Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Jasmine VS Mocha

Compare Jasmine VS Mocha and see what are their differences

Jasmine logo Jasmine

Behavior-Driven JavaScript

Mocha logo Mocha

Sponsors. Use Mocha at Work? Ask your manager or marketing team if they'd help support our project. Your company's logo will also be displayed on npmjs. com and our GitHub repository.
  • Jasmine Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-17
  • Mocha Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17

Jasmine features and specs

  • Behavior-Driven Development
    Jasmine is designed for BDD, which makes tests easier to understand and maintain, aligning well with modern development practices.
  • No Dependencies
    Jasmine does not require a DOM and has no dependencies, which simplifies initial setup and integration into various environments.
  • Comprehensive API
    Jasmine provides a rich set of matchers, spies, and utilities out of the box, making it easier to write complex tests.
  • Built-in Mocking
    Jasmine includes built-in features for spying and mocking functions, reducing the need for additional libraries.
  • Wide Adoption
    Jasmine is widely adopted in the industry, which means better community support, extensive documentation, and plentiful resources.
  • Framework Agnostic
    Jasmine can be used with any JavaScript framework or library, offering flexibility for different projects.

Possible disadvantages of Jasmine

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Users new to BDD or Jasmine might find its extensive API and different testing paradigms challenging to learn initially.
  • Async Testing Complexity
    Although Jasmine provides support for asynchronous tests, handling async code can still be complex and less intuitive compared to some other testing frameworks.
  • Verbose Syntax
    Writing tests in Jasmine can sometimes be more verbose compared to other testing libraries, potentially leading to longer, harder-to-read test files.
  • Limited Plugin Ecosystem
    Compared to some other testing frameworks like Jest, Jasmine has a more limited ecosystem of plugins and extensions.
  • Integration with ES Modules
    Jasmine's integration with modern JavaScript features like ES Modules can sometimes be less straightforward, requiring additional configuration or workarounds.

Mocha features and specs

  • Advanced Tracking Capabilities
    Mocha Pro offers planar tracking technology that handles complex shots with significant accuracy, ideal for professionals in film and video post-production.
  • Comprehensive Toolset
    Includes a wide array of tools such as masking, object removal, screen inserts, and stabilization, making it a versatile choice for various VFX tasks.
  • Cross-platform Compatibility
    Supports multiple host applications like Adobe After Effects, Avid Media Composer, and Nuke, providing flexibility for users across different software ecosystems.
  • Time-saving Automation
    Automated processes like object removal and masking save significant time compared to manual methods.
  • Extensive Learning Resources
    Offers comprehensive tutorials, webinars, and documentation to help users get up to speed quickly.
  • Industry-Standard
    Widely used in the industry, ensuring that skills learned in Mocha Pro are transferrable and valuable across many VFX jobs.

Possible disadvantages of Mocha

  • High Cost
    The software is relatively expensive, which may be prohibitive for hobbyists or small studios with limited budgets.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, the software can be complex to master, requiring significant time and effort to learn effectively.
  • Resource Intensive
    Requires a high-performance computer to run smoothly, which could be an additional expense if upgrades are necessary.
  • Standalone Learning Required
    Despite extensive resources, mastering Mocha Pro often requires time-consuming independent study outside of any existing production schedule.
  • Occasional Stability Issues
    Users have occasionally reported crashes or stability issues, which can disrupt workflows and cause frustration.
  • Subscription Model
    The subscription-based pricing model may not be ideal for all users, particularly those who might prefer a one-time purchase.

Analysis of Jasmine

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Jasmine is a good testing framework, particularly for those who want a straightforward, standalone solution for testing JavaScript. Its mature ecosystem and active community support make it a reliable choice.

Why this product is good

  • Jasmine is a popular behavior-driven development framework for testing JavaScript code. It is praised for being easy to set up and having no external dependencies, which makes it a great tool for testing purposes. Jasmine provides a clean syntax that makes tests readable and maintainable. It supports a variety of testing scenarios, including asynchronous testing and mock functionality, which are essential in modern web development.

Recommended for

  • JavaScript developers looking for a BDD framework.
  • Projects where ease of integration and minimal configuration are desired.
  • Development teams who prioritize readable and maintainable test code.
  • Those who need a robust solution for testing both synchronous and asynchronous code.

Analysis of Mocha

Overall verdict

  • Mocha by Boris FX is considered one of the best motion tracking and visual effects tools available in the industry. Its user-friendly interface, combined with powerful features, makes it an excellent choice for both beginners and seasoned professionals in the field.

