Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

PullRequest.com VS Flow

Compare PullRequest.com VS Flow and see what are their differences

Flowlu
All-in-one work management platform for team collaboration. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

PullRequest.com logo PullRequest.com

Code review as a service

Flow logo Flow

Stop managing projects from your inbox.
  • PullRequest.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-06

PullRequest combines automation with a network of on-demand reviewers from companies like Google, Dropbox, and Amazon. With thousands of expert reviewers, we can review projects of any size or technical area. Integrated directly into GitHub, Bitbucket, and Gitlab.

  • Flow Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-12

PullRequest.com

Website
pullrequest.com
Pricing URL
Official PullRequest.com Pricing
$ Details
paid Free Trial $99.0 / Monthly (for individual developers)
Platforms
iOS Android C C++ .Net PHP Objective-C Magento Erlang Scala Elixir TypeScript Go Swift Groovy Ruby Perl JavaScript Java Python
Edit details

Flow

Website
getflow.com
Pricing URL
Official Flow Pricing
$ Details
Platforms
-
Edit details

PullRequest.com features and specs

  • Expert Code Reviewers
    PullRequest.com provides access to a network of experienced code reviewers with expertise in various programming languages and technologies, ensuring that your code is thoroughly and insightfully reviewed.
  • Improved Code Quality
    By leveraging professional code reviewers, the platform helps enhance code quality by identifying potential bugs, suggesting improvements, and ensuring adherence to coding standards.
  • Scalability
    The service can scale with your team's needs, whether you require sporadic code reviews for small projects or consistent evaluations for large development teams.
  • Time-Saving
    Outsourcing code reviews can save developers and teams significant time, allowing them to focus on other important tasks and speeding up the development process.
  • Objective Feedback
    External reviewers can provide unbiased, objective feedback without internal team dynamics influencing the review process, leading to more open and honest evaluations.

Possible disadvantages of PullRequest.com

  • Cost
    Using PullRequest.com may introduce additional expenses, which could be a concern for startups or companies with limited budgets compared to in-house reviews.
  • Security Concerns
    Sharing code externally may raise security concerns, especially for companies handling sensitive or proprietary information, despite security measures in place.
  • Integration Overhead
    Integrating an external review process into existing workflows may require adjustments, which could initially disrupt established development processes.
  • Variable Quality
    While many reviewers are highly skilled, the quality of reviews can vary depending on the reviewer assigned, potentially leading to inconsistent review quality.
  • Limited Context
    External reviewers may lack full context of the project details and organizational goals, which might impact the relevance of their suggestions compared to an in-house team.

Flow features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Flow offers a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to navigate through tasks, projects, and timelines. This reduces the learning curve and increases productivity.
  • Comprehensive Task Management
    The platform supports detailed task management features such as due dates, subtasks, and priorities, ensuring that users can stay on top of their responsibilities.
  • Team Collaboration
    Flow includes robust team collaboration tools like real-time updates, commenting, and file sharing, which facilitate effective communication and team workflow.
  • Customizable Workflows
    Users can customize their workflows to suit their project needs, which provides flexibility and adaptability for various types of projects.
  • Integrations
    Flow integrates with many other popular tools and services such as Slack, Google Drive, and Dropbox, allowing for seamless operations across different platforms.

Possible disadvantages of Flow

  • Cost
    Flow is a premium service with a subscription fee, which can be a drawback for small businesses or individuals looking for a free task management solution.
  • Limited Reporting
    The reporting and analytics features in Flow are not as advanced as some competitors’, which may be a downside for users looking for in-depth project insights.
  • Mobile App Limitations
    Some users have reported that the mobile app lacks certain features available on the web version, which can be inconvenient when on-the-go.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, some of the more advanced features can be complex and require time to master.
  • Dependence on Internet Connection
    As a cloud-based service, Flow requires an internet connection to access its features, which can be a limitation for users in areas with poor connectivity.

Analysis of Flow

Overall verdict

  • Flow is generally considered a good project management tool for teams looking for comprehensive task management and collaboration features. However, its suitability may vary based on specific team needs and preferences.

Why this product is good

  • Flow is often praised for its intuitive user interface and advanced task management features, including task assignments, deadlines, and seamless integration with other productivity tools. It is designed to improve team collaboration and enhance productivity by providing a centralized platform for project management.

Recommended for

    Flow is recommended for small to medium-sized teams seeking an easy-to-use project management tool with robust functionality. It's ideal for teams in creative, marketing, or development sectors that require task organization, project tracking, and team collaboration.

PullRequest.com videos

No PullRequest.com videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Flow videos

+ Add

flOw Review (PS4) - Learning To Love PlayStation

More videos:

  • Review - FLOW BY MIHALY CSIKSZENTMIHALYI | ANIMATED BOOK SUMMARY
  • Review - flOw review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PullRequest.com and Flow)

PullRequest.com

Flow

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
Project Management
100% 100
Code Coverage
100 100%
Code Coverage
0% 0
Productivity
4 4%
Productivity
96% 96

User comments

Share your experience with using PullRequest.com and Flow. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare PullRequest.com and Flow

PullRequest.com Reviews

We have no reviews of PullRequest.com yet.
Be the first one to post

Flow Reviews

The 10 Best Free Wrike Alternatives To Use in 2020 (Free & Trial)
The last spot in this roundup of free Wrike alternatives goes to Flow. Flow is a rather simplistic alternative solution to Wrike. If you feel Wrike’s features are overwhelming and too complicated for your team, Flow is the right tool to go for!
Source: www.ntaskmanager.com
The Top 9 Wrike Alternatives For Project Management in 2019 (Free & Paid!)
Flow advertises itself as simple task management, and it’s exactly that. Tasks are arranged in an easy-to-follow way, letting users quickly update where they are. Their reporting on task and project progress is also a plus. It lets you know how far along a task is until it’s completed, and how each team member is contributing to it.
Source: clickup.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PullRequest.com should be more popular than Flow. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PullRequest.com mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: Co-Founder? Seeking Co-Founder?
    I am a tech guy. Have 15+ years experience building backend systems. Now, I build user facing websites/services and release them. I have no knowledge of marketing/sales, so if you are a non tech guy who wants to do some fun projects, hit me up. Email in profile. Currently, I am working on a website where people can post their code and ask for feedback. (Something http://pullrequest.com/) Note that these are mostly... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Anyone has previously hired a programmer on Fiverr?
    Reviewing the code will be another hurdle for you. If you don't stay on top of this you will end up with an expensive POS. Maybe your friend can just do the code reviews for a cut? Otherwise, try something like pullrequest.com (code review as a service). Source: almost 4 years ago

Flow mentions (1)

  • What's your client management process?
    We use getflow.com for internal task management and email + meetings with clients. Tried tons of client facing tools and it never works. Source: over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PullRequest.com and Flow, you can also consider the following products

codebeat - Automated code review for Swift

Asana - Asana project management is an effort to re-imagine how we work together, through modern productivity software. Fast and versatile, Asana helps individuals and groups get more done.

Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review

Basecamp - A simple and elegant project management system.

Code Review by Codementor - Get an expert to review your code on-demand

Trello - Infinitely flexible. Incredibly easy to use. Great mobile apps. It's free. Trello keeps track of everything, from the big picture to the minute details.

Loading...