Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Redux.js VS Mu4e

Compare Redux.js VS Mu4e and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Redux.js logo Redux.js

Predictable state container for JavaScript apps

Mu4e logo Mu4e

Starting with version 0.9.8, mu provides an emacs-based e-mail client which uses mu as its back-end: mu4e.
  • Redux.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-17
  • Mu4e Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-26

Redux.js features and specs

  • Predictable State Management
    Redux provides a single source of truth for the state of your application, which makes it easier to manage and debug. The state changes in a predictable way, which helps in maintaining consistency across the application.
  • Ecosystem and Community
    Redux has a large community and a rich ecosystem of middleware, development tools, and libraries. This support can accelerate development and troubleshooting.
  • Time-Travel Debugging
    With tools like Redux DevTools, developers can leverage features such as action logging, hot-reloading, and time-travel debugging, helping to understand and trace state changes effectively.
  • Middleware Support
    Redux supports middleware that lets you intercept actions and perform side effects like API calls, logging, or modifying actions before they reach reducers. This makes handling asynchronous operations more manageable.
  • Compatibility with React
    Although Redux can be used with any front-end library or framework, it pairs particularly well with React. Libraries like React-Redux offer seamless integration, making it easier to bind React components to the Redux store.

Possible disadvantages of Redux.js

  • Boilerplate Code
    Redux often requires a significant amount of boilerplate code, including actions, reducers, and store configuration. This may result in more verbose code, especially for simple applications.
  • Learning Curve
    Understanding the principles of Redux, such as actions, reducers, and the store, along with concepts like immutability and pure functions, can be challenging for beginners.
  • Performance Overhead
    Due to its strict immutability principles and the frequent creation of new state objects, Redux can introduce performance overhead, especially in large applications with complex state management needs.
  • Rigid Structure
    While the rigid structure of Redux can enforce good practices, it can also be restrictive and inflexible for certain types of applications. Developers might find it cumbersome to work within the boilerplate constraints.
  • Not Always Necessary
    For simple or small applications, the complexity that Redux introduces can be overkill. In such cases, alternatives like the Context API in React or simpler state management solutions might be more appropriate.

Mu4e features and specs

  • Speed
    Mu4e is known for its fast search capabilities due to the underlying 'mu' engine, which is optimized to handle large volumes of emails efficiently.
  • Integration with Emacs
    Mu4e is built specifically for Emacs users, offering seamless integration and the ability to use Emacs' powerful editing features within the email client.
  • Lightweight
    Mu4e is lightweight and requires significantly fewer resources compared to many graphical email clients, making it an ideal choice for users who prefer minimalistic software.
  • Customization
    As part of the Emacs ecosystem, Mu4e can be highly customized to fit individual workflows, allowing users to tailor the interface and functionality extensively through Emacs Lisp.
  • Keyboard-centric
    Users can operate Mu4e effectively using keyboard shortcuts, which can enhance productivity for those who prefer keyboard navigation over mouse-driven interfaces.

Possible disadvantages of Mu4e

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For new users, especially those not familiar with Emacs, setting up and learning how to use Mu4e can be challenging and time-consuming.
  • Text-based Interface
    Mu4e lacks a modern graphical user interface, which may not appeal to users who prefer visually intuitive and styled interfaces found in traditional email clients.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to fully-featured email clients, Mu4e may lack certain advanced features out of the box, such as calendar integration or in-depth HTML email rendering.
  • Emacs Dependency
    Using Mu4e requires having Emacs installed and running, which may not be ideal for users who do not use or want to adopt Emacs for other tasks.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Properly configuring Mu4e can be complex and involves managing Emacs configuration files, which might be a barrier for users who prefer straightforward, GUI-based configuration methods.

Redux.js videos

No Redux.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Mu4e videos

MAKEUP REVIEW for MU4E aqua eyes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Redux.js and Mu4e)
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
Email
0 0%
100% 100
JS Library
100 100%
0% 0
Email Clients
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Redux.js and Mu4e. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Redux.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 189 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Redux.js mentions (189)

  • Very Basic - Redux
    If you need more in depth information check out the documentation. https://redux.js.org/ It's actually pretty great. - Source: dev.to / 6 days ago
  • Architecture and Design Patterns in Front-End
    In frontend, the most probably well-known approach is Flux and its most common implementation, Redux. This is an example of unidirectional data flow. - Source: dev.to / 14 days ago
  • Organisation of Data Flows
    The best known example of an architecture with unidirectional data flow is Flux and, as its implementation, Redux. - Source: dev.to / 26 days ago
  • Valentine’s Day Breakup: React Dumps Create React App
    CRA makes integrating libraries like Redux and React Router easy without requiring complex Webpack and Babel configurations. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • UmiJS: the Shaolin of web frameworks
    Dva. A plugin-based state management solution (Redux + Sagas). Also quite popular in narrow communities outside of the Umi world. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
View more

Mu4e mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Mu4e yet. Tracking of Mu4e recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Redux.js and Mu4e, you can also consider the following products

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

Mutt - Mutt is a small but very powerful text-based mail client for Unix operating systems.

react-context - Context provides a way to pass data through the component tree without having to pass props down manually at every level.

Alpine - Alpine is a fast, easy to use email client that is suitable for both the inexperienced email user...

Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps

Mailspring - Mailspring is a mail client for Mac, Windows and Linux.