Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

raw.githack.com VS Hugo

Compare raw.githack.com VS Hugo and see what are their differences

Bunny.net
BunnyCDN is a simple and powerful CDN, offering lightning fast performance for a fraction of the cost with free SSL, Brotli, HTTP/2 and 100% Pay As You Go pricing. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

raw.githack.com logo raw.githack.com

raw.githack.com serves raw files from github.com with proper Content-Type headers (like rawgit.

Hugo logo Hugo

Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
  • raw.githack.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-27
  • Hugo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21

raw.githack.com features and specs

  • Easy URL Access
    RawGitHack provides a simple way to serve files directly from public GitHub repositories, making it easy to share static files without additional setup.
  • CDN Support
    The service leverages Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) to ensure fast and reliable access to files, potentially enhancing load times and availability.
  • No Setup Required
    Users can quickly use RawGitHack without needing to configure their own server or hosting, which is convenient for developers needing swift access.
  • Automatic Updates
    Files served through RawGitHack are automatically updated from the GitHub repository, ensuring the latest version is always accessible.

Possible disadvantages of raw.githack.com

  • Limitation on Private Repos
    RawGitHack can only serve files from public repositories, which may be a limitation for projects requiring privacy or restricted access.
  • Potential Reliability Issues
    As a free service, there could be concerns about the long-term availability and reliability, particularly if service demand surpasses capacity.
  • Security Risks
    Exposing raw files directly via a URL may pose security risks, especially if sensitive data or credentials are accidentally included in shared files.
  • Dependency on Third-party
    Relying on a third-party service for file serving introduces dependency, which could be problematic if the service changes its terms or goes down.

Hugo features and specs

  • Performance
    Hugo is extremely fast, capable of generating websites with thousands of pages in milliseconds, making it one of the fastest static site generators available.
  • Flexible Content Management
    Hugo supports multiple content types, taxonomies, menus, and dynamic API-driven content, offering a high level of flexibility for different site architectures.
  • Ease of Use
    Hugo’s straightforward installation process and simple configuration files make it accessible, even for beginners.
  • Extended Markdown
    It extends standard Markdown with additional shortcodes, which allows embedding rich content like videos, tweets, and more with simple syntax.
  • Large Community and Plugins
    Hugo has a large and active community that develops themes and plugins, providing ample resources and support for developers.
  • Inbuilt Server
    Hugo comes with a built-in server for local development, enabling real-time previews and speeding up the development process.

Possible disadvantages of Hugo

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its simplicity, Hugo’s template language and content rendering system can be complex for beginners to grasp initially.
  • Limited Dynamic Features
    As a static site generator, Hugo is not ideal for websites that require real-time data processing or dynamic content generation without additional tooling and integration.
  • Go-based Templating
    Hugo uses Go-based templating, which might be unfamiliar to developers accustomed to other templating engines such as Liquid, Handlebars, or Mustache.
  • Lack of Built-in CMS
    Unlike some other static site generators, Hugo does not come with its own CMS interface, which can be a downside for users who prefer a graphical content management system.
  • Dependency on Command Line
    Using Hugo effectively requires comfort with command-line interfaces, which can be a barrier to less technical users.

Analysis of Hugo

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Hugo is considered a good choice for static site generation, particularly for users who value performance and simplicity.

Why this product is good

  • Hugo is a popular static site generator known for its speed, flexibility, and ease of use. It allows developers and content creators to build fast, scalable, and secure websites without relying on a database. Hugo's templating and theming options are powerful, supporting a wide range of use cases from blogs to fully-featured websites. Additionally, it has an active community and extensive documentation, which makes getting started and troubleshooting easier.

Recommended for

  • Developers who need a fast and efficient static site generator.
  • Content creators who prefer markdown-based writing and easy content management.
  • Users who want a highly customizable and extensible platform.
  • Teams that require a tool with robust multilingual support.
  • Individuals or organizations looking to build websites with minimal server-side dependencies.

raw.githack.com videos

No raw.githack.com videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Hugo videos

+ Add

Hugo - Movie Review by Chris Stuckmann

More videos:

  • Review - Hugo - A Love Letter to Cinema
  • Review - Hugo Review (funny movie review)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to raw.githack.com and Hugo)

raw.githack.com

Hugo

CDN
100 100%
CDN
0% 0
Blogging
0 0%
Blogging
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
Static Site Generators
0 0%
Static Site Generators
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using raw.githack.com and Hugo. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare raw.githack.com and Hugo

raw.githack.com Reviews

We have no reviews of raw.githack.com yet.
Be the first one to post

Hugo Reviews

Top 10 Next.js Alternatives You Can Try
If you are looking for a powerful static website generator, Hugo is a good alternative to Next.js. You can build multilingual websites much faster and in a simple way that no other platform will offer you. Furthermore, this platform will increase your experience in creating websites with beautiful Markdown syntax and pre-built features like commenting.
Source: www.zegocloud.com
20 Next.js Alternatives Worth Considering
Certainly. Jekyll and Hugo are popular static site generators that don’t rely on React.js. Jekyll uses Ruby, while Hugo is renowned for its speed and simplicity. These options are excellent for projects focusing on content-driven sites without heavy JavaScript frameworks.
Source: tms-outsource.com
10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Source: www.netlify.com
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Hugo does something similar with its menu templates. You can define menu links in your Hugo site config, and even add useful properties that Hugo understands, like weighting. Here’s a definition of the menu above in config.yaml:
Source: www.freecodecamp.org
Top Static Site Generators For 2019
Hugo is a static site generator which is also very popular which is proven by over 30,000 stars on GitHub right now. Hugo is based on the Go programming language which is great if you have already gained some knowledge of Go. Hugo claims that it is the fastest framework for building websites. In fact Hugo comes with an ultra-fast build process and makes building static...
Source: medium.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hugo seems to be a lot more popular than raw.githack.com. While we know about 388 links to Hugo, we've tracked only 9 mentions of raw.githack.com. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

raw.githack.com mentions (9)

  • A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev
    Raw.githack.com — A modern replacement of rawgit.com which simply hosts file using Cloudflare. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • JSONPath with Alpine.js CSP build in Postman Visualizer
    Of course, it's nicer to just link files from a CDN, so I created a gist and use https://raw.githack.com/ to serve the file from there. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • I'm working on an incremental game, first time I've ever done this, so please leave feedback. I am actively releasing updates.
    It uses raw.githack.com to convert Github HTML code to web format. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Serving an .html file to the internet out from a codeberg repository?
    There's a website called Codeberg that is open source and based in Germany, the site pretty much work as an open source alternative to Github and Gitlab by cooperating the same way as they do with the "Git" program. I've came across some websites like https://gitcdn.link/ and https://raw.githack.com/, but they only work with specific websites and not for Codeberg. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Tag "latest" for the AppImage releases
    Combined with https://raw.githack.com/, this might even make zsync use possible as well! Source: almost 4 years ago
View more

Hugo mentions (388)

  • Hacking with mdBook
    A few days back, I wrote a blog post about static site generators, in particular how I decided to migrate my blog from Zola to Hugo. One of my points was to be able to hack my own content before generating the final HTML. - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago
  • Why I am Migrating From Zola Back to Hugo
    This post is a summary of my recent decision to go back to Hugo after using Zola. I also report on how LLM assistants with Web access can aid in such decisions, not as an authority but as a research assistant. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • How to Migrate Technical Documentation: Tools, Checklist, and Tips
    Hugo is a fast and flexible static site generator built in Go, known for its speed and large theme ecosystem. It supports markdown, taxonomies, multilingual content, and powerful templating with minimal dependencies. Hugo is highly performant and well-suited for building large-scale documentation sites. It’s ideal for teams seeking speed and customization with minimal runtime requirements. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Ask HN: Static Site (not blog) Generator?
    Try Hugo[1]. In depends on a template you choose alone whether Hugo will generate a landing page, a website, a blog, etc. [1] https://gohugo.io. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • 🥳 We built the cli of our dreams to send sms ❣️
    The content of the guide lives in a single Markdown file, content/_index.md. The website is built using Hugo. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing raw.githack.com and Hugo, you can also consider the following products

jsDelivr - A free, fast, and reliable Open Source CDN for npm and GitHub with the largest network and best performance from all OSS CDNs. Serving 100 billion requests per month.

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

RawGit - RawGit serves raw files directly from GitHub with proper content-type headers.

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

Statically - The free optimization & CDN for images, CSS, JavaScript, and open source.

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.

Loading...