Based on our record, Pro Git should be more popular than pre-commit by Yelp. It has been mentiond 280 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
# See https://pre-commit.com for more information # See https://pre-commit.com/hooks.html for more hooks Repos: - repo: https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks rev: v3.2.0 hooks: - id: trailing-whitespace - id: end-of-file-fixer - id: check-yaml - id: check-toml - id: check-added-large-files - repo: local hooks: - id: tox lint name: tox-validation ... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Pre-commit hooks act as the first line of defense in maintaining code quality, seamlessly integrating with linters and code formatters. They automatically execute these tools each time a developer tries to commit code to the repository, ensuring the code adheres to the project's standards. If the hooks detect issues, the commit is paused until the issues are resolved, guaranteeing that only code meeting quality... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Https://pre-commit.com/ can (and probably should) be used with any editor for such things. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Pre-commit Hooks: Pre-commit is a tool that can be set up to enforce coding rules and standards before you commit your changes to your code repository. This ensures that you can't even check in (commit) code that doesn't meet your standards. This allows a code reviewer to focus on the architecture of a change while not wasting time with trivial style nitpicks. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Ah, fair enough! On my team we use pre-commit[0] a lot. I guess I would define the history to be something like "has this commit ever been run through our pre-commit hooks?". If you rewrite history, you'll (usually) produce commits that have not been through pre-commit (and they've therefore dodged a lot of static checks that might catch code that wasn't working, at that point in time). That gives some manner of... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
The first couple of chapters of the "Git Book" should be a useful guide. Source: 5 months ago
Absolutely. Imo, the book on the official git website was the best resource that helped me understand and learn to use git. Source: 5 months ago
Including the git user manual [1] and the git book [2]? People tend to skip over those and go straight to the reference/manpages. 1. https://git-scm.com/docs/user-manual 2. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Stumbled upon the book pro-git and started reading it.It is a second edition from 2014. Source: 9 months ago
Are there any good training sessions on GIT (not GitHub) out there? All I can find is the Git Book, but it's frankly a fairly dry read and kinda a firehose of information to digest. Would love a O'Reilly book or something. Source: 10 months ago
pre-commit - A slightly improved pre-commit hook for git
Learn Git Branching - "Learn Git Branching" is the most visual and interactive way to learn Git on the web; you'll be challenged with exciting levels, given step-by-step demonstrations of powerful features, and maybe even have a bit of fun along the way.
Python Poetry - Python packaging and dependency manager.
GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.
EditorConfig - EditorConfig is a file format and collection of text editor plugins for maintaining consistent coding styles between different editors and IDEs.
GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.