Software Alternatives & Reviews

QF-Test VS Jasmine

Compare QF-Test VS Jasmine and see what are their differences

QF-Test logo QF-Test

The Tool for professional UI Test Automation - Automate your Web, Java, Windows and Android tests with QF-Test, the professional & reliable testing tool!

Jasmine logo Jasmine

Behavior-Driven JavaScript
  • QF-Test Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-17

QF-Test is the established tool for professional GUI test automation of desktop, web, mobile applications as well as PDF documents. On the market since 2001, the test tool is continuously being actively developed and is currently used by more than 1,500 companies across 60 countries.

QF-Test is a low-code GUI test tool that allows you to efficiently create test cases, e.g. using Capture/Replay, without any programming knowledge across platforms on Windows, Linux and macOS. For software developers, Jython, Groovy or JavaScript offer advanced scripting possibilities.

Tests can be run automatically via continuous integration tools such as Jenkins and generate detailed log files and XML or HTML reports.

Use QF-Test to create robust and stable regression tests for various GUI technologies.

QF-Test supports all types of Java GUIs, ranging from Swing (including ULC, JIDE components, CaptainCasa), its successor JavaFX, as well as the Standard Widget Toolkit (SWT) and Eclipse, including plugins and RCP applications.

You can also use QF-Test to test dynamic web applications based on Angular, React or Vue.js, for example, including Electron and hybrid applications using JxBrowser, JPro or WebSwing, for example.

Learn more at www.qfs.de. Contact us at service@qfs.de and we will help you find the right place for QF-Test in your organization!

  • Jasmine Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-17

QF-Test

Website
qfs.de
$ Details
paid Free Trial €2375.0 / One-off (One-time License purchase | Annual Maintenance + Support fee)
Platforms
Windows Linux Mac OSX Java Jython Groovy JavaScript Cross Platform Browser Google Chrome Safari Internet Explorer Firefox Edge Opera .Net C++ C
Release Date
2001 December

Jasmine

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

QF-Test features and specs

  • Continuous Integration: e.g. Jenkins, GitLab/CD, Bamboo, Travis CI, Circle CI, TeamCity, Ant, Maven, CruiseControl
  • Testing management: e.g. ALM/QualityCenter by MicroFocus/HP, TestBench by Imbus, QMetry, Klaros by Verit, TestLink, IBM Rational Quality Manager
  • Keyword driven Testing: Yes
  • Data driven Testing: e.g. with Excel, CSV and all kind of data bases
  • Error tracking: e.g. Jira, Mantis, Bugzilla
  • Scripting Language: Jython, Groovy, JavaScript
  • Browser: Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Safari, Microsoft Edge, Internet Explorer
  • Jira Integration: e.g. JIRA and JIRA PlugIns like TestRail, Zephyr, X-Ray, TM4J
  • Java in the browser: Webswing, JPro
  • Daemon mode: Yes
  • Object Recognition: Yes, stable and robust
  • Virtual Desktop Streaming: e.g. Citrix, VMware, VirtualBox
  • Docker: Yes
  • Version Control: e.g. Git, SVN/Subversion, CVS, Mercurial

Jasmine features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

QF-Test videos

Overview

More videos:

  • Demo - Quick Run-Through - Test Automation Features
  • Demo - Version 5.3 - CDP-Driver and New Icons
  • Demo - Technical insights
  • Review - Selenium vs. QF-Test | GUI Test Tool for Java, Web and Windows
  • Review - Testing PDF Documents with QF-Test | GUI Test Tool for Java, Web and Windows
  • Demo - QF-Test Version 5.0 - Testing Windows applications
  • Demo - QF-Test Version 5.1 - embedded browsers

Jasmine videos

Blue Jasmine - Movie Review by Chris Stuckmann

More videos:

  • Review - Blue Jasmine -- Movie Review
  • Review - Was Jasmine Ever Speechless? [Aladdin 2019 Review]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to QF-Test and Jasmine)
Automated Testing
26 26%
74% 74
Browser Testing
46 46%
54% 54
Testing
17 17%
83% 83
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using QF-Test and Jasmine. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare QF-Test and Jasmine

QF-Test Reviews

We have no reviews of QF-Test yet.
Be the first one to post

Jasmine Reviews

20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
In the State of JS ranking, Cypress has already surpassed some previously leading best testing frameworks, such as Jasmine, and is now ranked fourth for testing, with 35.8% of testers citing Cypress as their preferred testing framework, which is nearly identical to Mocha.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Jasmine seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 28 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

QF-Test mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of QF-Test yet. Tracking of QF-Test recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Jasmine mentions (28)

  • Migrating from Jest to Vitest for your React Application
    Vitest makes it effortless to migrate from Jest. It supports the same Jasmine like API. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Using Node.js for Automated Testing with Headless Browsers
    To execute your tests, you can create test scripts using popular testing frameworks like Mocha, Jasmine, or Jest. These frameworks provide a structured way to organize and run your tests, report results, and handle assertions. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Road Map To Become a Web Developer
    Testing frameworks like Jest, Mocha, and Jasmine are crucial for software development, ensuring code reliability and correctness. They offer features like test suites, test cases, assertions, and asynchronous testing support. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Naming Unit Tests Function
    The test framework used does matter for naming, because in some frameworks you'd use different naming conventions (i.e. The fluent naming used with https://jasmine.github.io/). Source: 11 months ago
  • Common Pitfalls in Angular Component Testing
    Learn more about Jasmine and Karma. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing QF-Test and Jasmine, you can also consider the following products

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Mocha - Sponsors. Use Mocha at Work? Ask your manager or marketing team if they'd help support our project. Your company's logo will also be displayed on npmjs. com and our GitHub repository.

TestComplete - TestComplete Desktop, Web, and Mobile helps you create repeatable and accurate automated tests across multiple devices, platforms, and environments easily and quickly.

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

Ranorex Studio - Accelerate testing with Ranorex Studio, the all-in-one tool for test automation. For desktop, web, or mobile app testing, with easy codeless automation tools, a full IDE, robust object recognition, flexible reporting and built-in Selenium WebDriver.

WebdriverIO - Webdriver module for Node.js. that makes it easier to write Selenium tests