Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OpenClinica VS Randomize.net

Compare OpenClinica VS Randomize.net and see what are their differences

OpenClinica logo OpenClinica

OpenClinica is an open source clinical trials software.

Randomize.net logo Randomize.net

Randomize.net is an IWRS that efficiently manages subject randomization and drug supply for your clinical trials.
  • OpenClinica Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-27
  • Randomize.net Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-07-31

OpenClinica features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    OpenClinica offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it user-friendly for clinical researchers and other end-users.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, it allows for extensive customization and flexibility. Organizations can modify the software to suit specific needs and requirements.
  • Comprehensive Feature Set
    The platform includes a wide range of features, such as electronic data capture (EDC), electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO), randomization, and more.
  • Regulatory Compliance
    OpenClinica is designed to be compliant with key regulatory standards like FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and ICH-GCP, making it suitable for regulated clinical trials.
  • Community Support
    There is a vibrant community of users and developers who contribute to the platform, offering shared resources and peer support.

Possible disadvantages of OpenClinica

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the platform can still have a steep learning curve for new users, especially those not familiar with EDC systems.
  • Cost of Implementation
    Although the software itself is open-source, the cost of implementation, customization, and ongoing support can add up, particularly for smaller organizations.
  • Technical Expertise Required
    Customization and effective use of the software often require a higher level of technical expertise, which may not be readily available in all organizations.
  • Limited Third-party Integrations
    Compared to some proprietary solutions, OpenClinica may have limited out-of-the-box integrations with third-party tools, necessitating additional development work.
  • Performance Issues
    In some cases, users have reported performance issues, particularly when handling large datasets or running complex queries.

Randomize.net features and specs

  • Centralized Randomization
    Randomize.net provides a centralized platform for managing and implementing randomization schemes, which can improve consistency and reduce errors in clinical trials.
  • Real-time Access
    Researchers and clinicians have real-time access to randomization results and other relevant data, improving efficiency and decision-making during trials.
  • Regulatory Compliance
    The platform is designed to comply with regulatory requirements, which is essential for clinical trials that will be submitted to regulatory bodies like the FDA or EMA.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Randomize.net can integrate with other clinical trial management systems, enhancing data flow and reducing the need for manual data entry.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform offers an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easier for trial coordinators and site personnel to use effectively.

Possible disadvantages of Randomize.net

  • Cost
    Depending on the size and scope of the trial, using Randomize.net can be expensive, which might be a barrier for smaller organizations or studies with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, new users may still face a learning curve when initially setting up and navigating the system.
  • Internet Dependence
    As a web-based platform, Randomize.net requires a reliable internet connection, which might be challenging in remote or under-resourced settings.
  • Customization Limitations
    Although the platform supports various randomization methods, there may be limitations when highly customized randomization schemes are needed.
  • Data Migration
    Transitioning to Randomize.net from another system can be time-consuming and complex, requiring careful planning and data migration efforts.

OpenClinica videos

OpenClinica Demo

More videos:

  • Review - OpenClinica Hands-on: Printing Blank CRFs

Randomize.net videos

No Randomize.net videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OpenClinica and Randomize.net)
Clinical Trial Management System
Text Messaging
78 78%
22% 22
SMS Surveys
90 90%
10% 10
CTMS
64 64%
36% 36

User comments

Share your experience with using OpenClinica and Randomize.net. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OpenClinica and Randomize.net, you can also consider the following products

Castor EDC - Castor offers you a user-friendly and fully featured application for electronic data collection.

eAdjudication - eAdjudication is a cloud software solution designed to manage endpoint adjudication in an effective and quality controlled environment.

OnCore - OnCore Enterprise Research system supports efficient processes at academic medical centers, cancer centers, and health care systems.

SMART-TRIAL - SMART-TRIAL is designed for medical device manufacturers who need to generate, store, and share clinical evidence. 

Medidata CTMS - Medidata CTMS seamlessly integrates with Medidata Rave to provide real-time views into study progress without manual tracking.

Mosio - Mosio helps researchers engage, retain, and collect data from study subjects more efficiently and effectively with text messaging.