Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OWASP Dependency-Track VS Licensee

Compare OWASP Dependency-Track VS Licensee and see what are their differences

OWASP Dependency-Track logo OWASP Dependency-Track

OWASP Dependency-Track is an intelligent Software Composition Analysis (SCA) platform that allows...

Licensee logo Licensee

Detect what license a project is distributed under.
  • OWASP Dependency-Track Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-03
  • Licensee Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-14

OWASP Dependency-Track features and specs

  • Proactive Vulnerability Management
    Dependency-Track allows organizations to proactively identify and mitigate vulnerabilities in their software dependencies. By continuously monitoring and analyzing the components in use, it helps in preventing potential security breaches before they are exploited.
  • Comprehensive Reporting and Analytics
    The tool provides detailed reports and analytics on the security status of an organization's dependencies. This aids in tracking the risk profile over time, making informed decisions, and prioritizing remediation efforts effectively.
  • Integration with CI/CD Pipelines
    Dependency-Track can be seamlessly integrated into continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, ensuring that dependencies are automatically assessed for vulnerabilities as part of the software development lifecycle, enhancing security without disrupting development processes.
  • Support for Multiple Package Ecosystems
    Offering support for a wide range of package ecosystems, Dependency-Track can analyze components from various sources, making it versatile and applicable to a broad spectrum of technology stacks used by different organizations.
  • Open Source and Community-Driven
    Being an open-source project, Dependency-Track benefits from community contributions, which enhances its features, security, and reliability over time. It allows users to customize and adapt the tool according to their specific requirements.

Possible disadvantages of OWASP Dependency-Track

  • Complex Setup and Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration of Dependency-Track can be complex and time-consuming, especially for organizations that are new to vulnerability management tools. It may require a steep learning curve for effective use.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Dependency-Track, particularly in an enterprise environment with many projects and dependencies, can be resource-intensive, requiring significant computational power and storage, which may result in increased operational costs.
  • False Positives and Negatives
    Like many automated security tools, Dependency-Track may occasionally report false positives or fail to identify certain vulnerabilities (false negatives). This necessitates manual verification, which can be time-consuming and might require additional expertise.
  • Dependence on External Data Sources
    Dependency-Track relies on external vulnerability databases and data sources for its analyses (such as the National Vulnerability Database). Any inaccuracies or updates to these data sources can directly affect the accuracy of its vulnerability assessments.
  • Limited Offline Capabilities
    The tool's functionality is somewhat limited in offline environments because it needs access to external vulnerability databases for the most current information, which can restrict its usage in isolated networks or environments with strict internet usage policies.

Licensee features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

OWASP Dependency-Track videos

No OWASP Dependency-Track videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Licensee videos

Licensee Bob Wilke Reviews American Business Systems

More videos:

  • Review - Licensee Mike S. Reviews American Business Systems
  • Review - Licensee Beverly Reider Reviews American Business Systems

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OWASP Dependency-Track and Licensee)
Security
89 89%
11% 11
Open Source
80 80%
20% 20
Code Analysis
100 100%
0% 0
Web Application Security
76 76%
24% 24

User comments

Share your experience with using OWASP Dependency-Track and Licensee. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OWASP Dependency-Track seems to be a lot more popular than Licensee. While we know about 19 links to OWASP Dependency-Track, we've tracked only 1 mention of Licensee. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OWASP Dependency-Track mentions (19)

  • Show HN: Pre-alpha tool for analyzing spdx SBOMs generated by GitHub
    I've become interested in SBOM recently, and found there were great tools like https://dependencytrack.org/ for CycloneDX SBOMs, but all I have is SPDX SBOMs generated by GitHub. I decided to have a go at writing my own dependency track esque tool aiming to integrate with the APIs GitHub provides. It's pretty limited in functionality so far, but can give a high level summary of the types of licenses your... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • SQL Injection Isn't Dead Yet
    To detect these types of vulnerabilities, we should first and foremost know our dependencies and versions, and which of them have vulnerabilities. The OWASP Top 10 2021 identifies this need as A06:2021-Vulnerable and Outdated Components. OWASP has several tools for this, including Dependency Check and Dependency Track. These tools will warn about the use of components with vulnerabilities. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Krita fund has 0 corporate support
    Https://dependencytrack.org/ You just need to use one of the various tools out there to scan. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Friends - needs help choosing solution for SBOM vulnerability
    OWASP Dependency Track - https://dependencytrack.org/. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • software inventory of my ECS tasks
    I actually want to build the same thing you are after, and I think I’ll go for the setup you describe in idea 2. The tool you can use for this is Trivy (https://trivy.dev), have it generate a SBOM and send it to Dependencytrack (https://dependencytrack.org). Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Licensee mentions (1)

  • Github Workflow - How to account for false detection of License .meta files?
    I have a Github repo that hosts my custom package and I've been trying to follow the best Github project conventions possible for this code, including a Readme and so on to make as easy to use as possible. One of these "best practices" includes providing a LICENSE file for clarity and the Github site even uses the licensee package to automatically detect. Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OWASP Dependency-Track and Licensee, you can also consider the following products

Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.

ScanCode - ScanCode is a suite of utilities used to scan a codebase for license, copyright and other...

FOSSA - Open source license compliance and dependency analysis

WhiteSource - Find & fix security and compliance issues in open source libraries in real-time.

Ninka - License identification tool for source code.

Quick License Manager - Quick License Manager (QLM) is a license protection framework that creates professional and secure license keys to protect software against piracy.