you... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Software Engineering at Google
    Https://reviewable.io is the earliest full-powered Critique alternative for GitHub. It supports some cool things Critique doesn't/didn't, such as reviewing multi-commit branches (also across history-rewriting force-push cleanups), and indicating exactly the nature of your comment (just FYI, or you want this to be changed before you'll give your approval). (I was an intern in the initial making of Critique, and... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Codereview: Should the Go project stop importing GitHub PRs?
    The linux kernel, which is open source and does want contributors, is doing more-or-less just fine with an email-based PR and review flow. If it's an open source project, it should be using an open source review platform that allows improvements and specialization of the code hosting too. Using github, where the review tools are bad and can't be improved by an outsider, is a slap in the face to open source.... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Show HN: Visibly – More Collaborative and Efficient Code Reviews on GitHub
    >See reviewer presence so that you can see if someone is already reviewing and avoid unnecessary pings. >Visibly values privacy and security above all else These two things seem squarely at odds. Personally, I don't want my code review tool announcing to developers when I'm looking at their PR. The fact that it's a Chrome extension would also be a big blocker for me. I run a dev team, and I wouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
View more

CircleCI mentions (62)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Reviewable and CircleCI, you can also consider the following products

Gerrit Code Review - OpenSource Git Code Review Tool

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Phabricator - Phacility - Phabricator

Travis CI - Focus on writing code. Let Travis CI take care of running your tests and deploying your apps.

Review Board - Stress-free code review for teams of all sizes

Codeship - Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.