Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Productivity Power Tools VS CMU Common Lisp

Compare Productivity Power Tools VS CMU Common Lisp and see what are their differences

Zoho CRM
Omnichannel CRM for Businesses of all sizes featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Productivity Power Tools logo Productivity Power Tools

Extension for Visual Studio - A set of extensions to Visual Studio 2012 Professional (and above) which improves developer productivity.

CMU Common Lisp logo CMU Common Lisp

CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.
  • Productivity Power Tools Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-20
  • CMU Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-15

Productivity Power Tools features and specs

  • Enhanced Features
    Productivity Power Tools provide numerous enhancements to the existing Visual Studio features, making navigation and coding more efficient.
  • Customization Options
    Users can customize the development environment to better suit their workflow, which can lead to increased productivity.
  • Improved Code Navigation
    The tools include enhanced navigation options, such as quick tabs and better search capabilities, allowing developers to find code faster.
  • Refactoring and Formatting
    The suite includes tools that assist with code refactoring and formatting, which can help maintain consistent code quality across projects.
  • Debugging Aids
    Debugging tools are improved, offering more intuitive ways to troubleshoot and resolve bugs in the code.

Possible disadvantages of Productivity Power Tools

  • Compatibility Issues
    Some users have reported compatibility issues with certain versions of Visual Studio or specific extensions.
  • Resource Intensive
    The additional features may consume extra system resources, potentially affecting the performance of the IDE on lower-end hardware.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    The variety of tools and options may overwhelm new users, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Potential for Dependency
    Reliance on these tools might limit a developer's ability to work efficiently in environments where they are not available.
  • Update and Maintenance
    Regular updates and maintenance are required to ensure compatibility with the latest versions of Visual Studio, which can be time-consuming.

CMU Common Lisp features and specs

  • High-Performance Compiler
    CMU Common Lisp features an efficient native code compiler that can produce highly optimized code for the supported platforms, enhancing performance for computationally-intensive applications.
  • Extensive Library Support
    Includes a wide variety of libraries, providing functionality ranging from numerical computing to system interfacing, which allows developers to implement diverse applications without relying heavily on external packages.
  • Strong Typing System
    CMUCL provides a strong type system with good error detection and optimization capabilities that can help catch errors at compile-time and improve runtime performance.
  • Garbage Collection
    It includes an efficient garbage collector that manages memory naturally, minimizing manual intervention and reducing memory leaks and fragmentation in applications.
  • Comprehensive Integrated Development Environment
    CMUCL comes with an integrated environment which includes a debugger, inspector, and an interface for efficient development and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of CMU Common Lisp

  • Limited Platform Support
    The number of platforms explicitly supported by CMUCL is limited, which can be a constraint for developers who need to work across multiple or newer systems.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Newcomers might find CMUCL challenging due to its complexity and the intricate features specific to Lisp, requiring a steep learning curve compared to more modern languages and environments.
  • Outdated Documentation
    Some users find the documentation to be outdated or not comprehensive enough, making it difficult to get started and fully leverage the system's capabilities.
  • Limited Community Support
    The user and contributor community for CMUCL is relatively small compared to other languages and projects, which may result in less frequent updates and fewer third-party resources.
  • Complex Setup Process
    Initial setup and configuration of CMUCL can be cumbersome, especially for users not familiar with Lisp environments or those who require specific custom configurations.

Analysis of Productivity Power Tools

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Productivity Power Tools is generally considered a good set of extensions for Visual Studio users. It enhances the development environment with features that many users find useful in improving their efficiency and productivity during coding sessions. The tools are well-integrated, easy to use, and regularly updated to stay compatible with newer versions of Visual Studio.

Why this product is good

  • Productivity Power Tools is a collection of extensions for Visual Studio that aims to improve and streamline the developer experience. It includes features such as enhanced code navigation, better tab management, and customizable editor enhancements. These tools are designed to make coding more efficient and reduce the cognitive load on developers by automating repetitive tasks and improving the overall workflow.

Recommended for

    Productivity Power Tools is recommended for software developers and engineers who use Visual Studio as their primary Integrated Development Environment (IDE). It is particularly beneficial for those looking to enhance their coding efficiency, improve navigation within the IDE, and customize their development environment to better suit their personal workflow preferences.

Productivity Power Tools videos

+ Add

Productivity Power Tools 2017

CMU Common Lisp videos

No CMU Common Lisp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Productivity Power Tools and CMU Common Lisp)

Productivity Power Tools

CMU Common Lisp

Regular Expressions
100 100%
Regular Expressions
0% 0
Programming Language
0 0%
Programming Language
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
IDE
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Productivity Power Tools and CMU Common Lisp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Productivity Power Tools seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 486 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Productivity Power Tools mentions (486)

  • Mistral Code
    > Mistral Code Enterprise is a fork of Continue. All due credit to the original creators of Continue. Source: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=mistralai.mistral-code Link destination: https://www.continue.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 days ago
  • Mistral Code
    The extension seems to be enterprise only. https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=mistralai.mistral-code. - Source: Hacker News / 3 days ago
  • Machine Code Isn't Scary
    IMO It depends a lot on the assembly flavour. The best ISA for learning is probably the Motorola 68000, followed by some 8-bit CPUs (6502, 6809, Z80), also probably ARM1, although I never had to deal with it. I always thought that x86 assembly is ugly (no matter if Intel or AT&T). > It quickly becomes tedious to do large programs IME with modern tooling, assembly coding can be surprisingly productive. For instance... - Source: Hacker News / 4 days ago
  • Copy Excel to Markdown Table (and vice versa)
    Https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=csholmq.excel-to-markdown-table And of course, markdowntools (multiple conversion tools):. - Source: Hacker News / 9 days ago
  • Edamagit: Magit for VSCode
    Gitless is this fork https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=maattdd.gitless it's not updated but still works well. - Source: Hacker News / 10 days ago
View more

CMU Common Lisp mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CMU Common Lisp yet. Tracking of CMU Common Lisp recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Productivity Power Tools and CMU Common Lisp, you can also consider the following products

rubular - A ruby based regular expression editor

CLISP - CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.

RegExr - RegExr.com is an online tool to learn, build, and test Regular Expressions.

Steel Bank Common Lisp - Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.

RegexPlanet Ruby - RegexPlanet offers a free-to-use Regular Expression Test Page to help you check RegEx in Ruby free-of-cost.

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

Loading...