Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Qase VS FitNesse

Compare Qase VS FitNesse and see what are their differences

Qase logo Qase

Test case management software for QA and development teams that helps you make your product better.

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.
  • Qase Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-05-16

Qase.io is a cloud test management application that helps your team to significantly boost testing productivity and organize your software testing efforts.

Test case management

Test suites can help you to organize all your test cases into logical groups. Comprehensive features of test cases allow you to define test case severity, priority; describe pre-conditions, post-conditions, and steps to reproduce test case.

Test plans and runs

You can compose test plans and then run tests. A smart wizard will guide you through the test plan and will help to check all cases at once. Time tracker will show detailed information about time spent for each case.

Team management

Invite your teammates to join and use all power of test case management tools together: run tests, write test documentation, compose test plans.

  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01

Qase

Website
qase.io
$ Details
freemium $24.0 / Monthly (per user)
Platforms
Browser
Release Date
2018 September

FitNesse

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Qase features and specs

  • Unlimited read-only users: Yes
  • Test case management: Yes
  • Test Plans: Yes
  • Requirements: Yes
  • Dashboards: Yes
  • Integrations: 30+
  • Automation support: Advanced
  • API: Yes
  • Test Review: Yes
  • Defect management: Yes
  • SSO: Yes

FitNesse features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Qase videos

Test Case Management - Qase intro

More videos:

  • Demo - Final Qase Demo Testing

FitNesse videos

No FitNesse videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Qase and FitNesse)
QA
94 94%
6% 6
Testing
83 83%
17% 17
Software Testing
93 93%
7% 7
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Qase and FitNesse. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FitNesse should be more popular than Qase. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Qase mentions (2)

  • How I build my Personal Expense Management App and what I learn from it
    Yep! And it's another huge thing for me. The way I started to test application now is by using Qase. This helps me to write manual test cases for my features and when I finish the work, I can run all test cases step by steps and check everything manually. It's nice to have things like this, because when you test something, you can forget small details about the requirements, but with this thing, it's like... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Qase.io - Test management system for Dev and QA teams. Manage test cases, compose test runs, perform test runs, track defects and measure impact. The free tier includes all core features, with 500Mb available for attachments and up to 3 users. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Qase and FitNesse, you can also consider the following products

TestRail - TestRail provides comprehensive test case management for software testing. Organize your testing, boost productivity, get real-time insights, and track progress toward milestones. Integrates with leading issue tracking and test automation tools.

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

TestLink - Test & requirements management

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

Kiwi TCMS - The leading open source test case management system, with a lot of great features, such as bug...

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.