Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Redux.js VS IBM MQ

Compare Redux.js VS IBM MQ and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Redux.js logo Redux.js

Predictable state container for JavaScript apps

IBM MQ logo IBM MQ

IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.
  • Redux.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-17
  • IBM MQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-03

Redux.js features and specs

  • Predictable State Management
    Redux provides a single source of truth for the state of your application, which makes it easier to manage and debug. The state changes in a predictable way, which helps in maintaining consistency across the application.
  • Ecosystem and Community
    Redux has a large community and a rich ecosystem of middleware, development tools, and libraries. This support can accelerate development and troubleshooting.
  • Time-Travel Debugging
    With tools like Redux DevTools, developers can leverage features such as action logging, hot-reloading, and time-travel debugging, helping to understand and trace state changes effectively.
  • Middleware Support
    Redux supports middleware that lets you intercept actions and perform side effects like API calls, logging, or modifying actions before they reach reducers. This makes handling asynchronous operations more manageable.
  • Compatibility with React
    Although Redux can be used with any front-end library or framework, it pairs particularly well with React. Libraries like React-Redux offer seamless integration, making it easier to bind React components to the Redux store.

Possible disadvantages of Redux.js

  • Boilerplate Code
    Redux often requires a significant amount of boilerplate code, including actions, reducers, and store configuration. This may result in more verbose code, especially for simple applications.
  • Learning Curve
    Understanding the principles of Redux, such as actions, reducers, and the store, along with concepts like immutability and pure functions, can be challenging for beginners.
  • Performance Overhead
    Due to its strict immutability principles and the frequent creation of new state objects, Redux can introduce performance overhead, especially in large applications with complex state management needs.
  • Rigid Structure
    While the rigid structure of Redux can enforce good practices, it can also be restrictive and inflexible for certain types of applications. Developers might find it cumbersome to work within the boilerplate constraints.
  • Not Always Necessary
    For simple or small applications, the complexity that Redux introduces can be overkill. In such cases, alternatives like the Context API in React or simpler state management solutions might be more appropriate.

IBM MQ features and specs

  • Reliability
    IBM MQ is renowned for its high reliability, ensuring that your messages are delivered once and only once. This is critical for applications where message loss can result in significant operational issues.
  • Security
    It provides robust security features, including authentication, encryption, and authorization, which are essential for protecting sensitive data in transit.
  • Scalability
    IBM MQ can scale horizontally and vertically to meet the demands of growing applications and varying workloads, making it suitable for both small-scale and enterprise-level deployments.
  • Integrations
    It supports a wide range of platforms and programming languages, which makes it easier to integrate with existing systems and applications.
  • Transaction Support
    It offers comprehensive support for transactions, ensuring that multiple related messages are processed in a single unit of work, which can be rolled back if needed.
  • High Availability
    Features like queue manager clustering and multi-instance queue managers provide high availability and disaster recovery capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of IBM MQ

  • Cost
    IBM MQ is a premium product, which means it comes with a significant cost, especially for large-scale enterprise deployments.
  • Complexity
    Setting up and maintaining IBM MQ can be complex, requiring specialized knowledge and skills, which can be a barrier for smaller teams or organizations.
  • Resource Intensive
    It can be resource-intensive, requiring substantial computational resources for its full operation, which may not be ideal for lightweight or resource-constrained environments.
  • Dependency
    Using IBM MQ can create a dependency on IBM’s ecosystem, which might limit flexibility and increase the cost and complexity of switching to a different messaging solution in the future.
  • Learning Curve
    There is a steep learning curve associated with IBM MQ, particularly for new users who are not familiar with message queuing or IBM's specific implementation.
  • Licensing
    The licensing model can be complex and sometimes difficult to navigate, potentially leading to unexpected costs if not carefully managed.

Redux.js videos

No Redux.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

IBM MQ videos

IBM MQ Clustering - Tom Dunlap

More videos:

  • Review - IBM Db2 Analytics Accelerator for z/OS
  • Review - IBM Blockchain Platform - 2019 Review - All You Need to Know
  • Review - IBM Watson Virtual Agent _ (Part 01)
  • Review - IBM Blockchain Platform Community Call – Next Generation Platform Tour + Q&A
  • Review - IBM MQ V9 Open Source Monitoring
  • Review - IBM Db2 Analytics Accelerator – IDAA Afternoon Show 2019 08 28
  • Review - The next generation of the IBM Blockchain Platform

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Redux.js and IBM MQ)
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
Data Integration
0 0%
100% 100
JS Library
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Redux.js and IBM MQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Redux.js and IBM MQ

Redux.js Reviews

We have no reviews of Redux.js yet.
Be the first one to post

IBM MQ Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
IBM MQ is one of the best Kafka Alternatives which has an easy-to-use Interface and High Reliability and Data Security. It also facilitates the interoperability between various applications, either within or outside the organization. IBM MQ allows developers to focus on critical issues and manage any changes to transaction volumes asynchronously due to its simple structure.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
IBM MQ is an official message middleware which shortens the integration of varied applications and data spread throughout numerous platforms. It employs a message queue to share the info and offers a distinct messaging service for cloud systems, IoT gadgets, and mobile environments. By linking every element virtually from modest device to most complicated industrial...
Source: gokicker.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
IBM MQ is an easily usable interface with a great deal of reliability and security. Support is readily available in case needed anytime. It looks at handling the interoperability between various applications, be it within the organization or outside. It has asynchronous competencies and offers message integrity and relentless delivery. Because of its simplistic nature, it...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Redux.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 189 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Redux.js mentions (189)

  • Very Basic - Redux
    If you need more in depth information check out the documentation. https://redux.js.org/ It's actually pretty great. - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
  • Architecture and Design Patterns in Front-End
    In frontend, the most probably well-known approach is Flux and its most common implementation, Redux. This is an example of unidirectional data flow. - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago
  • Organisation of Data Flows
    The best known example of an architecture with unidirectional data flow is Flux and, as its implementation, Redux. - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago
  • Valentine’s Day Breakup: React Dumps Create React App
    CRA makes integrating libraries like Redux and React Router easy without requiring complex Webpack and Babel configurations. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • UmiJS: the Shaolin of web frameworks
    Dva. A plugin-based state management solution (Redux + Sagas). Also quite popular in narrow communities outside of the Umi world. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
View more

IBM MQ mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of IBM MQ yet. Tracking of IBM MQ recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Redux.js and IBM MQ, you can also consider the following products

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

react-context - Context provides a way to pass data through the component tree without having to pass props down manually at every level.

Ethereum - Ethereum is a decentralized platform for applications that run exactly as programmed without any chance of fraud, censorship or third-party interference.

Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps

Hyperledger - Hyperledger is a multi-project open source collaborative effort hosted by The Linux Foundation, created to advance cross-industry blockchain technologies.