Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Pulse Secure VS Docker Registry 2.0

Compare Pulse Secure VS Docker Registry 2.0 and see what are their differences

Pulse Secure logo Pulse Secure

Pulse Secure provides a consolidated offering for access control, SSL VPN, and mobile device security. Contact Pulse Secure at 408-372-9600 to get a free demo.

Docker Registry 2.0 logo Docker Registry 2.0

Barebones but complete registry implementation for self-hosting.
  • Pulse Secure Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-16
  • Docker Registry 2.0 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-18

Pulse Secure videos

Pulse Secure VPN demo for Chrome

Docker Registry 2.0 videos

No Docker Registry 2.0 videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Pulse Secure and Docker Registry 2.0)
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0
Sysadmin
0 0%
100% 100
Security
100 100%
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Pulse Secure and Docker Registry 2.0. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Docker Registry 2.0 seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Pulse Secure mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Pulse Secure yet. Tracking of Pulse Secure recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Docker Registry 2.0 mentions (21)

  • regularly updating a docker image from source across several servers
    Run your own container registry, build and host everything yourself, dont rely on others. Docker for example has a option for that but imo its very basic and limited. Harbor is more advanced but still not overly complicated. You could add build workers to that and automate your entire pipeline, but maybe for a single image thats overkill. But good to have those options in the future. Things to look at for example:... Source: 11 months ago
  • regularly updating a docker image from source across several servers
    You can run your own docker registry if you want and push images to it: https://docs.docker.com/registry/. Source: 11 months ago
  • gitea for container image regsitry
    You can self-host your own. There is many alternatives but the official one you can find in these docs here Https://docs.docker.com/registry/. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Docker registry: Harbor or Nexus?
    Yes, this one https://docs.docker.com/registry/. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Authenticated Docker Hub image pulls in Kubernetes
    Operate a pull-through cache registry, like Artifactory or the open source reference Docker registry. This will allow you to pull images from Docker Hub less frequently, improving your chances of staying under the anonymous usage limit. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Pulse Secure and Docker Registry 2.0, you can also consider the following products

StackPath - Secure Content Delivery Network, DDoS, WAF Service

ProGet - ProGet is a repository manager that allows you to host your own personal or enterprise-wide package...

Flexera Software Vulnerability Manager - Flexera Software Vulnerability Manager provides solutions to continuously track, identify and remediate vulnerable applications.

Artifactory - The world’s most advanced repository manager.

Avast - Avast security software products are developed for Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X, Android and Linux users by AVAST Software.

Gitlab Container Registry - Built on open source software, GitLab Container Registry isn't just a standalone registry; it's completely integrated with GitLab.