redirect.pizza VS Kitty terminal

redirect.pizza Reviews

1. Chanaka De Silva

   | Software developer at preisboerse24 | over 2 years ago
   Super easy https redirection

   I was struggling with the HTTPS redirection with one of our old URLs and it was so hectic to manage. We didn't have any servers for this domain too. With redirect.pizza, it was so easy and I just needed to add few records to the domain and within 10 hours, it worked perfectly. I highly recommend redirect.pizza. And also their customer service is excellent too.

   👍 Pros:    Easy to setup|Simple interface|Simple but powerful

Kitty terminal Reviews

redirect.pizza mentions (9)

• A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev

  Redirect.pizza - Easily manage redirects with HTTPS support. The free plan includes 10 sources and 100,000 hits per month. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• HTTPS to HTTPS domain forwarding

  Https://redirect.pizza dumb name but does the trick for free. Source: 12 months ago

• [BEGINNER] How do I re-route users to another link while they visit my domain page?

  Use Redirect Pizza (probably the easiest option). Source: 12 months ago

• Wildcards are not allowed problem in Freenom

  Hello. I try to use redirect.pizza but it does not work because when I try to set the name it says Wildcards are not allowed. Can somebody help? Source: about 1 year ago

• Redirect Woes

  Looks like redirect.pizza supports https redirects and is affordable, I'll use this. Source: about 1 year ago

Kitty terminal mentions (88)

• Warp, the modern terminal, is now available for Linux

  A terminal with built-in telemetry and a pricing model... Just what I never wanted! To avoid being too negative, I'll offer the option of Kitty[1]. My current favorite terminal. Supports many features. Including my personal favorites: * ctrl+c (as opposed to stupid things like ctrl+shift+c) to copy data only when you have content selected. Otherwise, ctrl+c sends a sigint like normal. * font ligature support (a... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• I Just Wanted Emacs to Look Nice – Using 24-Bit Color in Terminals

  IME, this is like the golden age of terminal apps in general and macOS-compatible ones in particular. There are several really good terminals for macOS: [iTerm2 app](https://iterm2.com/) [Kitty terminal](https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/) [WezTerm terminal](https://wezfurlong.org/wezterm/index.html) [Alacritty](https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty) -... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• Waveterm

  I haven’t tried this yet (so please take my commentary with a grain of salt), but my initial thoughts are: (1) it looks interesting, (2) it looks overwhelming (there’s a lot going on in those screenshots), and (3) it’s likely slow (I might be completely wrong). To elaborate a bit… 1. I love good design work and well-designed (UI-wise) software, and it certainly looks like the creators of Wave Terminal have made... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• Contour: Modern and Fast Terminal Emulator

  There are lots of terminal projects recently. Ghostty (https://mitchellh.com/ghostty) and Terminal Click (https://terminal.click) come to mind. Also Warp and Fig but they don't appeal to me because they're proprietary (and Fig got acquired by Amazon). I've been very happy with kitty (https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/) for years and it would take a lot to make me switch. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Linux Terminal Emulators Have the Potential of Being Much Faster

  I favor kitty[0] and zutty[1]. Gnome terminal / libvte is and has always been slow, and alacritty might have good throughput, but sadly is high latency. 0. https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/ 1. https://tomscii.sig7.se/zutty/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago