Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

QF-Test VS Webpack

Compare QF-Test VS Webpack and see what are their differences

QF-Test logo QF-Test

The Tool for professional UI Test Automation - Automate your Web, Java, Windows and Android tests with QF-Test, the professional & reliable testing tool!

Webpack logo Webpack

Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.
  • QF-Test Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-17

QF-Test is the established tool for professional GUI test automation of desktop, web, mobile applications as well as PDF documents. On the market since 2001, the test tool is continuously being actively developed and is currently used by more than 1,500 companies across 60 countries.

QF-Test is a low-code GUI test tool that allows you to efficiently create test cases, e.g. using Capture/Replay, without any programming knowledge across platforms on Windows, Linux and macOS. For software developers, Jython, Groovy or JavaScript offer advanced scripting possibilities.

Tests can be run automatically via continuous integration tools such as Jenkins and generate detailed log files and XML or HTML reports.

Use QF-Test to create robust and stable regression tests for various GUI technologies.

QF-Test supports all types of Java GUIs, ranging from Swing (including ULC, JIDE components, CaptainCasa), its successor JavaFX, as well as the Standard Widget Toolkit (SWT) and Eclipse, including plugins and RCP applications.

You can also use QF-Test to test dynamic web applications based on Angular, React or Vue.js, for example, including Electron and hybrid applications using JxBrowser, JPro or WebSwing, for example.

Learn more at www.qfs.de. Contact us at service@qfs.de and we will help you find the right place for QF-Test in your organization!

  • Webpack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-13

QF-Test

Website
qfs.de
$ Details
paid Free Trial €2375.0 / One-off (One-time License purchase | Annual Maintenance + Support fee)
Platforms
Windows Linux Mac OSX Java Jython Groovy JavaScript Cross Platform Browser Google Chrome Safari Internet Explorer Firefox Edge Opera .Net C++ C
Release Date
2001 December

Webpack

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

QF-Test features and specs

  • Continuous Integration: e.g. Jenkins, GitLab/CD, Bamboo, Travis CI, Circle CI, TeamCity, Ant, Maven, CruiseControl
  • Testing management: e.g. ALM/QualityCenter by MicroFocus/HP, TestBench by Imbus, QMetry, Klaros by Verit, TestLink, IBM Rational Quality Manager
  • Keyword driven Testing: Yes
  • Data driven Testing: e.g. with Excel, CSV and all kind of data bases
  • Error tracking: e.g. Jira, Mantis, Bugzilla
  • Scripting Language: Jython, Groovy, JavaScript
  • Browser: Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Safari, Microsoft Edge, Internet Explorer
  • Jira Integration: e.g. JIRA and JIRA PlugIns like TestRail, Zephyr, X-Ray, TM4J
  • Java in the browser: Webswing, JPro
  • Daemon mode: Yes
  • Object Recognition: Yes, stable and robust
  • Virtual Desktop Streaming: e.g. Citrix, VMware, VirtualBox
  • Docker: Yes
  • Version Control: e.g. Git, SVN/Subversion, CVS, Mercurial

Webpack features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

QF-Test videos

Overview

More videos:

  • Demo - Quick Run-Through - Test Automation Features
  • Demo - Version 5.3 - CDP-Driver and New Icons
  • Demo - Technical insights
  • Review - Selenium vs. QF-Test | GUI Test Tool for Java, Web and Windows
  • Review - Testing PDF Documents with QF-Test | GUI Test Tool for Java, Web and Windows
  • Demo - QF-Test Version 5.0 - Testing Windows applications
  • Demo - QF-Test Version 5.1 - embedded browsers

Webpack videos

Learn Webpack - Full Tutorial for Beginners

More videos:

  • Review - Core Concepts of Webpack
  • Review - Learn Webpack Pt. 6: Cache Busting and Plugins

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to QF-Test and Webpack)
Automated Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Web Application Bundler
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using QF-Test and Webpack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare QF-Test and Webpack

QF-Test Reviews

We have no reviews of QF-Test yet.
Be the first one to post

Webpack Reviews

Rollup v. Webpack v. Parcel
Tool Prod Build Time One Prod Build Time Two Prod Build Time Three Prod Build Time Avg Parcel 738.509 s 35.364 s 35.592 s 269.82 avg s Rollup 0.712 s 0.665 s 0.714 s 0.697 avg s Webpack 3.636 s 3.805 s 4.305 s 3.915 avg s
Source: x-team.com
If you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!
document.body.className = document.body.className.replace(/(^|\s)is-noJs(\s|$)/, "$1is-js$2")HomepageHomepageJavascriptBecome a memberSign inGet startedIf you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!And how to hit the ground running with Parcel.Ibrahim ButtBlockedUnblockFollowFollowingMar 16, 2018Click here to share this article on LinkedIn »Zero...
Source: medium.com
First impressions with Parcel JS
From first impressions and experience, my take currently would be as follows. Webpack is generally going to be more flexible. It also places a bit more power in the developers hands to make bundling happen exactly as desired. That isn’t to say you shouldn’t use Parcel though. Where Parcel excels is the fact you don’t configure it. You will still need to configure plugins for...
Source: codeburst.io
Parcel vs webpack - Jakob Lind
Webpack is the stable choice. You will not get fired for picking webpack. But you don’t get as much stuff for free such as optimized bundles, and code splitting.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webpack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 221 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

QF-Test mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of QF-Test yet. Tracking of QF-Test recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Webpack mentions (221)

  • Svelte Series-2: How to install Svelte
    If we don't want to use Vite or SvelteKit, or if we don't have the means to use them, then we need to integrate Svelte with our own environment. In our daily development, we usually use webpack or Rollup as our project's module management packaging tool. Therefore, I will introduce these two environments, how to build the Svelte environment. - Source: dev.to / 27 days ago
  • Practical and Beginner friendly guide for speeding up your web-apps
    There are various tools available that manage the size of bundled assets. We are going to use the example of a popular and widely used bundler named Webpack, and practically look at many of the optimization techniques it offers. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview
    In part 3 We jump into the world of bundlers, comparing webpack, esbuild, vite, and parcel 2. This section aims to guide developers through each bundler, focusing on their performance, compatibility, and ease of use. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Webpack: The Web Module Bundler
    Thats all about Webpack Basic, there are lots of feature of webpack, You can check here: https://webpack.js.org/. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • How to improve page load speed and response times: A comprehensive guide
    Many web pages use CSS and JavaScript files to handle various features and styles. Each file, however, requires a separate HTTP request, which can slow down page loading. Concatenation comes into play here. It involves combining multiple CSS or JavaScript files into a single file. As a result, pages load faster, reducing the time spent requesting individual files. Gulp, Grunt, and Webpack are some of the tools... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing QF-Test and Webpack, you can also consider the following products

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.

TestComplete - TestComplete Desktop, Web, and Mobile helps you create repeatable and accurate automated tests across multiple devices, platforms, and environments easily and quickly.

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.

Ranorex Studio - Accelerate testing with Ranorex Studio, the all-in-one tool for test automation. For desktop, web, or mobile app testing, with easy codeless automation tools, a full IDE, robust object recognition, flexible reporting and built-in Selenium WebDriver.

Parcel - Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler