Software Alternatives & Reviews

Raskin VS Wayland

Compare Raskin VS Wayland and see what are their differences

Raskin logo Raskin

Experience Raskin's unique bird's eye view to browse and manage your pictures, presentations, PDFs… Raskin For Mac is free to try – or just $9. 99 to buy. Download now What's .

Wayland logo Wayland

Wayland is intended as a simpler replacement for X, easier to develop and maintain.
  • Raskin Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03
  • Wayland Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-30

Raskin videos

Raskin: ‘Remarkable’ That Ginni Thomas Still Believes Election Was Stolen

More videos:

  • Review - Rep. Raskin On What He’s Learned From Reading Trump Aide Peter Navarro’s Book
  • Review - U.S. Congressman Jamie Raskin, Author of "Unthinkable"

Wayland videos

WAYLAND: what is it, and is it ready for daily use?

More videos:

  • Review - Testing Wayland & Weston desktop experience in 2020!
  • Review - Wayland vs Xorg | Learn which one to choose

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Raskin and Wayland)
Note Taking
100 100%
0% 0
Window Manager
17 17%
83% 83
Linux
0 0%
100% 100
Mac
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Raskin and Wayland. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Wayland seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 23 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Raskin mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Raskin yet. Tracking of Raskin recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Wayland mentions (23)

  • Session manager Anbox
    Waydroid is rebuilding the original idea behind Anbox with explicit focus on modern Wayland powered desktop environments. Source: 11 months ago
  • Asahi Linux To Users: Please Stop Using X.Org
    Checkout out the wayland site.( https://wayland.freedesktop.org/ ) The gist is wayland is a protocol that describes how compositor implementations need to behave for clients to use them and clients need to behave according to the waylaid protocol to use the compositor. There are many different compositors. The wayland contributors have a full usable implementation. Gnome has one and I believe KDE has one. So if... Source: 12 months ago
  • Swingland: Recreating Java Swing for Wayland
    More recently I switched away from X11 & Budgie to pure Wayland for my desktop on the assumption that it's over 10 years old now, and is the default technology underlying current Gnome and KDE desktops.. Everything will be fine right? Kind of.. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Linux is Making Apple Great Again
    Wayland is not a WM. https://wayland.freedesktop.org Wayland is the thing "underneath" a Window Manager. For example you can run KDE on top of X or Wayland. There are a few blurry boundaries in all this but that largely covers it. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • How do I get emacs29 to work on X11 system?
    I told you it is for Wayland. If you don't want to use X11. Source: about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Raskin and Wayland, you can also consider the following products

Compiz - Project information. Maintainer: PS Project Management Team. Driver: Compiz Maintainers. Licence: GNU GPL v2, GNU LGPL v2. 1, MIT / X / Expat Licence.

Mir - The purpose of Mir is to enable the development of user interfaces shells.

Dexpot - If you don't have Dexpot yet, the new update makes it a must-have tool for Windows, adding a ton of features to your desktop that you never knew you wanted.

i3 - A dynamic tiling window manager designed for X11, inspired by wmii, and written in C.

Witch - Welcome to the world of W. i. t. c. h.

dwm - dwm is a dynamic window manager for X. It manages windows in tiled, monocle and floating layouts. All of the layouts can be applied dynamically, optimising the environment for the application in use and the task performed.