Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

RePix VS Backbone.js

Compare RePix VS Backbone.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

RePix logo RePix

RePix helps you in batch resizing any image into a preset resolution and save it easily and quickly.

Backbone.js logo Backbone.js

Give your JS App some Backbone with Models, Views, Collections, and Events
  • RePix Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-29
  • Backbone.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30

RePix features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    RePix offers a simple and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users of all experience levels to edit photos quickly and efficiently.
  • Variety of Editing Tools
    The platform provides a wide range of editing tools, including filters, cropping, and enhancements, that enable users to customize their photos extensively.
  • Fast Processing Speed
    RePix is known for its fast processing speed, allowing users to apply edits and effects to their photos almost instantaneously.
  • Affordable Pricing
    Compared to other photo editing software, RePix offers competitive pricing, making it accessible to a broader range of users.
  • Cloud Integration
    RePix integrates seamlessly with various cloud services, ensuring users can easily save and access their photos from anywhere.

Possible disadvantages of RePix

  • Limited Advanced Features
    While RePix offers a variety of basic editing tools, it lacks some of the more advanced features found in professional photo editing software.
  • Occasional Performance Issues
    Some users have reported occasional performance issues, such as crashes or slowdowns, especially when working with high-resolution images.
  • Internet Dependency
    As RePix heavily relies on cloud integration, an active internet connection is necessary for full functionality, which may be inconvenient for some users.
  • Limited Customization Options
    The platform might not offer as many customization options for filters and effects as some users might want for their specific needs.

Backbone.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Backbone.js is minimal and lightweight, which means it has a small footprint and adds very little overhead to your project.
  • Flexibility
    Backbone.js provides a flexible structure to developers by allowing them to build their own MVC or MVP architectures using models, views, collections, and routers.
  • Ease of Integration
    Backbone.js can be easily integrated with other libraries and frameworks, such as jQuery or underscore.js, enhancing its capabilities without much difficulty.
  • Large Community
    Backbone.js has been around for a long time, resulting in a large community and a plethora of plugins and extensions that can be leveraged.
  • Detailed Documentation
    The official site offers comprehensive documentation which includes tutorials, examples, and a detailed API reference, aiding developers to understand and utilize the library efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of Backbone.js

  • Steeper Learning Curve
    New developers might find Backbone.js difficult to learn due to its non-opinionated nature and lack of enforced structure.
  • Sparse In-Built Features
    Backbone.js provides only the basic building blocks, requiring developers to write more boilerplate code or rely on external libraries for additional functionalities.
  • Outdated
    As newer frameworks and libraries (like React, Vue, and Angular) have emerged with more robust features and better performance, Backbone.js has somewhat fallen out of favor in modern development practices.
  • Event Binding Complexity
    Managing event bindings in Backbone.js can become complex and sometimes messy in large applications, which can lead to difficult maintenance and debugging.
  • Limited Two-Way Data Binding
    Backbone.js does not provide two-way data binding out-of-the-box, unlike other frameworks such as Angular, necessitating additional code to sync views and models.

RePix videos

Repix App Tutorial & Review for iPhone & iPad - The Inspiring Photo Editor

More videos:

  • Review - Repix - Remix & Paint Photos iPhone App Review
  • Review - Repix: A Photo Editor for iOS

Backbone.js videos

Introduction to Backbone.js

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Backbone.js
  • Review - Backbone.js Code Review w Backbone.js Mentor Jonathon

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RePix and Backbone.js)
Digital Drawing And Painting
JavaScript Framework
0 0%
100% 100
Web App
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using RePix and Backbone.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare RePix and Backbone.js

RePix Reviews

We have no reviews of RePix yet.
Be the first one to post

Backbone.js Reviews

20 Next.js Alternatives Worth Considering
A veteran on the scene, Backbone.js is all about giving structure to your JavaScript-heavy applications. It’s standing the test of time, enabling you to keep your data logic and display logic neatly side by side, all while being lightweight.
9 Best JavaScript Frameworks to Use in 2023
Backbone.js is based on the Model View Controller (MVC) design pattern. The library supports seven components: Models, Views, Collections, Routers, Events, Sync, and Options. Backbone.js also provides an asynchronous communication layer that allows the application to communicate with a backend service.
Source: ninetailed.io
JavaScript: What Are The Most Used Frameworks For This Language?
Backbone.JS is a lightweight JavaScript library that provides a framework for developing structured and scalable web applications. It offers a set of tools for building client-side applications that interact with RESTful APIs. Backbone.JS is well-suited for developing single-page applications (SPAs) where most of the user interface is rendered in the browser, rather than...
Source: www.bocasay.com
20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Backbone.js is a JavaScript-based framework that connects to an API via a RESTful JSON interface. Backbone.js is known for being small and light because it only requires jQuery and one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, to use the entire library.
Top JavaScript Frameworks For Mobile App Development
Backbone JS is a JavaScript framework based on the MVP app design. As the name suggests, it acts as a strong backbone to your project. It is lightweight in nature and hence, is considered ideal for developing single-page applications. It offers a simplistic frontend and makes the best use of JavaScript functions.
Source: medium.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Backbone.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RePix mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RePix yet. Tracking of RePix recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Backbone.js mentions (17)

  • JavaScript Views, the Hard Way – A Pattern for Writing UI
    Https://backbonejs.org/#View There is also a github repo that has examples of MVC patterns adapted to the web platform. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • JavaScript evolution: From Lodash and Underscore to vanilla
    Underscore was created by Jeremy Ashkenas (the creator of Backbone.js) in 2009 to provide a set of utility functions that JavaScript lacked at the time. It was also created to work with Backbone.js, but it slowly became a favorite among developers who needed utility functions that they could just call and get stuff done with without having to worry about the inner implementations and browser compatibility. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • React is 10 years old
    Got it thanks for the context. I've read the web app and it seems to me it is just https://backbonejs.org/ re-written in Typescript and allows JSX. I'm very certain Typescript and JSX will have improved the DX for Backbone like apps, but it doesn't address all of the other issues that teams had with Backbone. e.g. Cyclical event propagation, state stored in the DOM (i.e. Appendchild is error prone in large code... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Just Simply – Stop saying how simple things are in our docs
    Even further nowadays, docs are created using Docusaurus. I don't have problem with it but documentation should be good (eye) friendly than easy to write. Why not be creative while writing docs such as - Backbone.js - https://backbonejs.org Or https://backbonejs.org/docs/backbone.html as code annotation. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • The Emperor's New Library
    What we see, a decade ago, are that many of the "popular" libraries, frameworks, and methods, not surprisingly, have gone by the wayside, a lot that have remained in current code as difficult-to-removemodernize legacy cruft (Bower, Gulp, Grunt, Backbone, Angular 1, ...), and then we have the small minority that are still here. Some that remain have had their utility lessened/questioned by platform and language... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RePix and Backbone.js, you can also consider the following products

Waterlogue - Magically turn your photos into watercolor paintings.

AngularJS - AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.

Olli by Tinrocket - iOS camera app that creates beautiful animation and drawings

ExpressJS - Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple

EditedImages - The web's best photoshopped images

ember.js - A JavaScript framework for creating ambitious web apps