Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PullRequest.com VS Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner

Compare PullRequest.com VS Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

PullRequest.com logo PullRequest.com

Code review as a service

Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner logo Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner

Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner is a platform that offers a web vulnerability scanner and provides security testing to users for their web applications.
  • PullRequest.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-06

PullRequest combines automation with a network of on-demand reviewers from companies like Google, Dropbox, and Amazon. With thousands of expert reviewers, we can review projects of any size or technical area. Integrated directly into GitHub, Bitbucket, and Gitlab.

  • Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-27

PullRequest.com

$ Details
paid Free Trial $99.0 / Monthly (for individual developers)
Platforms
iOS Android C C++ .Net PHP Objective-C Magento Erlang Scala Elixir TypeScript Go Swift Groovy Ruby Perl JavaScript Java Python

PullRequest.com features and specs

  • Expert Code Reviewers
    PullRequest.com provides access to a network of experienced code reviewers with expertise in various programming languages and technologies, ensuring that your code is thoroughly and insightfully reviewed.
  • Improved Code Quality
    By leveraging professional code reviewers, the platform helps enhance code quality by identifying potential bugs, suggesting improvements, and ensuring adherence to coding standards.
  • Scalability
    The service can scale with your team's needs, whether you require sporadic code reviews for small projects or consistent evaluations for large development teams.
  • Time-Saving
    Outsourcing code reviews can save developers and teams significant time, allowing them to focus on other important tasks and speeding up the development process.
  • Objective Feedback
    External reviewers can provide unbiased, objective feedback without internal team dynamics influencing the review process, leading to more open and honest evaluations.

Possible disadvantages of PullRequest.com

  • Cost
    Using PullRequest.com may introduce additional expenses, which could be a concern for startups or companies with limited budgets compared to in-house reviews.
  • Security Concerns
    Sharing code externally may raise security concerns, especially for companies handling sensitive or proprietary information, despite security measures in place.
  • Integration Overhead
    Integrating an external review process into existing workflows may require adjustments, which could initially disrupt established development processes.
  • Variable Quality
    While many reviewers are highly skilled, the quality of reviews can vary depending on the reviewer assigned, potentially leading to inconsistent review quality.
  • Limited Context
    External reviewers may lack full context of the project details and organizational goals, which might impact the relevance of their suggestions compared to an in-house team.

Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner features and specs

  • Comprehensive Scanning
    Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner offers extensive scanning capabilities that cover a wide range of security vulnerabilities, including SQL Injection, XSS, and more. It provides in-depth assessment for web applications.
  • User-friendly Interface
    The platform has an intuitive and easy-to-navigate user interface that simplifies the scanning process, making it accessible even for users who might not have extensive security expertise.
  • High-accuracy
    Known for its high accuracy, Acunetix reduces the number of false positives, ensuring that users can trust the alerts and focus on actual vulnerabilities.
  • Continuous Monitoring
    The tool offers continuous scanning and monitoring, allowing organizations to identify vulnerabilities as soon as they appear, which enhances overall security posture.
  • Integration Capabilities
    It integrates easily with a variety of other tools and platforms, including CI/CD pipelines, issue trackers, and more, which streamlines security workflows and enhances collaboration.

Possible disadvantages of Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner

  • Cost
    Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner can be expensive, especially for smaller organizations or startups with limited budgets. The price might be a barrier to entry for some.
  • Resource Intensive
    The scanning process can be quite resource-intensive, which might slow down other operations running on the same servers or require dedicated resources.
  • Configuration Complexity
    While the user interface is intuitive, the initial setup and configuration for tailored scanning can be complex, potentially requiring expert knowledge for optimal utilization.
  • Limited Network Scanning
    Acunetix primarily focuses on web application vulnerabilities and might not be as comprehensive for traditional network vulnerability scanning compared to dedicated network security tools.
  • Update Frequency
    Although Acunetix is regularly updated, users have occasionally reported delays in the rollout of updates and new vulnerability definitions, which could leave some emerging threats undetected temporarily.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PullRequest.com and Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web Application Security
0 0%
100% 100
Code Coverage
100 100%
0% 0
Security
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using PullRequest.com and Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PullRequest.com seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PullRequest.com mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: Co-Founder? Seeking Co-Founder?
    I am a tech guy. Have 15+ years experience building backend systems. Now, I build user facing websites/services and release them. I have no knowledge of marketing/sales, so if you are a non tech guy who wants to do some fun projects, hit me up. Email in profile. Currently, I am working on a website where people can post their code and ask for feedback. (Something http://pullrequest.com/) Note that these are mostly... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Anyone has previously hired a programmer on Fiverr?
    Reviewing the code will be another hurdle for you. If you don't stay on top of this you will end up with an expensive POS. Maybe your friend can just do the code reviews for a cut? Otherwise, try something like pullrequest.com (code review as a service). Source: almost 4 years ago

Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner yet. Tracking of Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PullRequest.com and Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner, you can also consider the following products

codebeat - Automated code review for Swift

Netsparker - Netsparker is a tool for scanning web sites for security vulnerabilities.

Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review

Nessus - Nessus Professional is a security platform designed for businesses who want to protect the security of themselves, their clients, and their customers.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

Checkmarx - The industry’s most comprehensive AppSec platform, Checkmarx One is fast, accurate, and accelerates your business.