Quarto VS Typst

> Interactive examples have been added to the documentation, allowing users to run the examples locally on embedded Jupyterlite notebooks in their browser. This might sound strange, but to me this is the most exciting thing listed in the update document. I've been looking for ways to include _interactive_ Python scripts on static webpages (such as those made using Jupyter Book [1] or Quarto [1]. Up to now the only... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

Deckset was the OG in this space, which I used a decade (!) ago in college. Looks like they moved off the Mac App Store, and are bringing out an iOS app now: https://www.deckset.com Now I much prefer something like https://quarto.org with dataviz. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

To mirror another comment: I really like the concept and will give it a try. As an alternative, I want to suggest [Quarto](https://quarto.org) - somewhat similar, easy to use, one might even call it "basic" (I mean that in a good way!) 7/5 ^^. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

The magic of well-defined APIs! If you're interested in mixing different DS backends and kernels in a single notebook, check out Quarto: [1]: https://quarto.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Quarto - https://quarto.org I've been searching for some time also, more or less the same requirements, and I settled on quarto. Give it a try, you won't be disappointed! - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

I have been using Typst[1] for taking notes on machine learning. It's fast (updates are instantaneous). The syntax is almost like Markdown. I tried to learn LaTeX but Typst seems to have an easier learning curve. [1]: https://typst.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

I'd personally consider using Typst (https://typst.app) instead of LaTeX. It has a much more readable syntax and you don't need as much snippets to write it. You can use in on their website or run the compiler locally just like LaTeX. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

For writing math notes (especially in vim), I switch to using Typst (https://typst.app). Here's a few points: - The syntax is a lot lighter and easier to type fast. I was up and running in half hour after starting to use it. Once in a while I can look up some symbol name in the docs but that's about it. - Empty document is a valid document. No preambles, no includes etc, it's all optional and the defaults are... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Have you seen typst? I have moved over from LaTex to Typst and most if not all your use cases are covered. https://typst.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

How does this compare to Typst?[1] What I like about Typst is that I can use it completely offline and with my editor of choice. Is this planned for htmldocs too? [1] https://typst.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago