Software Alternatives & Reviews

Protecode Compact VS OWASP Dependency-Track

Compare Protecode Compact VS OWASP Dependency-Track and see what are their differences

Protecode Compact logo Protecode Compact

Protecode Compact is a full-featured software analysis and license management tool.

OWASP Dependency-Track logo OWASP Dependency-Track

OWASP Dependency-Track is an intelligent Software Composition Analysis (SCA) platform that allows...
  • Protecode Compact Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-25
  • OWASP Dependency-Track Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-03

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Protecode Compact and OWASP Dependency-Track)
Security
16 16%
84% 84
Web Application Security
33 33%
67% 67
Code Analysis
0 0%
100% 100
Open Source
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Protecode Compact and OWASP Dependency-Track. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OWASP Dependency-Track seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 19 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Protecode Compact mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Protecode Compact yet. Tracking of Protecode Compact recommendations started around Mar 2021.

OWASP Dependency-Track mentions (19)

  • Show HN: Pre-alpha tool for analyzing spdx SBOMs generated by GitHub
    I've become interested in SBOM recently, and found there were great tools like https://dependencytrack.org/ for CycloneDX SBOMs, but all I have is SPDX SBOMs generated by GitHub. I decided to have a go at writing my own dependency track esque tool aiming to integrate with the APIs GitHub provides. It's pretty limited in functionality so far, but can give a high level summary of the types of licenses your... - Source: Hacker News / 5 days ago
  • SQL Injection Isn't Dead Yet
    To detect these types of vulnerabilities, we should first and foremost know our dependencies and versions, and which of them have vulnerabilities. The OWASP Top 10 2021 identifies this need as A06:2021-Vulnerable and Outdated Components. OWASP has several tools for this, including Dependency Check and Dependency Track. These tools will warn about the use of components with vulnerabilities. - Source: dev.to / 15 days ago
  • Krita fund has 0 corporate support
    Https://dependencytrack.org/ You just need to use one of the various tools out there to scan. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Friends - needs help choosing solution for SBOM vulnerability
    OWASP Dependency Track - https://dependencytrack.org/. Source: 11 months ago
  • software inventory of my ECS tasks
    I actually want to build the same thing you are after, and I think I’ll go for the setup you describe in idea 2. The tool you can use for this is Trivy (https://trivy.dev), have it generate a SBOM and send it to Dependencytrack (https://dependencytrack.org). Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Protecode Compact and OWASP Dependency-Track, you can also consider the following products

ScanCode - ScanCode is a suite of utilities used to scan a codebase for license, copyright and other...

Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.

FOSSA - Open source license compliance and dependency analysis

Ninka - License identification tool for source code.

WhiteSource - Find & fix security and compliance issues in open source libraries in real-time.

Licensee - Detect what license a project is distributed under.