Why this product is good

  • Mocha by Boris FX is widely regarded as a powerful and reliable motion tracking software. Its standout feature is the planar tracking system, which provides accurate and efficient tracking for complex scenes that are difficult to tackle with point trackers. The tool is also versatile, supporting a wide range of formats and is compatible with many industry-standard video editing and compositing applications. Mocha's advanced tools, like its roto-masking and stabilization capabilities, make it a favorite among visual effects artists and video editors.

Recommended for

    Mocha is highly recommended for video editors, visual effects artists, and post-production professionals who require precise motion tracking and rotoscoping capabilities. It is also well-suited for filmmakers and content creators who work on complex scenes requiring advanced tracking solutions.

Jasmine videos

Blue Jasmine - Movie Review by Chris Stuckmann

More videos:

  • Review - Blue Jasmine -- Movie Review
  • Review - Was Jasmine Ever Speechless? [Aladdin 2019 Review]

Mocha videos

2018 JORDAN 3 "MOCHA" REVIEW AND ON FEET !!!

More videos:

  • Review - DON'T BUY THE AIR JORDAN 3 MOCHA WITHOUT WATCHING THIS! (In Hand & On Feet Review)
  • Review - Air Jordan 3 'Mocha' 2018 Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Jasmine and Mocha)
Automated Testing
67 67%
33% 33
Developer Tools
67 67%
33% 33
Testing
64 64%
36% 36
Front End Package Manager

User comments

Share your experience with using Jasmine and Mocha. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Jasmine and Mocha

Jasmine Reviews

20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
In the State of JS ranking, Cypress has already surpassed some previously leading best testing frameworks, such as Jasmine, and is now ranked fourth for testing, with 35.8% of testers citing Cypress as their preferred testing framework, which is nearly identical to Mocha.

Mocha Reviews

20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Mocha is another leading JavaScript testing framework that runs on Node.js and is widely used for asynchronous testing. It is a feature-rich JavaScript framework, and tests in Mocha run sequentially, with accurate and flexible reports. For JavaScript automated testing, Mocha supports both BDD and TDD environments.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Jasmine seems to be a lot more popular than Mocha. While we know about 32 links to Jasmine, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Mocha. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Jasmine mentions (32)

  • Angular vs. React vs. Vue
    Apart from that, there is a lot of common ground regarding testing. All three contenders support the testing tools that many of you use and love, whether it is Jest, Jasmine, and Mocha for unit testing or Cypress, Playwright, and — of course — Selenium for end-to-end testing, among others. A shallow learning curve will be ahead if you want to use these testing tools. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Test Test Test
    Greetings, another week another lab this week covered the topic of automated testing. When selecting a test framework my first thought was to use Jasmine, which I had used previously, however it turns out that Jasmine does not have good support for ES modules. After doing a bit of research I opted to go with Vitest, since it was ES module compatible, and was inter-compatible with the very popular Vite tool chain. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Is the VCR plugged in? Common Sense Troubleshooting For Web Devs
    5. Automated Tests: Unit tests are automated tests that verify the behavior of a small unit of code in isolation. I like to write unit tests for every bug reported by a user. This way, I can reproduce the bug in a controlled environment and verify that the fix works as expected and that we wont see a regression. There are many different JavaScript test frameworks like Jest, cypress, mocha, and jasmine. We use... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • # 5 Testing Frameworks for JavaScript Developers
    Jasmine is renowned for its simplicity and is a popular choice for JavaScript testing. Here are its key features:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Migrating from Jest to Vitest for your React Application
    Vitest makes it effortless to migrate from Jest. It supports the same Jasmine like API. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

Mocha mentions (3)

  • What’s the most efficient way to get a 3D tracked camera into your Maya scene?
    You may wanna have a look at Mocha Pro or PFTrack, depending on your requirements and your budget. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Anyone know how to get the lock down plug in for free ?
    Don't pirate. If you need mesh tracking, I've had lots of success with Mocha Pro's PowerMesh. There's a free trial, and one month is only $37 USD. Source: over 3 years ago
  • First vfx video. Made my cousin spew laser from his eyes. I still have to learn mocha.
    Mocha is, at it's core, planar tracker, which means it tracks flat surfaces really well, but it's grown to become more of an "object tracker" that can track pretty much anything you want, the Pro version has a PowerMesh function similar to LockDown, powerful rotoscoping tools, and is generally considered to be incredibly useful in VFX. Here's the product page if you want to dive deeper. Pro is free for students... Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Jasmine and Mocha, you can also consider the following products

Mochajs - Mocha is a JavaScript test framework running on Node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple.

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

QUnit - What is QUnit? QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

JSHint - New JSHint website. Anton Kovalyov Oct 1st, 2013. For the last couple of weeks I've been working on a new homepage for JSHint and today I'm proud to announce the new jshint. com! JSHint Website.

Karma - Spectacular Test Runner for JavaScript

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.