No Gitless videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, React seems to be a lot more popular than Gitless. While we know about 814 links to React, we've tracked only 14 mentions of Gitless. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
One inspiring example is a developer building a "Todoist Clone" using a combination of React, Node.js, and MongoDB. The developer tapped into open source libraries and community support to create a highly responsive task management application. This project underscores how indie hackers can achieve rapid development and adaptation with minimal budget – a theme echoed in several indie hacking success stories. - Source: dev.to / 21 days ago
Next.js is a very popular framework built on top of the React.js library and it provides the best Development Experience for building applications. It offers a bunch of features like:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Explore the official React documentation. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
We’ll be creating the components package inside the packages directory. In this monorepo package, we’ll be building React components which will be consumed by our Next.js application (front-end package). - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
After evaluating our options including upgrading from AngularJS to Angular (the name for every version of Angular 2 and beyond) or migrating and rewriting our application in a completely new JavaScript framework: React. We ultimately chose to go with ReactJS. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
This is unrelated to the tool called "Gitless": https://gitless.com/. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
One such project is the Gitless initiative which has a Python wrapper around Git proper providing far-simpler workflows based on some solid research. Unfortunately it doesn't look like Gitless' Python codebase has had active development recently, which doesn't inspire much confidence. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
You and me both. Git's interface has been very hard for me to understand (especially coming from Mercurial). I ended up finding Gitless (https://gitless.com), a wrapper around Git with a better interface, and loving it. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
> > To differentiate from Git Pijul should focus on usability... If Pijul has an easy to use interface like Mercurial did then that will massively help adoption. > I don't think the goal or differentiation of pijul is to be popular via good UI, though. If the theory of patches is good, it doesn't matter if pijul "wins" or not, as long as whatever does can integrate it. If the theory of patches is bad, I... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I'd like to think it was my project (https://github.com/martinvonz/jj), but other possibilities include Gitless (https://gitless.com/) or Bazaar (https://bazaar.canonical.com/). - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces
Pijul - Pijul is a free and open source distributed version control system based on a sound theory of...
Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
Pro Git - The Git Book is the official tutorial about Git.
Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps
Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.