Qoppa PDF Studio VS Nikola

Qoppa PDF Studio Reviews

1. Michael Norbit    

   Own Boss at Idependent | 9 months ago
   Perfect to edit and sign PDF easily

   I was surprised to find a simple interface with all the features that I need to work with PDFs, I can edit and modify PDFs fast, with no problems at all

   🏁 Competitors: Adobe Acrobat DC, Nitro Pro

   👍 Pros:    Good price|Simple yet powerful and efficient tool|Digital signatures|Edit pdf|Easy merge of projects

   👎 Cons:    Limited trial version
2. Justin Toh    

   almost 2 years ago
   Excellent

   I have had an excellent experience with PDF Studio. There are a wide variety of features and the interface is intuitive and easy. Hands-down the best PDF editor I have used.

   👍 Pros:    Ease of use|Wast variety of features|Reasonable prices
3. ashishyt    

   almost 2 years ago
   Awesome PDF Editor

   PDF studio Pro is a fantastic product to create and edit your pdfs. It helped me transition from Windows to Linux as far as pdf editing is concerned. It has great features to enable the editing and annotating the pdfs. And unlike other paid and free software, it lets you import and export your settings to quickly restore your favorite layout of the product. To me this was one of the distinguishing features.

   🏁 Competitors: Master PDF Editor

Nikola Reviews

Qoppa PDF Studio mentions (0)

Nikola mentions (8)

• 5 Best Static Site Generators in Python

  Nikola is a feature-rich static site generator that supports a variety of formats for content creation, including reStructuredText, Markdown, and Jupyter Notebooks. It offers a flexible architecture, allowing you to use different template engines and supports plugins for extending functionality. Nikola is suitable for both simple blogs and complex websites. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• Trying to work around a Jekyll site-building tutorial without using Jekyll

  You can - you'd basically just create a python script that parses your HTML/CSS files and replaces strings with values from your YAML. However I wouldn't recommend that unless you're just using this as an opportunity to learn Python. If you want to standup a real site and you want to use python, I'd recommend a Python static site generator like Pelican or Nikola. Source: over 1 year ago

• I'm building a personal website. Should I bother doing it in Python or just use a template?

  I tend to prefer static site generators for this kind of use case. I use Nikola, which is written in and based on Python. You should be able to pick whatever html5up template you like and turn it into a Nikola template, too. Source: almost 2 years ago

• Generate Static Sites from Markdown Files with Caddy

  Or writing your own Caddy-module that does exactly that? [0] https://getnikola.com. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• Ask HN: How to build a light weight personal blog?

  I switched to Nikola recently: https://getnikola.com/ Reads every kind of plaintext format, but will also just publish a Jupyter notebook which means you can do drag and drop image and graph inlining which makes everything so much simpler (and thus makes me more likely to keep it up). - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago