pre-commit by Yelp VS Gitea

pre-commit by Yelp Reviews

Gitea Reviews

pre-commit by Yelp mentions (142)

• Implementing Quality Checks In Your Git Workflow With Hooks and pre-commit

  # See https://pre-commit.com for more information # See https://pre-commit.com/hooks.html for more hooks Repos: - repo: https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks rev: v3.2.0 hooks: - id: trailing-whitespace - id: end-of-file-fixer - id: check-yaml - id: check-toml - id: check-added-large-files - repo: local hooks: - id: tox lint name: tox-validation ... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• Embracing Modern Python for Web Development

  Pre-commit hooks act as the first line of defense in maintaining code quality, seamlessly integrating with linters and code formatters. They automatically execute these tools each time a developer tries to commit code to the repository, ensuring the code adheres to the project's standards. If the hooks detect issues, the commit is paused until the issues are resolved, guaranteeing that only code meeting quality... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• EmacsConf Live Now

  Https://pre-commit.com/ can (and probably should) be used with any editor for such things. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• A Tale of Two Kitchens - Hypermodernizing Your Python Code Base

  Pre-commit Hooks: Pre-commit is a tool that can be set up to enforce coding rules and standards before you commit your changes to your code repository. This ensures that you can't even check in (commit) code that doesn't meet your standards. This allows a code reviewer to focus on the architecture of a change while not wasting time with trivial style nitpicks. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

• Things I just don't like about Git

  Ah, fair enough! On my team we use pre-commit[0] a lot. I guess I would define the history to be something like "has this commit ever been run through our pre-commit hooks?". If you rewrite history, you'll (usually) produce commits that have not been through pre-commit (and they've therefore dodged a lot of static checks that might catch code that wasn't working, at that point in time). That gives some manner of... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Gitea mentions (60)

• Beware Offers of “Help” with Your Projects

  This reminds me of Gogs [0], where the original author refused a lot of good ideas and improvements, eventually leading to a fork [1] that's now a lot more popular and active than the original. [0] https://gogs.io/ [1] https://gitea.io/en-us/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

• Incident with Issues and Pull Requests

  Yes, we do this using https://gitea.io/en-us/ on a private server. Firewall, backups and a replica running for most projects. Github is only used when it's required by a stakeholder. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

• Let's Make Sure GitHub Doesn't Become the Only Option

  There's a number of places out there, some of which also support alternatives to Git itself. By no means a complete list and in no particular order: GitLab - https://about.gitlab.com/ Sourcehut - https://sourcehut.org/ Codeberg - https://codeberg.org/ Launchpad - https://launchpad.net/ Debian Salsa - https://salsa.debian.org/public Pagure - https://pagure.io/pagure For self hsoted options, there's these below... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

• If you're on DSM 6 and still waiting for an update on the GitLab package, don't bother

  And if you need GitLab (for runner, etc...) then it's not too bad to run in Docker. But if anyone is looking for a somewhat simpler git solution, gitea is pretty great. Source: about 1 year ago

• OpenBSD Upgrade 7.2 to 7.3

  Check: Configuration and syntax changes and Special packages. The latter includes changes on PostgreSQL, Python and Gitea. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago