Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Prosody VS Microsoft IIS

Compare Prosody VS Microsoft IIS and see what are their differences

VoIPstudio
VoIPstudio is an award-winning VoIP system that offers businesses of all sizes a scalable communication solution. It’s inexpensive, easy-to-use, offers a full suite of PBX features, and is fully integrated for CRM. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Prosody logo Prosody

Prosody is a modern flexible communications server for Jabber/XMPP written in Lua.

Microsoft IIS logo Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows
  • Prosody Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04
  • Microsoft IIS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-25

Prosody features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Prosody is designed to be lightweight and efficient, consuming minimal system resources compared to other XMPP servers, which makes it ideal for deployment on smaller servers or for situations requiring high performance.
  • Easy Configuration
    Prosody offers simple configuration files, allowing for easy setup and maintenance. This lowers the entry barrier for new users and administrators who may not be familiar with XMPP server configurations.
  • Flexible and Extensible
    With its modular architecture, Prosody supports plugins and modules, enabling users to extend and tailor the server to meet specific needs without modifying the core codebase.
  • Active Community
    Prosody has an active and supportive community which provides forums, tutorials, and ongoing development, ensuring that users have access to help and continual improvements.
  • Security Features
    Prosody supports state-of-the-art security features such as TLS encryption, ensuring that communications are secure and private by default.

Possible disadvantages of Prosody

  • Limited Built-in Features
    Compared to some other XMPP servers, Prosody may offer fewer features out-of-the-box, requiring users to rely heavily on modules for functionality.
  • Performance in Large Setups
    While Prosody is efficient, its performance might not scale as well in extremely large enterprise environments compared to some other dedicated enterprise XMPP solutions.
  • Less User-Friendly Advanced Configuration
    Advanced users looking to customize the server extensively may find the configuration and module system less intuitive or require additional learning compared to more GUI-based solutions.
  • Dependency on External Modules
    Since many features are implemented through third-party modules, reliability and stability can vary based on the module's maintainer and may introduce additional points of failure.

Microsoft IIS features and specs

  • Integration with Windows Server
    Since IIS is developed by Microsoft, it offers seamless integration with Windows Server, leveraging features like Active Directory, .NET Framework, and PowerShell for enhanced performance and manageability.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    IIS features a graphical user interface (GUI) that simplifies the server setup and management process, making it easier for administrators to configure and maintain web applications.
  • Extensive Documentation and Support
    Being a product from Microsoft, IIS offers comprehensive documentation, extensive online resources, and professional technical support, which can be highly beneficial for enterprise users.
  • Security Features
    IIS includes various built-in security features, such as dynamic IP restrictions, request filtering, application pooling, and integration with Windows authentication, making it a secure choice for hosting web applications.
  • Performance and Scalability
    IIS is optimized for performance and can effectively handle multiple requests and high-traffic websites. It also supports load balancing and server farms to enhance scalability.

Possible disadvantages of Microsoft IIS

  • Cost Considerations
    Unlike some other web servers that are open-source and free, IIS may incur licensing costs as it requires a Windows Server license, making it potentially expensive for small-scale deployments.
  • Platform Dependency
    IIS runs exclusively on the Windows platform, which can be a limitation for organizations that use a diverse set of operating systems or prefer open-source ecosystems like Linux.
  • Complex Configuration for Advanced Features
    While IIS offers a user-friendly interface for basic setups, configuring advanced features may require considerable expertise and can become complex, particularly for those unfamiliar with Microsoft's environment.
  • Performance Overheads
    IIS may introduce performance overhead due to the multiple layers of abstraction and integration with Windows features, which can affect performance in some high-demand scenarios compared to lightweight, minimalist web servers.
  • Lower Community Support
    Open-source web servers like Apache and Nginx have large, active communities that contribute to continuous improvement and troubleshooting. IIS, being a proprietary product, has a smaller community in comparison.

Analysis of Microsoft IIS

Overall verdict

  • Microsoft IIS is a good choice for businesses and developers who are already working within a Microsoft ecosystem or need close integration with Windows applications and services. It offers a solid balance of performance, security, and ease-of-management, making it a viable option for hosting a variety of web applications.

