Rake VS Parcel
Compare Rake VS Parcel and see what are their differences
The PAQATO After-Sales Experience Platform is the growth driver that makes online stores successful for tomorrow.
featured
Rake
CMake
GNU Make
SCons
Gradle
Meson
Evernote
Ninja Build
Parcel
Webpack
17track
rollup.js
AfterShip
Vite
esbuild
Grunt
Rake ParcelBased on our record, Parcel seems to be a lot more popular than Rake. While we know about 102 links to Parcel, we've tracked only 1 mention of Rake. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I've used Rake and Fabric for somewhat similar (but less ambitious) stuff in the past and I'm thinking that Fabric might be a pretty good fit for this task as well, but I'd still like your input. Are there other tools I should look into? I've heard goodthings about Puppet but just looking at their site (it contains the word Enterprise ) gives me the feeling that it might be overkill for a one man operation. Source: about 2 years ago
At first we wanted to just get rid of all the helper utilities. Keep only the kernel, but this would mean a loss of backward compatibility. We needed some efficient code processing instead with recomposition and tree-shaking. We needed a bundler. But which one? Our testing approach relies on targets, not sources. We rebuilt the project frequently, speed was critical requirement. In essence, we chose a solution... - Source: dev.to / about 19 hours ago
It runs using Parcel, very simple and easy to setup. The app has 3 files:. - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
In the Changelog Podcast episode referenced above, Dan Abramov alluded to Parcel working on RSC support as well. I couldn’t find much to back up that claim aside from a GitHub issue discussing directives and a social media post by Devon Govett (creator of Parcel), so I can’t say for sure if Parcel is currently a viable option for developing with RSCs. - Source: dev.to / 20 days ago
Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them.... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
I’ve tried something similar on the frontend side: I decided to build a UI for Ollama.ai using only HTML, CSS, and JS (Single-Page Application). The goal is to learn something new and have zero runtime dependencies on other projects and NPM modules. Only Node and Parcel.js (https://parceljs.org/) are needed during development for serving files, bundling, etc. The only runtime dependency is a modern browser. Here's... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.
Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.
GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.
17track - All-in-one package tracking
SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.
rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.