Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

rdkafka VS Amazon SQS

Compare rdkafka VS Amazon SQS and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

rdkafka logo rdkafka

The Apache Kafka C/C++ library. Contribute to edenhill/librdkafka development by creating an account on GitHub.

Amazon SQS logo Amazon SQS

Amazon Simple Queue Service is a fully managed message queuing service.
  • rdkafka Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27
  • Amazon SQS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-22

rdkafka features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Amazon SQS features and specs

  • Scalability
    Amazon SQS scales automatically to handle an unlimited number of messages, ensuring that your application can support any level of demand without manual intervention.
  • Reliability
    Amazon SQS offers guaranteed delivery of messages, with multiple copies of each message stored redundantly across multiple servers and data centers.
  • Flexibility
    SQS supports both standard and FIFO (First In, First Out) queues, giving you the option to choose the type of queue that best suits your application's requirements.
  • Ease of Use
    Amazon SQS is fully managed, meaning you don't need to worry about provisioning or managing infrastructure. Integration is straightforward with a well-documented API.
  • Cost-Effective
    SQS follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you only pay for the number of calls made to the API and the amount of data transferred, making it a cost-effective solution for many use cases.
  • Security
    SQS integrates with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) to control access. Additionally, it supports encryption of messages in transit and at rest, enhancing security.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon SQS

  • Message Limitation
    Each SQS message can body can be up to 256 KB in size during one API call, which might be restrictive for certain applications that require larger message payloads.
  • Latency
    Though generally fast, there can be latency in message delivery, especially when compared to more direct communication methods like WebSocket or gRPC.
  • Complexity in Handling Large Number of Messages
    While SQS can handle a large number of messages, managing a very high throughput can become complex, requiring careful configuration of multiple queues, message batching, and appropriate back-off and retry logic.
  • Cost for High Volume
    While cost-effective for many scenarios, SQS costs can increase significantly with very high volumes of messages due to the per-request pricing, potentially necessitating budget management.
  • Limited Ordering Guarantees
    Standard queues do not ensure the order of message processing. While FIFO queues provide ordering, they come with limitations in terms of throughput and additional costs.
  • Visibility Timeout
    Incorrectly setting the visibility timeout can result in duplicated message processing or delayed message processing, requiring careful consideration and configuration based on the application's characteristics.

rdkafka videos

+ Add

Code Review: Implementing a c++ Kafka producer based on librdkafka (2 Solutions!!)

Amazon SQS videos

+ Add

Speed and Reliability at Any Scale: Amazon SQS and Database Services (SVC206) | AWS re:Invent 2013

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to rdkafka and Amazon SQS)

rdkafka

Amazon SQS

Stream Processing
9 9%
Stream Processing
91% 91
Data Integration
8 8%
Data Integration
92% 92
Automation
100 100%
Automation
0% 0
Web Service Automation
0 0%
Web Service Automation
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using rdkafka and Amazon SQS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare rdkafka and Amazon SQS

rdkafka Reviews

We have no reviews of rdkafka yet.
Be the first one to post

Amazon SQS Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
Amazon SQS offers standard features such as dead-letter queues and costs allocation tags. With Amazon SQS, you can access the web services API in any programming language that supports the AWS SDK.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
Amazon SQS (Simple Queue Service) is a fully managed, message queuing service for distributed systems, serverless applications, and microservices. It is known for the dissociation of components and the creation of effective asynchronous processes. It possesses a good SKD and a useful console. Because of its salient features, it is easy to use and hence favored by developers.
Source: www.spec-india.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon SQS seems to be a lot more popular than rdkafka. While we know about 72 links to Amazon SQS, we've tracked only 7 mentions of rdkafka. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

rdkafka mentions (7)

  • Horizontally scaling Kafka consumers with rendezvous hashing
    We could have made some changes at the librdkafka level (see this), but we didn’t really want to pursue this (at least not yet). - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Getting sum type values from a map
    As my first "real world" (ish) project in Vlang, I'm trying to copy https://github.com/confluentinc/confluent-kafka-go, which is a Go wrapper for Kafka C client library, https://github.com/edenhill/librdkafka. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Installing node-rdkafka on M1 for use with SASL
    If you're using Kafka in a Node.js app, it's likely that you'll need node-rdkafka. This is a library that wraps the librdkafka library and makes it available in Node.js. According to the project's README, "All the complexity of balancing writes across partitions and managing (possibly ever-changing) brokers should be encapsulated in the library.". - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Fix it, Fork it, Fuck off
    You are right, but in practice that's not what happens. Companies do not rely on open source libraries, the developers working for such companies do. I can give you a realistic example. If you want to use Kafka and Go, your probably only option is to use https://github.com/confluentinc/confluent-kafka-go. Its LICENSE explicitly says "no warranty". Now, what if I find a bug in the library? Only two realistic... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Hacker News top posts: Mar 26, 2022
    Librdkafka – An Apache Kafka C/C++ client library\ (9 comments). Source: about 3 years ago
View more

Amazon SQS mentions (72)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing rdkafka and Amazon SQS, you can also consider the following products

Kafka Manager - A tool for managing Apache Kafka.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

NSQ - A realtime distributed messaging platform.

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

KafkaHQ - Kafka GUI for Apache Kafka to manage topics, topics data, consumers group, schema registry, connect and more... - tchiotludo/kafkahq

Amazon SNS - Fully managed pub/sub messaging for microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications

Loading...