Why this product is good

  • Microsoft IIS (Internet Information Services) is a versatile and powerful web server that integrates seamlessly with Windows Server and other Microsoft technologies. It offers robust security features, efficient management tools, reliable performance, and strong support for .NET applications. IIS is known for its ease of use in Windows environments, offering a user-friendly graphical interface and a wide range of administrative tools, such as the IIS Manager. Additionally, it supports both static and dynamic content hosting and is capable of handling large volumes of traffic efficiently.

Recommended for

  • Organizations using Windows Server environments
  • .NET application developers
  • Businesses needing seamless integration with other Microsoft services
  • Companies looking for reliable security features
  • Web hosting providers serving enterprise-level clients

Prosody videos

+ Add

Pat Pattison - Introduction to Prosody in songwriting

More videos:

  • Review - Prosody and alliteration in musical compositions | Dr. B. Balasubramanyan | 29.12.2019

Microsoft IIS videos

+ Add

Analyzing Microsoft IIS Web Logs - Part 1

More videos:

  • Review - My SEO Video 2017 Microsoft IIS SEO Toolkit

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Prosody and Microsoft IIS)

Prosody

Microsoft IIS

Group Chat & Notifications
100 100%
Group Chat & Notifications
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
0 0%
Web And Application Servers
100% 100
Communication
100 100%
Communication
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
Web Servers
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Prosody and Microsoft IIS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Prosody and Microsoft IIS

Prosody Reviews

We have no reviews of Prosody yet.
Be the first one to post

Microsoft IIS Reviews

Apache, IIS, NGINX, GWS : What’s Your Choice?
Utilizing a specific type of virtual or physical server determines the type of web server software you use. If you prefer Microsoft, then you will prefer to use IIS (Internet Information Services / Server) by Microsoft as your primary web server application solution. If you use Linux distribution, you have other alternatives like Apache, NGINX and LiteSpeed.
Source: www.milesweb.in
What Is the Most Popular Web Server Application in 2021?
Despite being bundled with most modern Microsoft software, IIS loses out to Apache on its own devices. The main selling point here is performance. While IIS has kept up with Apache in recent times, Apache has historically been performing much better, which still gives it an edge over IIS.
Source: digitalintheround.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Prosody seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 15 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Prosody mentions (15)

  • Lua: The Little Language That Could
    There's also the http://prosody.im/ XMPP server that's written in Lua, and it's very successful there. The other major XMPP server implementation is in Erlang and they are equally praised, so that should tell something about Lua's versatility. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Lua: The Little Language That Could
    Lua on its own right can be fun too! If you are looking for a project to contribute to, there's for instance the Prosody XMPP server that's written in it, and contributes to the betterment of internet by promoting federated protocols. Source: about 2 years ago
  • A History of Lua
    You can write largish standalone application in Lua and it is not always a poor choice - Prosody [1] first comes to mind. But qualities which make it a good embedded language make it less _attractive_ for other uses. Lua has very simple syntax and small stdlib which allows its implementation to be very small - you can add Lua to your application and not increase its size significantly. But when the size is not a... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Chat app to allow messaging between my daughter and I?
    If you are really set on a LAN-only setup you could look at Prosody (combined with an Android app such as Conversations) which Snikket is based upon. It's not as "ready to go, out of the box" as Snikket and therefore requires a slightly higher skill level, but in exchange it is a lot more customizable and adaptable to different kinds of deployment scenarios. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Ask HN: What is your recommended stack for real time chat?
    My choice, because it's the stack I know very well, would be Prosody ( https://prosody.im/ - I'm one of the devs) and a web client such as Converse.js ( https://conversejs.org/ ). XMPP is highly extensible, Prosody is highly modular, which make them a good foundation for building on top of. That said, the right stack is generally the one that matches your requirements, and (if this isn't primarily a learning... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
View more

Microsoft IIS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Microsoft IIS yet. Tracking of Microsoft IIS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Prosody and Microsoft IIS, you can also consider the following products

Openfire - Openfire (formerly Wildfire) is a cross-platform instant messaging (IM) and groupchat server.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

Matrix.org - Matrix is an open standard for decentralized persistent communication over IP.

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Apache Vysper - Apache Vysper aims to be a modular, full featured XMPP (Jabber) server.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Loading...