Software Alternatives & Reviews

Rack VS Roda Framework

Compare Rack VS Roda Framework and see what are their differences

Rack logo Rack

Backend Development

Roda Framework logo Roda Framework

Roda is a lightweight and productive framework for building web applications in Ruby.
  • Rack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-01-04
  • Roda Framework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-11-26

Rack videos

I BOUGHT the CHEAPEST Power Rack on Amazon...

More videos:

  • Review - Rep PR-5000 V2 Power Rack Review: Better than Rogue Monster Rack?
  • Review - REP PR-5000 Squat Rack Review: The TRUTH After A Year

Roda Framework videos

No Roda Framework videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Rack and Roda Framework)
Web Frameworks
32 32%
68% 68
Developer Tools
29 29%
71% 71
Ruby Web Framework
31 31%
69% 69
Python Web Framework
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Rack and Roda Framework. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Roda Framework should be more popular than Rack. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Rack mentions (1)

  • The Ruby Unbundled Series: Writing an Instant Poll Rails App in a Single File
    So what is Rack? Rack sits between your Rails application and your web server, puma in my case. It provides an abstraction that allows you to swap out the web server if you like. It performs quite a bit of request handling logic. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

Roda Framework mentions (3)

  • It's not Ruby that's slow, it's your database
    Personal opinion, if I was going to use htmx with a PORO backend I'd probably go for Roda[1] and Sequel. If it was going to be read heavy I think I'd also pair that with SQLite for low latency and cheaper deployments. If I didn't know exactly how requirements are likely to change over time I'd probably go with with Rails, Postgres[2], Redis and Hotwire. You can go a long way with that and a small team. 1. ... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • To Ruby from Python
    This is personal opinion but these days I'd probably swap Sinatra for Roda[1] for small API services. It's generally faster, uses less memory and is a really good example of well written ruby code, IMHO. I also really like Jeremy Evans' book, Polished Ruby. 1. http://roda.jeremyevans.net/index.html. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Don't make me think, or why I switched to Rails from JavaScript SPAs
    It’s not really true that there are no other options for web development in ruby. Roda[1], for instance, has a strong following for API work. It’s just that Rails is a safe choice. 1. http://roda.jeremyevans.net/index.html. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Rack and Roda Framework, you can also consider the following products

Sinatra - Classy web-development dressed in a DSL

Cuba - Cuba is a Ruby microframework for web development.

Hanami - Hanami is a modern web framework for Ruby.

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

Camping - A Ruby Microframework

Flask - a microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions.