Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

puppeteer VS Crusher.dev

Compare puppeteer VS Crusher.dev and see what are their differences

puppeteer logo puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium...

Crusher.dev logo Crusher.dev

Crusher | No-code e2e testing that allows you create and run test in <5 mins. Better alternative to selenium, cypress, browserstack, lambdatest, puepetter for testing.
  • puppeteer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02
Not present

Crusher is open-source no-code e2e web testing/monitoring. E2E testing is grueling and frustrating. We're reimagining the whole workflow to make it blazingly simple and fast.

We're no-code alternative to selenium, cypress, browserstack, lambdatest, puepetter for UI/User flow for cross browser testing .

🔮 Features

  • Create test without no code/low code.
  • Test UI and compare pixel perfect change with the last build.
  • Replay tests recording to debug faster.
  • Run test on chromium (Open source) and all browsers supported (EE).
  • Primitive user actions detection.
  • Production monitoring (EE feature)
  • Integrate with Github/Other services as Build check (EE feature)
  • Get alerts when build fails.
  • Report accessible by everyone in the team.

puppeteer

Website
github.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Crusher.dev

$ Details
freemium $50.0 / Monthly (5 testing hours)
Platforms
Web Browser Mac OSX Windows Linux
Release Date
2022 January

puppeteer features and specs

  • Headless Browsing
    Puppeteer allows headless browsing, which means you can automate and test web applications without opening a browser user interface, resulting in faster execution and lower resource usage.
  • Full Browser Control
    Enables full control over Chrome or Chromium browsers, allowing for comprehensive browser testing and automation, including taking screenshots, generating PDFs, and capturing web pages.
  • Rich API
    Offers a rich set of APIs that can control browsers, manage cookies, intercept network requests, and handle various browser events, making it versatile for different use cases.
  • Active Community
    Highly active open-source community with regular updates and a plethora of plugins and extensions, providing robust support and continuous improvements.
  • Compatibility
    Supports the latest JavaScript features and works seamlessly with popular libraries and frameworks, providing a modern development experience.

Possible disadvantages of puppeteer

  • Restricted to Chrome/Chromium
    Puppeteer is primarily designed to work with Chrome and Chromium browsers, limiting cross-browser testing capabilities compared to other tools that support multiple browsers.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running multiple instances of headless browsers can be resource-intensive in terms of CPU and memory usage, potentially affecting performance on limited hardware.
  • Learning Curve
    Requires some learning curve for developers unfamiliar with browser automation or the Puppeteer API, making initial setup and usage potentially time-consuming.
  • Lacks JavaScript Redaction
    Unlike some other tools, Puppeteer does not natively support JavaScript error redaction, which means developers must manage error handling and debugging themselves.
  • Not Ideal for GUI Tests
    Since Puppeteer is headless by default, it might not be ideal for GUI end-to-end tests that require visual validation, requiring additional tools or configurations to enable full browser displays.

Crusher.dev features and specs

  • Testing management
  • GitHub, Bitbucket and GitLab Integrations
  • Slack integration
  • No Coding Skills Required
  • API
  • Open-source

puppeteer videos

Puppeteer - Video Review

More videos:

  • Review - GameSpot Reviews - Puppeteer
  • Review - CGR Undertow - PUPPETEER review for PlayStation 3

Crusher.dev videos

Crusher- demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to puppeteer and Crusher.dev)
Automated Testing
94 94%
6% 6
Browser Testing
91 91%
9% 9
Browser Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using puppeteer and Crusher.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare puppeteer and Crusher.dev

puppeteer Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
Puppeteer offers more direct and tighter integration with Chrome or Chromium through the DevTools Protocol, unlike Selenium which abstracts the browser interaction through WebDriver, making it more versatile across different browsers but potentially less optimized for specific browser internals like those Puppeteer accesses in Chrome.
Source: bugbug.io
Best Data Scraping Tools
It is completely free. Puppeteer is well backed and supported by Google Chrome and hence replacing Selenium and PhantomJS. It automatically installs an efficient, compatible Chromium binary in its setup, therefore reducing the burden of keeping track on your browser.
Puppeteer vs Selenium
If you're looking for a better alternative, try Endtest. It has Puppeteer's speed, it supports Selenium's browsers AND it has all the features that they're missing.
Source: dev.to
Introduction to Headless Browser Testing
The Puppeteer API can be used to take screenshots, create PDFs, navigate pages, and fetch information from pages. We’ll write some example code to see Puppeteer in action.

Crusher.dev Reviews

We have no reviews of Crusher.dev yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, puppeteer seems to be a lot more popular than Crusher.dev. While we know about 106 links to puppeteer, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Crusher.dev. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

puppeteer mentions (106)

  • Top React Testing Libraries in 2025
    Puppeteer is a headless browser automation tool built on Chromium. It allows developers to simulate user interactions, capture screenshots, and perform UI tests with a high degree of accuracy. Puppeteer is particularly useful for testing cross-browser compatibility and visual elements in React applications. Its robust API enables precise control over browser actions, making it a valuable tool for UI testing and... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • End-to-End SEO Testing with Playwright and Lighthouse
    Vitest is a next-generation JavaScript testing framework powered by Vite. It’s an excellent alternative to Jest, offering native TypeScript support, a fast setup, and solid performance. However, while it has an experimental headless browser, it’s not ideal for advanced scenarios like running SEO audits in CI/CD pipelines. Instead, we can pair Vitest with Pupetter, a more mature tool for headless browser automation. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • The Puppeteer Language Experiment
    This project tests how the browser language can be changed with Puppeteer. It implements multiple options to set the language of Chrome and checks each option against BrowserLeaks to see how it affected the JavaScript proeprties and HTTP headers available by the browser. For more information, see my article The Puppeteer Language Experiment on DEV.to. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Scrapy Vs. Crawlee
    In Crawlee, you can scrape JavaScript rendered websites using the built-in headless Puppeteer and Playwright browsers. It is important to note that, by default, Crawlee scrapes in headless mode. If you don't want headless, then just set headless: false. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Sometimes things simply don't work
    I am not in any way associated with the developers at puppeteer, but if you are looking for a way to contribute, they are open source. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Crusher.dev mentions (2)

  • Crusher - All in on testing
    Install with just one command npx crusher.dev. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Do you have a dedicated QA team?
    Problem I faced in past with a dedicated QA team is, the development process is often faster than QA. Which puts QA in the backseat with each new release. Also, human coordination becomes a problem as there will be a small configuration of which QAs team might not be aware of e.g. A/B configurations, hotfixes, etc. On the other hand, with devs writing tests is there is learning curve and most devs have not written... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing puppeteer and Crusher.dev, you can also consider the following products

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Playwright - Playwright is automation software for Chromium, Firefox, Webkit using the Node.js library having a single API in place.

Apify - Apify is a web scraping and automation platform that can turn any website into an API.

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Herd Garden - Browser Superpowers for your AI Agents: Automate tasks, extract data, create AI web tools, and manage MCP servers in your browser or across millions of them. Secure, private, and scalable.