Software Alternatives & Reviews

Rake VS Ninja Build

Compare Rake VS Ninja Build and see what are their differences


Rake is a software task management and build automation tool.

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.
Not present
Ninja Build Landing Page
Ninja Build Landing Page

Rake details

Categories
Continuous Integration Todos Product Deployment
Website rake.rubyforge.org  

Ninja Build details

Categories
Continuous Integration Product Deployment Java Build Tools
Website ninja-build.org  

Rake videos

Rake PC Game Review

More videos:

  • - What Is The Best Yard Rake For Your Clean Up Needs? | Weekend Handy Woman
  • - Rake Review - Worth a Buy?

Ninja Build videos

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Rake and Ninja Build)
28
28%
72%
72
29
29%
71%
71
26
26%
74%
74
100
100%
0%
0

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ninja Build seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on Reddit, HackerNews and some other platforms. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Rake mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Rake yet. Tracking of Rake recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Ninja Build mentions (5)

  • Cmake alterntives
    The build can be faster if you use Ninja instead of make. Ninja was designed for speed and to have its input files be generated by programs instead of hand-written. If a project is already just using make, simply changing the generator to Ninja cmake -G Ninja will probably result in faster builds. - Source: Reddit / 24 days ago
  • Is there a statically typed functional programming language that doesn't take purity so seriously?
    * BuckleScript/ReScript works by forking the OCaml compiler and has been stuck on years-out-of-date versions of it as a result. Works well but you miss out on some nice stuff that's been done the past few years. Melange is trying to fix some of that by splitting out the compiler changes in a way that lets it keep up with recent compiler versions, plus eventually replace its odd custom Ninja-based build system... - Source: Reddit / 4 months ago
  • How do you build your source code?
    We use ninja - a very small and fast build system. Ninja generally needs something to generate its build files (CMake, Meson, etc.), but we just use a little Python script to generate ours. - Source: Reddit / 5 months ago
  • Looking Beyond Nox
    So far, I've looked, relatively superficially, at Ninja, doit, Bazel, and SCons. It looks to me like Ninja and doit won't handle the third point above without requiring something really strange, and if Bazel or SCons documents things one way or the other, I haven't found it yet. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Debian Running on Rust Coreutils
    There's always ninja. https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Rake and Ninja Build, you can also consider the following products

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Gradle - Accelerate developer productivity. Gradle helps teams build, automate and deliver better software, faster. DocsExplore the documentation of Gradle. Find installation ..

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

Evernote - Bring your life's work together in one digital workspace. Evernote is the place to collect inspirational ideas, write meaningful words, and move your important projects forward.

User reviews

Share your experience with using Rake and Ninja Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Post a review