Prosody Reviews

ASP.NET Core Reviews

Prosody mentions (15)

• Lua: The Little Language That Could

  There's also the http://prosody.im/ XMPP server that's written in Lua, and it's very successful there. The other major XMPP server implementation is in Erlang and they are equally praised, so that should tell something about Lua's versatility. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Lua: The Little Language That Could

  Lua on its own right can be fun too! If you are looking for a project to contribute to, there's for instance the Prosody XMPP server that's written in it, and contributes to the betterment of internet by promoting federated protocols. Source: about 1 year ago

• A History of Lua

  You can write largish standalone application in Lua and it is not always a poor choice - Prosody [1] first comes to mind. But qualities which make it a good embedded language make it less _attractive_ for other uses. Lua has very simple syntax and small stdlib which allows its implementation to be very small - you can add Lua to your application and not increase its size significantly. But when the size is not a... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• Chat app to allow messaging between my daughter and I?

  If you are really set on a LAN-only setup you could look at Prosody (combined with an Android app such as Conversations) which Snikket is based upon. It's not as "ready to go, out of the box" as Snikket and therefore requires a slightly higher skill level, but in exchange it is a lot more customizable and adaptable to different kinds of deployment scenarios. Source: almost 2 years ago

• Ask HN: What is your recommended stack for real time chat?

  My choice, because it's the stack I know very well, would be Prosody ( https://prosody.im/ - I'm one of the devs) and a web client such as Converse.js ( https://conversejs.org/ ). XMPP is highly extensible, Prosody is highly modular, which make them a good foundation for building on top of. That said, the right stack is generally the one that matches your requirements, and (if this isn't primarily a learning... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

ASP.NET Core mentions (5)

• The Case For Go Backends

  However, usage of a C# framework like ASP .NET Core or a Java framework like OfficeFloor are more than capable in the right hands. The key is to understand the tradeoffs of each language and framework, and to choose the right tool for the job. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Exploring Xperience By Kentico: Introductions

  The administration UI is now built on React and ASP.NET Core which means it's fast 🚀! - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• Trying to learn ASP.NET core, but confused by the documentation

  Per https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/learn/aspnet/what-is-aspnet-core, "ASP.NET Core is the open-source version of ASP.NET, that runs on macOS, Linux, and Windows. ASP.NET Core was first released in 2016 and is a re-design of earlier Windows-only versions of ASP.NET.". Source: almost 2 years ago

• How can I convince my boss not to use Windows Server?

  But how about you both get your wishes: ASP.NET Core? Use a Linux server - with which you are familiar with, to host the live/production version. And the web application itself can be locally developed and tested in ASP.NET on a Windows server, which is what your boss wants? Source: over 2 years ago

• 3 Different Hosting Models in Blazor

  Let’s remember that ASP.NET Core is cross-platform and can run practically anywhere. If you find yourself using C # for all your development, this is probably the best scenario for you to use anyway. With it, you can deploy your web application, which would also contain your Blazor Wasm assets in the same location. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago