Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

React.run VS Arbiter IDE

Compare React.run VS Arbiter IDE and see what are their differences

React.run logo React.run

Quick in-browser prototyping for React Components!

Arbiter IDE logo Arbiter IDE

The offline-friendly, in-browser IDE for pure JS prototypes
  • React.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-11
  • Arbiter IDE Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-28

React.run features and specs

  • Simplified Setup
    React.run provides a streamlined and efficient setup for starting new React projects, minimizing the initial configuration time.
  • Pre-configured Environment
    It comes with a pre-configured environment that includes essential tools and libraries, reducing the need for additional setup and compatibility checks.
  • Boost developer productivity
    By automating much of the setup process, React.run allows developers to focus more on coding and less on configuring their development environment.
  • Consistency
    Ensures a standardized environment across different projects, which can be particularly beneficial for teams and large-scale applications.
  • Community Support
    Being an officially supported tool, it benefits from strong community support and timely updates from the React team.

Possible disadvantages of React.run

  • Limited Flexibility
    The pre-configured setup may not suit all project requirements, and making customizations can sometimes be challenging or require additional steps.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers new to React.run might face a learning curve as they adapt to the specific configurations and conventions used by the tool.
  • Dependency on Tool
    Relying heavily on React.run can create dependency, making it harder to switch to different tools or configurations if needed in the future.
  • Updates and Compatibility
    Although it receives updates, there's always a risk that a new version might introduce breaking changes or compatibility issues with existing projects.
  • Potential Overhead
    The inclusion of tools and libraries that may not be necessary for all projects can potentially add overhead and bloat to the development environment.

Arbiter IDE features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Arbiter IDE provides a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for both beginners and experienced developers to navigate and utilize its features effectively.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The IDE is designed to work seamlessly across different operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, ensuring that users have a consistent experience regardless of their platform.
  • Integrated Tools
    Arbiter comes with a comprehensive set of integrated tools for code editing, debugging, and testing, which helps streamline development workflows.
  • Customization
    Users can customize their development environment to fit their personal preferences or project requirements, enhancing their productivity and satisfaction.
  • Lightweight
    Unlike some of its competitors, Arbiter IDE is relatively lightweight, which results in faster start-up times and reduced memory consumption.

Possible disadvantages of Arbiter IDE

  • Limited Language Support
    Arbiter IDE might not support as many programming languages out of the box as some more established IDEs, which could limit its appeal for developers working with less mainstream languages.
  • Community and Support
    Being a newer or less widely-known IDE, it may not have as large a community or as much support documentation available, potentially making troubleshooting more difficult.
  • Feature Maturity
    Some advanced features might not be as mature or polished as those found in longer-established IDEs, which could affect reliability in complex projects.
  • Third-Party Integration
    There may be fewer plugins or third-party integrations available compared to more popular IDEs, which could limit its extensibility and ability to adapt to diverse project needs.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to React.run and Arbiter IDE)
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
80 80%
20% 20
Development Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Front-End Frameworks
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using React.run and Arbiter IDE. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, React.run seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 187 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

React.run mentions (187)

  • You should know this before choosing Next.js
    [2] https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • CVE-2025-29927 – Next.js
    > What do you get out of Next.js over vanilla React? The biggest problem is that React itself recommends against using Vanilla React. https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app > If you want to build a new app or website with React, we recommend starting with a framework. This, frankly, is insane. The whole point of React was that it was this relatively lightweight UI library you could drop into pretty much any... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • How much traffic can a pre-rendered Next.js site handle?
    I think people reasonably expect, say, an aws lambda to be aws specific. That's a very different story to React, which is supposed to be a library for general application ui development, and the official react documentation recommending Next as the way to use it. https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Sunsetting Create React App
    Interestingly, the Creating a React App page (https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app) does not mention Remix. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • React v19 has been released
    The Getting Started docs recommend against using vanilla React and nudge you towards NextJS and similar frameworks because you're gonna end up needing that stuff eventually https://react.dev/learn/start-a-new-react-project So new projects have to actively not follow the recommended approach in the docs if they want to use vanilla React. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

Arbiter IDE mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Arbiter IDE yet. Tracking of Arbiter IDE recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing React.run and Arbiter IDE, you can also consider the following products

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

Deco IDE - Best IDE for building React Native apps

Vite - Next Generation Frontend Tooling

CodeOnline - A remote and secure workspace powered by VSCode

Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps

WebComponents.dev - The modern IDE for web platform developers