Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Randomize.net VS OnCore

Compare Randomize.net VS OnCore and see what are their differences

Randomize.net logo Randomize.net

Randomize.net is an IWRS that efficiently manages subject randomization and drug supply for your clinical trials.

OnCore logo OnCore

OnCore Enterprise Research system supports efficient processes at academic medical centers, cancer centers, and health care systems.
  • Randomize.net Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-07-31
  • OnCore Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-26

Randomize.net features and specs

  • Centralized Randomization
    Randomize.net provides a centralized platform for managing and implementing randomization schemes, which can improve consistency and reduce errors in clinical trials.
  • Real-time Access
    Researchers and clinicians have real-time access to randomization results and other relevant data, improving efficiency and decision-making during trials.
  • Regulatory Compliance
    The platform is designed to comply with regulatory requirements, which is essential for clinical trials that will be submitted to regulatory bodies like the FDA or EMA.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Randomize.net can integrate with other clinical trial management systems, enhancing data flow and reducing the need for manual data entry.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform offers an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easier for trial coordinators and site personnel to use effectively.

Possible disadvantages of Randomize.net

  • Cost
    Depending on the size and scope of the trial, using Randomize.net can be expensive, which might be a barrier for smaller organizations or studies with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, new users may still face a learning curve when initially setting up and navigating the system.
  • Internet Dependence
    As a web-based platform, Randomize.net requires a reliable internet connection, which might be challenging in remote or under-resourced settings.
  • Customization Limitations
    Although the platform supports various randomization methods, there may be limitations when highly customized randomization schemes are needed.
  • Data Migration
    Transitioning to Randomize.net from another system can be time-consuming and complex, requiring careful planning and data migration efforts.

OnCore features and specs

  • Comprehensive Functionality
    OnCore offers a wide range of features, including protocol management, subject tracking, financial management, and reporting, designed to streamline the clinical trial process.
  • Integration Capability
    The system can integrate with other platforms and electronic health records (EHRs), facilitating seamless data flow across different systems involved in clinical trials.
  • Regulatory Compliance
    OnCore ensures compliance with regulatory requirements, helping institutions maintain adherence to industry standards and avoid potential legal and financial penalties.
  • Customizable Workflows
    Users can customize the workflows to better match their specific clinical trial processes, making the system flexible to different institutional needs.
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    OnCore promotes better collaboration among different stakeholders, including researchers, administrators, and finance departments, by providing a centralized platform for data and communication.

Possible disadvantages of OnCore

  • High Implementation Costs
    The initial setup and ongoing maintenance costs can be high, potentially making it less accessible for smaller research sites or institutions with limited budgets.
  • Complexity
    Due to its comprehensive nature, the system can be complex and may require extensive training for users to become proficient, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While customization is a feature, it can be challenging and may require additional time and technical expertise to tailor the system to specific institutional needs.
  • Dependency on Technical Support
    Users may frequently need to rely on technical support for troubleshooting and system management, which could add to the operational costs and time delays.
  • Data Migration Issues
    Migrating legacy data into OnCore can be difficult, involving complex procedures to ensure data accuracy and completeness during the transition.

Analysis of Randomize.net

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Randomize.net is a good platform for clinical trial randomization due to its strong security, compliance with regulations, and ease of use.

Why this product is good

  • Randomize.net is considered a reliable tool for randomization in clinical trials. It offers a user-friendly interface, robust security features, and compliance with regulatory requirements, making it a preferred choice for researchers. The service provides comprehensive support, detailed audit trails, and flexibility in trial design, ensuring efficient and accurate data management.

Recommended for

    Researchers and organizations conducting clinical trials who need a reliable and secure randomization service that accommodates various trial designs and ensures data integrity.

Randomize.net videos

No Randomize.net videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

OnCore videos

OnCore ELIXR - Guerrilla Golf Ball Testing vs Pro-V1

More videos:

  • Review - Best Golf Ball - OnCore Review - Wendell CC - Golf Test Dummy
  • Review - ONCORE ELIXR: Golf Ball Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Randomize.net and OnCore)
Clinical Trial Management System
Text Messaging
26 26%
74% 74
CTMS
48 48%
52% 52
SMS Surveys
12 12%
88% 88

User comments

Share your experience with using Randomize.net and OnCore. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Randomize.net and OnCore, you can also consider the following products

eAdjudication - eAdjudication is a cloud software solution designed to manage endpoint adjudication in an effective and quality controlled environment.

OpenClinica - OpenClinica is an open source clinical trials software.

SMART-TRIAL - SMART-TRIAL is designed for medical device manufacturers who need to generate, store, and share clinical evidence. 

Castor EDC - Castor offers you a user-friendly and fully featured application for electronic data collection.

Medidata CTMS - Medidata CTMS seamlessly integrates with Medidata Rave to provide real-time views into study progress without manual tracking.

Mosio - Mosio helps researchers engage, retain, and collect data from study subjects more efficiently and effectively with text messaging.